CNN reporter tweet on Trump's handshake with Polish First Lady

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:THIS is what is keeping Trumpkins up at night? The MSMs oh so unfair coverage (yet accurate) coverage of Rump's.handshake with the First Lady? Ya'll be some super special snowflakes.

And this is what passes for journalism in the liberal media these days?

I wouldn't generalize from one tweet by one guy who works for one cable news organization to "journalism in the liberal media these days".

Just as I wouldn't generalize from one tweet by one guy who is president of one country to "presidential behavior in the world these days".

I wasn't generalizing by one tweet from the CNN guy. CNN is ridiculous these days.

OK. I think that the president of the US is ridiculous these days.

Yeah, I can't stand him personally, either. But I like his policies better than Hillary's, so I went there. Mainly illegal immigration, THE SCOTUS, and corporate tax rates, in that order.

For me it was more personal. I couldn't stand the idea of Hillary Rodham Clinton being the first female president given her history. We woman deserved better than that.

[Anonymous]

Women^^

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:THIS is what is keeping Trumpkins up at night? The MSMs oh so unfair coverage (yet accurate) coverage of Rump's.handshake with the First Lady? Ya'll be some super special snowflakes.

And this is what passes for journalism in the liberal media these days?

I wouldn't generalize from one tweet by one guy who works for one cable news organization to "journalism in the liberal media these days".

Just as I wouldn't generalize from one tweet by one guy who is president of one country to "presidential behavior in the world these days".

I wasn't generalizing by one tweet from the CNN guy. CNN is ridiculous these days.

OK. I think that the president of the US is ridiculous these days.

Yeah, I can't stand him personally, either. But I like his policies better than Hillary's, so I went there. Mainly illegal immigration, THE SCOTUS, and corporate tax rates, in that order.

For me it was more personal. I couldn't stand the idea of Hillary Rodham Clinton being the first female president given her history. We woman deserved better than that.

You thought TRUMP was better for women?

Oh that's hilarious. Hilarious I tell you.

[Anonymous]

For me it was more personal. I couldn't stand the idea of Hillary Rodham Clinton being the first female president given her history. We woman deserved better than that.

You thought TRUMP was better for women?

Oh that's hilarious. Hilarious I tell you.

No pp. It is because as a woman, I felt Hillary Clinton wasn't good enough to be our first woman president. I want a woman who is above reproach i.e, certainly not the character traits (lying, scheming, bitter, angry) that Hillary Clinton shows.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN obviously made a business decision to go extreme left, figuring there are enough crazy liberals to make it a smart financial decision. Very sad to see a once-respected and fairly objective news source behaving like spoiled sore losers.

What do you expect from a network founded by Ted Turner?

Who was married to Hanoi Jane

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:THIS is what is keeping Trumpkins up at night? The MSMs oh so unfair coverage (yet accurate) coverage of Rump's.handshake with the First Lady? Ya'll be some super special snowflakes.

And this is what passes for journalism in the liberal media these days?

I wouldn't generalize from one tweet by one guy who works for one cable news organization to "journalism in the liberal media these days".

Just as I wouldn't generalize from one tweet by one guy who is president of one country to "presidential behavior in the world these days".

I wasn't generalizing by one tweet from the CNN guy. CNN is ridiculous these days.

It's pretty generally accepted that part of how Trump won is because CNN gave him SO MUCH AIRTIME. They'd cover his opening of an envelope. They gave him coverage for EVERY WORD HE SAID. It's pretty rich for you Trump supporters to come back and complain how mean CNN is after that. Unless, as I suspect, this is just part of your show - fake villains, rigged up fights, blah blah blah.

Love that ad revenue. They even got people to watch the aptly named Don ? Lemon

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:THIS is what is keeping Trumpkins up at night? The MSMs oh so unfair coverage (yet accurate) coverage of Rump's.handshake with the First Lady? Ya'll be some super special snowflakes.

And this is what passes for journalism in the liberal media these days?

