So who truly believes...

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:That trump is an innocent victim in all of this and everyone is lying? Everyone but him! He’s clean as a whistle, and everyone is out to get him for no reason. Never conspired, never laundered money...


I'll believe Trump is guilty when there is evidence that he is guilty. The other people are not so much as lying as proclaiming a conclusion without sufficient evidence.

We are a society of laws. We don't mark someone as guilty just because people think he is, we demand evidence.


Like Trump and his cultists demanded (and still do) before chanting "lock her up"?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:That trump is an innocent victim in all of this and everyone is lying? Everyone but him! He’s clean as a whistle, and everyone is out to get him for no reason. Never conspired, never laundered money...


I could believe that he has such severe dementia that he's getting close to the point at which it would be hard to take regular legal action against him.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No one believes trump at this point. His supporters just don't want to admit they made a mistake. Most liberals and a fair amount of conservatives told us this was a disaster in the making in early 2016. For a trump "supporter" that means the GD Libtards were right all along. Not gonna happen. Sorry if I sound arrogant and elitist but shit , it's the truth.


You are not only arrogant, you are wrong.

Granted, Trump is obnoxious and childish, but his policies are working and he is accomplishing things.


+1
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No one believes trump at this point. His supporters just don't want to admit they made a mistake. Most liberals and a fair amount of conservatives told us this was a disaster in the making in early 2016. For a trump "supporter" that means the GD Libtards were right all along. Not gonna happen. Sorry if I sound arrogant and elitist but shit , it's the truth.


You are not only arrogant, you are wrong.

Granted, Trump is obnoxious and childish, but his policies are working and he is accomplishing things.

I agree. The problem is some people can't get past his horrible personality. His policies are much better for this country than failed liberal policies.


How? Farmers are struggling. Civil Rights being dismantled. Our air and water quality are going to shit. He's putting our lives in the hands of corporations (bad for everyone!) I don't care about the tariffs. I make enough money that it will literally have no impact on me. Not everyone can say that.


PP here - oh yes, he was supposed to make us stronger internationally. Instead, we are the laughing stock of the world.

Nobody took Obama and his lines in the sand seriously.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:That trump is an innocent victim in all of this and everyone is lying? Everyone but him! He’s clean as a whistle, and everyone is out to get him for no reason. Never conspired, never laundered money...


I'll believe Trump is guilty when there is evidence that he is guilty. The other people are not so much as lying as proclaiming a conclusion without sufficient evidence.

We are a society of laws. We don't mark someone as guilty just because people think he is, we demand evidence.


Yet you have no problem believing the secret society is meeting in the basememt of Comet Ping Pong to discuss the insurance plan, THE INSURANCE PLAN, to protect the child sex slave colony on Mars.


Not the PP, but you do realize you're talking about a tiny group of nutters, right? Should we paint all Democrats with the same brush we use to paint crazy left-wingers with? Because I assure you - we could certainly do the same.

Quit your hysterics and try to grasp something important. There are many independent, undecided voters out there. That they don't mindlessly follow your marching orders is a credit to their critical thinking ability. I hope those are the people who decide the next election.


A tiny group of nutters? Nice try. Those were all theories floated by republicans in congress or Trump himself. If the independent voters aren't repulsed after witnessing all the GOP theatrics and scandals, then they aren't really independent after all.


Sources? The only people floating those "theories" and actually believing them were - again - a tiny group of nutters. If you don't provide some reputable sources for your claims, I'll report you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:That trump is an innocent victim in all of this and everyone is lying? Everyone but him! He’s clean as a whistle, and everyone is out to get him for no reason. Never conspired, never laundered money...


I'll believe Trump is guilty when there is evidence that he is guilty. The other people are not so much as lying as proclaiming a conclusion without sufficient evidence.

We are a society of laws. We don't mark someone as guilty just because people think he is, we demand evidence.


Yet you have no problem believing the secret society is meeting in the basememt of Comet Ping Pong to discuss the insurance plan, THE INSURANCE PLAN, to protect the child sex slave colony on Mars.


Not the PP, but you do realize you're talking about a tiny group of nutters, right? Should we paint all Democrats with the same brush we use to paint crazy left-wingers with? Because I assure you - we could certainly do the same.

Quit your hysterics and try to grasp something important. There are many independent, undecided voters out there. That they don't mindlessly follow your marching orders is a credit to their critical thinking ability. I hope those are the people who decide the next election.


A tiny group of nutters? Nice try. Those were all theories floated by republicans in congress or Trump himself. If the independent voters aren't repulsed after witnessing all the GOP theatrics and scandals, then they aren't really independent after all.


Sources? The only people floating those "theories" and actually believing them were - again - a tiny group of nutters. If you don't provide some reputable sources for your claims, I'll report you.


A tiny group of nutters including the National Security Advisor-to-be. Not just his son, him.

Anonymous
Wait, what happened to those "Republicans in Congress"??
Anonymous
The Russian mess occurred while Obama was president.Period.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The Russian mess occurred while Obama was president.Period.


And Obama brought it to the joint comm on intel, and the leadership of both houses. McConnell killed any action, and threatened to convene a closed continuing hearing to prevent any release. Period.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The Russian mess occurred while Obama was president.Period.


So you truly believe Trump’s crimes are Obama’s fault?
Anonymous
So Trump shifts 25% percent of his campaign media buys in the final weeks and claims it was “data driven” and, just by coincidence, at the same the GRU was inside the DNC network in real time, busy hacking the DNC analytics and communicating with Roger Stone? If there was a conspiracy and overt collusion, Mudller has them dead to rights because, as we now know, the IC has his team working inside the GRU operation, tracking them keystroke by keystroke.


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Wait, what happened to those "Republicans in Congress"??


The Republicans in congress spread around the secret society and insurance policy hysteria.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:So Trump shifts 25% percent of his campaign media buys in the final weeks and claims it was “data driven” and, just by coincidence, at the same the GRU was inside the DNC network in real time, busy hacking the DNC analytics and communicating with Roger Stone? If there was a conspiracy and overt collusion, Mudller has them dead to rights because, as we now know, the IC has his team working inside the GRU operation, tracking them keystroke by keystroke.




Nate Silver isn’t buying it...........

@NateSilver538
Follow Follow @NateSilver538
More
Nate Silver Retweeted ?????
Not sure I buy this. Trump's Electoral College strategy, including putting a lot of emphasis on the Midwest, was pretty much what the 538 model would have recommended, which was based entirely on publicly-available data.

https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1018292530692190208
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:That trump is an innocent victim in all of this and everyone is lying? Everyone but him! He’s clean as a whistle, and everyone is out to get him for no reason. Never conspired, never laundered money...


Been this long and no charges? Why?


It's been less than a year. Benghazi took a lot longer and you guys seemed to have all the patience in the world. What's the rush?


Okay, so it's natural in the meantime while investigation is going on to withhold judgement until there is actual evidence of guilt. Why the left and mass media (but I repeat myself) just assumes that Trump is guilty is beyond me. I mean look at the OP, who is positively distraught that there are people who is still undecided.


+1,000,000
This whole determination that someone is guilty before they've actually been charged with anything is symptomatic of so much that is wrong with the Democratic party. Last I checked, we are all innocent until proven guilty. I'll withhold my judgment until (and if) there are any actual charges against Trump.


This is honestly comical considering the right’s hysteria about Hillary for years.
Anonymous
And bill’s impeachment ^^^
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: