Paul Manafort Told to Surrender

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you think an indictment might change Trumpers’ minds?

If the indictment is for transactions and oaymensts before the election than no. And it shouldn’t. So far no collusion between Russia and Trump. Collusion between Hillary and Russia is now known.

Da, Ivan. Spellcheck and Grammarly not working in Moscow this am?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you think an indictment might change Trumpers’ minds?

If the indictment is for transactions and oaymensts before the election than no. And it shouldn’t. So far no collusion between Russia and Trump. Collusion between Hillary and Russia is now known.

Umm, no. Arresting Manafort and Gates does not somehow implicate Hillary.

[Anonymous]

Folks, this is going to be a long slog, don't expect everyone to get indicted in one day and don't expect the dots to be connected at the outset.

The fact is, Manafort should have been in jail years ago.

Trump certainly knows of his dealings and should have been smarter than to have him as a Campaign Manager.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you think an indictment might change Trumpers’ minds?

If the indictment is for transactions and oaymensts before the election than no. And it shouldn’t. So far no collusion between Russia and Trump. Collusion between Hillary and Russia is now known.

This is true. Add to this, that both men were ousted

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you think an indictment might change Trumpers’ minds?

If the indictment is for transactions and oaymensts before the election than no. And it shouldn’t. So far no collusion between Russia and Trump. Collusion between Hillary and Russia is now known.

Da, Ivan. Spellcheck and Grammarly not working in Moscow this am?

This type of response has become old and tired. And, terribly unoriginal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you think an indictment might change Trumpers’ minds?

If the indictment is for transactions and oaymensts before the election than no. And it shouldn’t. So far no collusion between Russia and Trump. Collusion between Hillary and Russia is now known.

This is true. Add to this, that both men were ousted

Oh, it's The Donald subreddit that is spinning this. Hi redditor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you think an indictment might change Trumpers’ minds?

If the indictment is for transactions and oaymensts before the election than no. And it shouldn’t. So far no collusion between Russia and Trump. Collusion between Hillary and Russia is now known.

This is true. Add to this, that both men were ousted

Oh, it's The Donald subreddit that is spinning this. Hi redditor.

The articles posted by liberals in this thread said they were ousted. Lol

[Anonymous]

No 'collusion.'Just alleged tax and paperwork failings during the time he worked 4 podesta group/Clinton Foundation. The lying msm bastards, and the mooks here lapping it up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you think an indictment might change Trumpers’ minds?

If the indictment is for transactions and oaymensts before the election than no. And it shouldn’t. So far no collusion between Russia and Trump. Collusion between Hillary and Russia is now known.

This is true. Add to this, that both men were ousted

Their attempt to find a one month employee who is charged with tax issues and liberals are counting this as some evidence of collusion.

Reeeeee!

[Anonymous]

Who is the one month employee??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thank goodness CNN had it right. I am disappointed though. I thought it would be Flynn. How's it looking on Fox News?

No mention on Fox News when I was watching earlier. Don't worry about Flynn. His is coming. And these are just the tip of the iceberg.

Was just watching FoxNews. They had a hard-hitting piece discussing whether Irish people can be considered white. I'm not even lying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Folks, this is going to be a long slog, don't expect everyone to get indicted in one day and don't expect the dots to be connected at the outset.

The fact is, Manafort should have been in jail years ago.

Trump certainly knows of his dealings and should have been smarter than to have him as a C Iampaign Manager.

Maybe t-rump's Russian manager instructed him to hire Manafort!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thank goodness CNN had it right. I am disappointed though. I thought it would be Flynn. How's it looking on Fox News?

No mention on Fox News when I was watching earlier. Don't worry about Flynn. His is coming. And these are just the tip of the iceberg.

Was just watching FoxNews. They had a hard-hitting piece discussing whether Irish people can be considered white. I'm not even lying.

They’re not news but GOP propaganda. You won’t find anything of substance there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you think an indictment might change Trumpers’ minds?

If the indictment is for transactions and oaymensts before the election than no. And it shouldn’t. So far no collusion between Russia and Trump. Collusion between Hillary and Russia is now known.

Da, Ivan. Spellcheck and Grammarly not working in Moscow this am?

This type of response has become old and tired. And, terribly unoriginal.

The response isn't justified. It's the original Russian talking point that is old, tired, unoriginal, and completely false.

[Anonymous]

They were talking about Halloween candy and an economist talking about patriotism earlier.

Guess they are waiting to get the official spin first.