I wouldn't generalize from one tweet by one guy who works for one cable news organization to "journalism in the liberal media these days".

Just as I wouldn't generalize from one tweet by one guy who is president of one country to "presidential behavior in the world these days".

I wasn't generalizing by one tweet from the CNN guy. CNN is ridiculous these days.

OK. I think that the president of the US is ridiculous these days.

Yeah, I can't stand him personally, either. But I like his policies better than Hillary's, so I went there. Mainly illegal immigration, THE SCOTUS, and corporate tax rates, in that order.

For me it was more personal. I couldn't stand the idea of Hillary Rodham Clinton being the first female president given her history. We woman deserved better than that.

Glass ceiling, what do we tell our daughters, pink pussy hats, I'm with her, onward together, pantsuit nation, resistance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:THIS is what is keeping Trumpkins up at night? The MSMs oh so unfair coverage (yet accurate) coverage of Rump's.handshake with the First Lady? Ya'll be some super special snowflakes.

And this is what passes for journalism in the liberal media these days?

I wouldn't generalize from one tweet by one guy who works for one cable news organization to "journalism in the liberal media these days".

Just as I wouldn't generalize from one tweet by one guy who is president of one country to "presidential behavior in the world these days".

I wasn't generalizing by one tweet from the CNN guy. CNN is ridiculous these days.

OK. I think that the president of the US is ridiculous these days.

Yeah, I can't stand him personally, either. But I like his policies better than Hillary's, so I went there. Mainly illegal immigration, THE SCOTUS, and corporate tax rates, in that order.

For me it was more personal. I couldn't stand the idea of Hillary Rodham Clinton being the first female president given her history. We woman deserved better than that.

Glass ceiling, what do we tell our daughters, pink pussy hats, I'm with her, onward together, pantsuit nation, resistance.

Well, we could start with reminding our daughters not to lie, cheat or steal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We need honest, straight-shooting, neutral media. CNN, Fox, NY Times -- all glitter, all reasonably well-presented, but their biases make them untrustworthy.

As opposed to who - Breitbart, Daily Caller and the rest of conservative media which showed its true colors during the 8 years of Obama's presidency as being vastly more biased and dishonest than the so-called "fake" mainstream media?

Off your meds? Of course Breitbart, Daily Caller, etc. are right-wing media. They label themselves as such, quite proudly, and in that sense quite honestly. You go onto those sites knowing that, much like someone would go to the HuffPo, Slate, or the Daily Kos.

My point was about the loss of middle-of-the-road, straight-shooting, neutral media. CNN, Fox, NY Times, all "serious", but all horribly biased, and those biases bring them to the same level of Daily Caller and Daily Kos. The Washington Post has become unreadable.

Where do I go for one-stop, honest news?

Oh, puh-frickin leeze. They are nowhere near as bad as Daily Caller, Breitbart or for that matter Daily Kos.

Your problem is that facts and reality have a liberal bias these days. CNN reports something that Trump *actually* said, tweeted or did and you all go apeshit and scream "fake news" despite the fact that it's captured on videotape.

You just don't want to hear actual honest news.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:THIS is what is keeping Trumpkins up at night? The MSMs oh so unfair coverage (yet accurate) coverage of Rump's.handshake with the First Lady? Ya'll be some super special snowflakes.

And this is what passes for journalism in the liberal media these days?

I wouldn't generalize from one tweet by one guy who works for one cable news organization to "journalism in the liberal media these days".

Just as I wouldn't generalize from one tweet by one guy who is president of one country to "presidential behavior in the world these days".

I wasn't generalizing by one tweet from the CNN guy. CNN is ridiculous these days.

OK. I think that the president of the US is ridiculous these days.

Yeah, I can't stand him personally, either. But I like his policies better than Hillary's, so I went there. Mainly illegal immigration, THE SCOTUS, and corporate tax rates, in that order.

For me it was more personal. I couldn't stand the idea of Hillary Rodham Clinton being the first female president given her history. We woman deserved better than that.

