David foster going for number 5. Catherine Mcphee

[Anonymous]

Eww....
And even weirder is that his 35 yr. old daughter calls the 34 yr. old Katherine “Mom.”

He will never get better than Yolanda Hadid.
Plus he looks like he is hanging out with his youngest daughter in that photo.

Just eww.

[Anonymous]

Wasn’t David Foster recently dating the beautiful, ageless Christie Brinkley last year or so....??!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Eww....
And even weirder is that his 35 yr. old daughter calls the 34 yr. old Katherine “Mom.”

He will never get better than Yolanda Hadid.
Plus he looks like he is hanging out with his youngest daughter in that photo.

Just eww.

Yolanda, really? Her health declined right after they got married (and miraculously improved after getting her leaky silicone implants out). I think his best marriage was to Linda. She is/was gorgeous and was age appropriate for him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wasn’t David Foster recently dating the beautiful, ageless Christie Brinkley last year or so....??!

They dated spring 2017, so not that long ago. She is beautiful and ageless but she has to be a mess, although she also has been married four times so maybe it would have been a perfect match.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do guys like these actually take the vow of marriage. They should just live together until that no longer works. Seems insane to get a marriage certificate.

+1 but maybe he’s aiming to surpass Liz Taylor’s record?

+2. Why get married?

I suspect its her request not his. And if he wants that booty, she gets the ring. Same reason most people get married.

And there are a bunch of gossip articles saying she wants to have a baby. DCUM will lose its collective mind if David Foster and Katherine McPhee have a baby together.

Also, I’m pretty sure his daughter Erin was being ironic or sarcastic or something in her Instagram calling Kat “Mommyyy”

[Anonymous]

Of course a younger woman would want to have a baby. Foster is not known for lengthy marriages and this would guarantee the cash.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Of course a younger woman would want to have a baby. Foster is not known for lengthy marriages and this would guarantee the cash.

She's 34 and was married for 8 years. Why wouldn't she have had a baby already?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Am I supposed to know who that is?



And what does a 34 year old see in a man that is 34 years older than her? Hell, his daughter a year older than his fiancee!

$

[Anonymous]

They have something in common. They both have to pay a lot to get out of their respective marriages.

Katharine McPhee may be "over it" — but her ill-fated romance is going to leave a dent in her wallet. The "American Idol" alum finalized her divorce from her manager Nicholas Costas on Wednesday and her former beau is walking away single and richer, according to court documents. The 31-year-old actress and singer will have to pay up to $400,000 a year in spousal support dependent on her income, records obtained by People magazine said. In the next few days, McPhee must also fork over $102,616 to Costas. The dues come from the couple splitting the rights to songs McPhee recorded while together — which includes tracks that have yet to be released. Costas will also receive half of the income from her acting work in the show "Smash."

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/katharine-mcphee-finalizes-divorce-nick-costas-article-1.2527700

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They have something in common. They both have to pay a lot to get out of their respective marriages.

Katharine McPhee may be "over it" — but her ill-fated romance is going to leave a dent in her wallet. The "American Idol" alum finalized her divorce from her manager Nicholas Costas on Wednesday and her former beau is walking away single and richer, according to court documents. The 31-year-old actress and singer will have to pay up to $400,000 a year in spousal support dependent on her income, records obtained by People magazine said. In the next few days, McPhee must also fork over $102,616 to Costas. The dues come from the couple splitting the rights to songs McPhee recorded while together — which includes tracks that have yet to be released. Costas will also receive half of the income from her acting work in the show "Smash."

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/katharine-mcphee-finalizes-divorce-nick-costas-article-1.2527700

I’m surprised he had to pay very much. You’d think he would have had a prenup.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They have something in common. They both have to pay a lot to get out of their respective marriages.

Katharine McPhee may be "over it" — but her ill-fated romance is going to leave a dent in her wallet. The "American Idol" alum finalized her divorce from her manager Nicholas Costas on Wednesday and her former beau is walking away single and richer, according to court documents. The 31-year-old actress and singer will have to pay up to $400,000 a year in spousal support dependent on her income, records obtained by People magazine said. In the next few days, McPhee must also fork over $102,616 to Costas. The dues come from the couple splitting the rights to songs McPhee recorded while together — which includes tracks that have yet to be released. Costas will also receive half of the income from her acting work in the show "Smash."

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/katharine-mcphee-finalizes-divorce-nick-costas-article-1.2527700

Yea well cheating on your husband very publicly with your (also married) director isn't a great way to end a marriage on good terms.

Also, she publicly stated she has "no regrets" about the affair so she's trash. I hope they give each other all the STDs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course a younger woman would want to have a baby. Foster is not known for lengthy marriages and this would guarantee the cash.

She's 34 and was married for 8 years. Why wouldn't she have had a baby already?

This one's the big leagues. There'll be a baby announcement by the end of the year.

[Anonymous]

I don't have much to add here, but Katherine McPhee has a real Hair Cuttery haircut going on in that picture of them with sunglasses, and Yolanda Hadid is lucky to be rid of that guy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
I’m surprised he had to pay very much. You’d think he would have had a prenup.

You're right, he did with Yolanda (and she allegedly had more millions than he had anyway). I was thinking more along the lines of this, although it could be way off:

While $30 million sounds like a relatively paltry sum for such a prolific producer, composer, musician and recording executive, Foster does have three other ex-wives and five daughters (and he's been a stepdad to six more kids), so his assets have already been dispersed more than once. And we can only imagine the hundreds of millions that may have been allocated for child-rearing and spousal support over the years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course a younger woman would want to have a baby. Foster is not known for lengthy marriages and this would guarantee the cash.

She's 34 and was married for 8 years. Why wouldn't she have had a baby already?

Because a baby with David Foster means a lifetime of $$. A baby with her previous husband, not so much.