Mass shooting at New Zealand mosque

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How do you square a "white supremacist" terrorist from New Zealand liking a black right leaning American? Clearly the man is deranged.

And how does one equate conservatism with the view that people cause climate change?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AUSSIE GUNMAN’S MANIFESTO EMERGES
The manifesto contains “white supremacist” propaganda. Mr Buchanan said told 1NEWSNZ he had seen the manifesto, and the shooting is “clearly the case of a white supremacist.”

In the 37-page document, he said he had planned the attack for two years and had a location lined up three months before the attack today.

He goes on to describe himself as an “eco-fascist”.

“I was a communist, then an anarchist and finally a libertarian before becoming an eco-fascist,” he wrote.

He also made a bizarre reference to Spyro the Dragon, a PlayStation game, saying it “taught me ethno-nationalism”.

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/world/gunman-opens-fire-in-christchurch-mosque/news-story/6f6ce5dc9db6cde5edf5ae778b6da368

Don’t forget TRUMP-supporting white supremacist as per Daily Mail headline. Sickos. Evil!

He said he did notsupport Trump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How do you square a "white supremacist" terrorist from New Zealand liking a black right leaning American? Clearly the man is deranged.

This makes no sense. Of course, people - both crazy and sane - can be opportunists.

But I agree - deranged. I don't care if he's a white male; he's crazy.

No one who's sane has that much hatred.

Humans have been hating and killing other humans since the beginning of time. What always bothers me is when race is used on this board to promote an agenda when something terrible like this happens. The man is deranged and so were many of the others who perpetrated this mass killing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I stopped reading at "manifesto."

Dude has serious mental issues.

+1.

Don't give the terrorist the pleasure of reading whatever he wrote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This guy is goading left-wing governments and tech companies into censoring anyone right of center in order to genuinely radicalise them.

I hope that doesn't happen.

Which tells you who he actually is

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How do you square a "white supremacist" terrorist from New Zealand liking a black right leaning American? Clearly the man is deranged.

And how does one equate conservatism with the view that people cause climate change?

Non sequitur

[Anonymous]

He did it for the US and admits that he's a terrorist:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8642007/new-zealand-mosque-shooting-manifesto-anders-breivik/

"By the definition, then yes. It is a terrorist attack. But I believe it is a partisan action against an occupying force."

He boasted that he chose to use firearms so he could influence politics in the US.

He wrote that he wanted to "create conflict between the two ideologies within the United States on the ownership of firearms in order to further the social, cultural, political and racial divide".

And he ranted about his hopes that “this conflict over the 2nd amendment and the attempted removal of firearms rights will ultimately result in a civil war that will eventually balkanize the US along political, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines.”

Congratulations to the gun nutters here. You have a brother in arms across the world.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How do you square a "white supremacist" terrorist from New Zealand liking a black right leaning American? Clearly the man is deranged.

And how does one equate conservatism with the view that people cause climate change?

Non sequitur

Can you answer the question?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He did it for the US and admits that he's a terrorist:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8642007/new-zealand-mosque-shooting-manifesto-anders-breivik/

"By the definition, then yes. It is a terrorist attack. But I believe it is a partisan action against an occupying force."

He boasted that he chose to use firearms so he could influence politics in the US.

He wrote that he wanted to "create conflict between the two ideologies within the United States on the ownership of firearms in order to further the social, cultural, political and racial divide".

And he ranted about his hopes that “this conflict over the 2nd amendment and the attempted removal of firearms rights will ultimately result in a civil war that will eventually balkanize the US along political, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines.”

Congratulations to the gun nutters here. You have a brother in arms across the world.

Sounds like Antifa

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AUSSIE GUNMAN’S MANIFESTO EMERGES
The manifesto contains “white supremacist” propaganda. Mr Buchanan said told 1NEWSNZ he had seen the manifesto, and the shooting is “clearly the case of a white supremacist.”

In the 37-page document, he said he had planned the attack for two years and had a location lined up three months before the attack today.

He goes on to describe himself as an “eco-fascist”.

“I was a communist, then an anarchist and finally a libertarian before becoming an eco-fascist,” he wrote.

He also made a bizarre reference to Spyro the Dragon, a PlayStation game, saying it “taught me ethno-nationalism”.

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/world/gunman-opens-fire-in-christchurch-mosque/news-story/6f6ce5dc9db6cde5edf5ae778b6da368

Don’t forget TRUMP-supporting white supremacist as per Daily Mail headline. Sickos. Evil!

He said he did notsupport Trump

Where did he state this? So many articles, not sure which one to read.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He did it for the US and admits that he's a terrorist:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8642007/new-zealand-mosque-shooting-manifesto-anders-breivik/

"By the definition, then yes. It is a terrorist attack. But I believe it is a partisan action against an occupying force."

He boasted that he chose to use firearms so he could influence politics in the US.

He wrote that he wanted to "create conflict between the two ideologies within the United States on the ownership of firearms in order to further the social, cultural, political and racial divide".

And he ranted about his hopes that “this conflict over the 2nd amendment and the attempted removal of firearms rights will ultimately result in a civil war that will eventually balkanize the US along political, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines.”

Congratulations to the gun nutters here. You have a brother in arms across the world.

Well he was 100% right about you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He did it for the US and admits that he's a terrorist:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8642007/new-zealand-mosque-shooting-manifesto-anders-breivik/

"By the definition, then yes. It is a terrorist attack. But I believe it is a partisan action against an occupying force."

He boasted that he chose to use firearms so he could influence politics in the US.

He wrote that he wanted to "create conflict between the two ideologies within the United States on the ownership of firearms in order to further the social, cultural, political and racial divide".

And he ranted about his hopes that “this conflict over the 2nd amendment and the attempted removal of firearms rights will ultimately result in a civil war that will eventually balkanize the US along political, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines.”

Congratulations to the gun nutters here. You have a brother in arms across the world.

Sounds like Antifa

? Which antifa member shot up a bunch of people in the name of the 2a.?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How do you square a "white supremacist" terrorist from New Zealand liking a black right leaning American? Clearly the man is deranged.

And how does one equate conservatism with the view that people cause climate change?

Non sequitur

Can you answer the question?

Sure, lots of people are influenced by their background. The reality is always something in the middle.

Can you answer my question or will you do what everyone else on this board does - ask another question to push a narrarive?

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How do you square a "white supremacist" terrorist from New Zealand liking a black right leaning American? Clearly the man is deranged.

And how does one equate conservatism with the view that people cause climate change?

Non sequitur

Can you answer the question?

Let the killer answer it for you. From his manifest:

Why focus on immigration and birth rates when climate change is such a huge issue?
Because they are the same issue, the environment is being destroyed by over population, we Europeans are one of the groups that are not over populating the world. The invaders are the ones over populating the world. Kill the invaders, kill the overpopulation and by doing so save the environment.

[Anonymous]

Which is worse - another senseless tragedy or another let's blame this on the right in the us?