One easy thing to do to close the achievement gap

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The Ps grading system is only one part of MCPS's avoidance of transparency.

Consider:

Around the time my college student started K, MCPS was revising their grading system. If a student attempted homework, they would receive a minimum of 50%. If a student did poorly on a test they could be reassessed. Extra credit would no longer be given, but if a student attempted an assignment, the minimum grade they could get on it (if it was graded) was 50%. Most homework was not graded, but merely checked for completion.

In practice, tests in elementary never came home. They were county-wide assessments and sending them home would compromise their security. Instead parents got summary reports with information stating the student's scores for both on-grade level and above grade level items. Each score would have three ranges denoting whether the scores demonstrated complee understanding, developing understanding, or minimal understanding. There was no way for the parents to see which questions had been missed or why they had been missed. The kids did review the tests in class, but then they had to return them rather than being able to keep them for future reference.

Meanwhile, for writing assignments, I was informed by a curriculum developer that teachers were only supposed to correct a selection of errors, focusing on a specific subsection. For example, this paper the teacher might correct capitalization, another paper they might correct punctuation. It was thought that correcting all errors would be too demoralizing.

Report cards for K-2 used (O)utstanding, (S)atisfactory, and (N)eeds Improvement. Grades 3-5 had letter grades (A-E), but the really informative part were the Teacher Comments included with the report cards.

In 2012, the elementary report card was changed. Gone were letter grades and teacher comments. Ps covered a wide range of achievement ranging from mastery to barely passing. It was apparently unclear what level of performance merited the top grade E, with reports that in some schools it was extremely rare.

When Algebra final exam failure rates became so high it created a controversy, they decided the answer was to eliminate finals.

Here's a reference to the crisis in Forbes. Bad press for "one of the best school systems in the nation".

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/stuartanderson/2014/06/30/an-82-percent-failure-rate-on-high-school-algebra-exams/amp/

If MCPS is returning to letter grades for elementary report cards I applaud them for moving in the right direction. I would argue, however, that it is only the first step in a long road needed to give students and parents an accurate accounting of a student's performance.


What teacher comments? We got nothing.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Ps grading system is only one part of MCPS's avoidance of transparency.

Consider:

Around the time my college student started K, MCPS was revising their grading system. If a student attempted homework, they would receive a minimum of 50%. If a student did poorly on a test they could be reassessed. Extra credit would no longer be given, but if a student attempted an assignment, the minimum grade they could get on it (if it was graded) was 50%. Most homework was not graded, but merely checked for completion.

In practice, tests in elementary never came home. They were county-wide assessments and sending them home would compromise their security. Instead parents got summary reports with information stating the student's scores for both on-grade level and above grade level items. Each score would have three ranges denoting whether the scores demonstrated complee understanding, developing understanding, or minimal understanding. There was no way for the parents to see which questions had been missed or why they had been missed. The kids did review the tests in class, but then they had to return them rather than being able to keep them for future reference.

Meanwhile, for writing assignments, I was informed by a curriculum developer that teachers were only supposed to correct a selection of errors, focusing on a specific subsection. For example, this paper the teacher might correct capitalization, another paper they might correct punctuation. It was thought that correcting all errors would be too demoralizing.

Report cards for K-2 used (O)utstanding, (S)atisfactory, and (N)eeds Improvement. Grades 3-5 had letter grades (A-E), but the really informative part were the Teacher Comments included with the report cards.

In 2012, the elementary report card was changed. Gone were letter grades and teacher comments. Ps covered a wide range of achievement ranging from mastery to barely passing. It was apparently unclear what level of performance merited the top grade E, with reports that in some schools it was extremely rare.

When Algebra final exam failure rates became so high it created a controversy, they decided the answer was to eliminate finals.

Here's a reference to the crisis in Forbes. Bad press for "one of the best school systems in the nation".

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/stuartanderson/2014/06/30/an-82-percent-failure-rate-on-high-school-algebra-exams/amp/

If MCPS is returning to letter grades for elementary report cards I applaud them for moving in the right direction. I would argue, however, that it is only the first step in a long road needed to give students and parents an accurate accounting of a student's performance.


What teacher comments? We got nothing.


My kids had teacher comments on their report cards at two different elementary schools from the fall of 2004 to the spring of 2012.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Has anyone thought about it that the Assessment and the standardized test are biased against minority groups? It is like buying shoes. A certain brand of shoes are narrow and looks beautiful but it doesn't fit your feet well. You need to find a pair of shoes that fit your feet not shave your feet to fit the shoes. If the current education standards and methods consistently fail a large group of people, a different approach and standard should be created to fit the population.


How is the math assessment biased against black and Latinos? Math is the same EVERYWHERE around the world, and billions of kids, including those living in third-world countries, somehow master linear and -- gasp! - even quadratic equations.

You are saying minority groups in this country need different standards? Well, let's drop math, English and science altogether and study rap. The grades will go through the roof.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I live in a middle class neighborhood of single family homes. Last year, our neighborhood school bus-stop had five students (all boys) in the 3rd grade. They had grown up together, the moms were friends and occasionally had coffee together. Three of the students had got into the magnet HGC program, one was moving to another neighborhood and one was continuing on the home school. The home school student was Hispanic. The mom was feeling very sad that her son had not got into HGC program. She said that her son was getting all "P"s, just like every other student.

I told her that actually the "P" means nothing. It is a range of scores from 50-100% and that it is meaningless. She asked why would MCPS do that? She said that she would prefer that her son got home the correct measure of where he stood in all subjects. Not only a grade card that had A, B, C and D, but a grade card that gave his results in percentage.

Why would MCPS not consider that? The gap in knowledge is minimal in Elementary Schools. If MCPS was honest with the parents where exactly the students were behind in the elementary levels then it would be easy to fill those gaps.


MCPS has done away with this grading methodology. They are now back to doing A, B, C, D but these are still not percentage based. I'm okay with them going back to this method and I feel like between this and the communications I have with my kid's teacher, that I have a great grasp my child's performance. At the ES level, I don't need to know percentages.


Its still overly subjective. We get very little work back and no regularly information from the teacher so all we get are subjective a, b's so we have no idea what it all means.


This has been our experience also so far this year.

Last year, we did not get single writing assignment returned graded. This year, we do get math work back, but still no writing feedback. Zero.

The kids do dozens of 'writing assignments', but they are either 'peer graded' or not graded at all. How does that benefit the kids?
post reply Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: