DNC chair:ocasio Cortez represents the future of our party

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she represents the future of the Democratic Party, then we can be sure the Dems will have difficulty winning elections in the coming years.

Then why are you so incensed?

Republicans aren’t incensed — we are thrilled! More crazy Dems to alienate normal, hardworking American voters! The Democrats are rapidly becoming the Party of Moonbats.

Republicans have an actual Nazi running for Congress.

Tell the whole story, Jeff. The person running has identified as a Nazi and cannot be stopped by the GOP from running under that state's laws.

The only thing they can do is put forth a write-in campaign to stop the shenanigans. For all we know, it's a democrat running in Nazi drag for the headlines.

Democrats don’t need to do that. Actual Republicans keep running REAL confirmed Nazis and Holocaust Deniers, not to mention accused child molesters. Voting for Nazis to own the libs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Socialism is such a scary word. Can you point out her specific policies with which you disagree? Or is your issue one of vocabulary?

Yes, her positions are incompatible with private property rights. Just implementing taxes so you can have your dream utopia (free healthcare, a government job for everyone, free education, housing as a human right, etc., etc.,etc.) through "the collective" is not what the founders envisioned.

Why should anyone bother working? So they can pay 80% of their pay check to her to spend as she sees fit? It's childish nonsense. You realize there are economic realities and money doesn't grow on trees, right?



I'm surprised you even had to ask the question.

Jeff, can you answer this whilst you are at it? Do you believe in private property rights?

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Socialism is such a scary word. Can you point out her specific policies with which you disagree? Or is your issue one of vocabulary?

Yes, her positions are incompatible with private property rights. Just implementing taxes so you can have your dream utopia (free healthcare, a government job for everyone, free education, housing as a human right, etc., etc.,etc.) through "the collective" is not what the founders envisioned.

Why should anyone bother working? So they can pay 80% of their pay check to her to spend as she sees fit? It's childish nonsense. You realize there are economic realities and money doesn't grow on trees, right?



I'm surprised you even had to ask the question.

Jeff, can you answer this whilst you are at it? Do you believe in private property rights?

Yes, of course I believe in property rights. What kind of stupid question in that?

[Anonymous]

How do Republicans run REAL confirmed Nazis? Is there monetary backing from the party?

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Socialism is such a scary word. Can you point out her specific policies with which you disagree? Or is your issue one of vocabulary?

Yes, her positions are incompatible with private property rights. Just implementing taxes so you can have your dream utopia (free healthcare, a government job for everyone, free education, housing as a human right, etc., etc.,etc.) through "the collective" is not what the founders envisioned.

Why should anyone bother working? So they can pay 80% of their pay check to her to spend as she sees fit? It's childish nonsense. You realize there are economic realities and money doesn't grow on trees, right?



I'm surprised you even had to ask the question.

Jeff, can you answer this whilst you are at it? Do you believe in private property rights?

Yes, of course I believe in property rights. What kind of stupid question in that?

Welp, going back to your original statement - "Can you point out her specific policies with which you disagree? "

I gave you a litany. You never responded in how you stand on her positions.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Socialism is such a scary word. Can you point out her specific policies with which you disagree? Or is your issue one of vocabulary?

Yes, her positions are incompatible with private property rights. Just implementing taxes so you can have your dream utopia (free healthcare, a government job for everyone, free education, housing as a human right, etc., etc.,etc.) through "the collective" is not what the founders envisioned.

Why should anyone bother working? So they can pay 80% of their pay check to her to spend as she sees fit? It's childish nonsense. You realize there are economic realities and money doesn't grow on trees, right?



I'm surprised you even had to ask the question.

Jeff, can you answer this whilst you are at it? Do you believe in private property rights?

Yes, of course I believe in property rights. What kind of stupid question in that?

Welp, going back to your original statement - "Can you point out her specific policies with which you disagree? "

I gave you a litany. You never responded in how you stand on her positions.

I support her positions. There was not one with which I disagreed. I'm not sure what that has to do with property rights.

[Anonymous]

Well, you have to confiscate private property to pay for her positions.

Is this rocket surgery?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How do Republicans run REAL confirmed Nazis? Is there monetary backing from the party?

Jones, former head of the Nazi party got 20,000 Illinois Republicans to vote for him. And he’s not alone. There are seven other similar GOP candidates running around the country.


https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/republican-holocaust-deniers-697379/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How do Republicans run REAL confirmed Nazis? Is there monetary backing from the party?

Jones, former head of the Nazi party got 20,000 Illinois Republicans to vote for him. And he’s not alone. There are seven other similar GOP candidates running around the country.


https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/republican-holocaust-deniers-697379/

I'm not sure democrats didn't vote for him also.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well, you have to confiscate private property to pay for her positions.

Is this rocket surgery?

Clariification: You earn income (that is private property). Part of that is taken to fund the legitimate functions of government.

Then there's the "wish list" which is not Constitutional and yes, downright socialistic.

Just because someone wants stuff doesn't mean they are entitled to it. Just because the "collective" wants it doesn't make them entitled to it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How do Republicans run REAL confirmed Nazis? Is there monetary backing from the party?

Jones, former head of the Nazi party got 20,000 Illinois Republicans to vote for him. And he’s not alone. There are seven other similar GOP candidates running around the country.


https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/republican-holocaust-deniers-697379/

I'm not sure democrats didn't vote for him also.

Illinois has a closed primary system, so no, no Democrats have voted for him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How do Republicans run REAL confirmed Nazis? Is there monetary backing from the party?

Jones, former head of the Nazi party got 20,000 Illinois Republicans to vote for him. And he’s not alone. There are seven other similar GOP candidates running around the country.


https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/republican-holocaust-deniers-697379/

I'm not sure democrats didn't vote for him also.

I’m sure. Illinois primary voters have to declare what party they belong to before voting.

https://www.ilnews.org/news/state_politics/election-reform-group-illinois-unique-in-voters-publicly-declaring-party/article_78885c56-2934-11e8-8167-435bc674fbda.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, you have to confiscate private property to pay for her positions.

Is this rocket surgery?

Clariification: You earn income (that is private property). Part of that is taken to fund the legitimate functions of government.

Then there's the "wish list" which is not Constitutional and yes, downright socialistic.

Just because someone wants stuff doesn't mean they are entitled to it. Just because the "collective" wants it doesn't make them entitled to it.

A couple of questions. Do you think that Trump is making America great again? And if so, when do you think America was “great” before?

[Anonymous]

Did anyone watched her interview on Israel Palestine issues? I have hard time to believe she graduated from college. Yeh, yeh, instead yes. Bleh

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone watched her interview on Israel Palestine issues? I have hard time to believe she graduated from college. Yeh, yeh, instead yes. Bleh

It was painful. She had no clue what she was talking about. And why is the Israel/Palestine issue such a partisan topic and why exactly was it important enough to bring up in an interview at this point? Is the Israel/Palestine conflict important enough to any of you, as Americans, that a politician's position on the subject is something you consider when voting?