Glass ceiling, what do we tell our daughters, pink pussy hats, I'm with her, onward together, pantsuit nation, resistance.

Well, we could start with reminding our daughters not to lie, cheat or steal.

Ouch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:THIS is what is keeping Trumpkins up at night? The MSMs oh so unfair coverage (yet accurate) coverage of Rump's.handshake with the First Lady? Ya'll be some super special snowflakes.

And this is what passes for journalism in the liberal media these days?

I wouldn't generalize from one tweet by one guy who works for one cable news organization to "journalism in the liberal media these days".

Just as I wouldn't generalize from one tweet by one guy who is president of one country to "presidential behavior in the world these days".

I wasn't generalizing by one tweet from the CNN guy. CNN is ridiculous these days.

OK. I think that the president of the US is ridiculous these days.

Yeah, I can't stand him personally, either. But I like his policies better than Hillary's, so I went there. Mainly illegal immigration, THE SCOTUS, and corporate tax rates, in that order.

For me it was more personal. I couldn't stand the idea of Hillary Rodham Clinton being the first female president given her history. We woman deserved better than that.

Glass ceiling, what do we tell our daughters, pink pussy hats, I'm with her, onward together, pantsuit nation, resistance.

Well, we could start with reminding our daughters not to lie, cheat or steal.

Ouch.

Or marry someone who does

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For me it was more personal. I couldn't stand the idea of Hillary Rodham Clinton being the first female president given her history. We woman deserved better than that.

You thought TRUMP was better for women?

Oh that's hilarious. Hilarious I tell you.

No pp. It is because as a woman, I felt Hillary Clinton wasn't good enough to be our first woman president. I want a woman who is above reproach i.e, certainly not the character traits (lying, scheming, bitter, angry) that Hillary Clinton shows.

So it was as a woman that you thought a lying, scheming, bitter, angry man was better. Okay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:THIS is what is keeping Trumpkins up at night? The MSMs oh so unfair coverage (yet accurate) coverage of Rump's.handshake with the First Lady? Ya'll be some super special snowflakes.

And this is what passes for journalism in the liberal media these days?

I wouldn't generalize from one tweet by one guy who works for one cable news organization to "journalism in the liberal media these days".

Just as I wouldn't generalize from one tweet by one guy who is president of one country to "presidential behavior in the world these days".

I wasn't generalizing by one tweet from the CNN guy. CNN is ridiculous these days.

OK. I think that the president of the US is ridiculous these days.

Yeah, I can't stand him personally, either. But I like his policies better than Hillary's, so I went there. Mainly illegal immigration, THE SCOTUS, and corporate tax rates, in that order.

For me it was more personal. I couldn't stand the idea of Hillary Rodham Clinton being the first female president given her history. We woman deserved better than that.

Glass ceiling, what do we tell our daughters, pink pussy hats, I'm with her, onward together, pantsuit nation, resistance.

Well, we could start with reminding our daughters not to lie, cheat or steal.

Ouch.

Or marry someone who does

So you, proud woman that you are, went with a man who not only lies, cheats, and steals, but is a thrice married man who has cheated on all three wives and bragged about grabbing women by their vaginas as a perk of his celebrity. His policies? Not pro-woman. To the contrary. Do you have any other "reasons" you voted for this con man other than you were unwilling to forgive HRC for her imperfections while overlooking - blindly - Trump's egregious imperfections.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We need honest, straight-shooting, neutral media. CNN, Fox, NY Times -- all glitter, all reasonably well-presented, but their biases make them untrustworthy.

As opposed to who - Breitbart, Daily Caller and the rest of conservative media which showed its true colors during the 8 years of Obama's presidency as being vastly more biased and dishonest than the so-called "fake" mainstream media?

Off your meds? Of course Breitbart, Daily Caller, etc. are right-wing media. They label themselves as such, quite proudly, and in that sense quite honestly. You go onto those sites knowing that, much like someone would go to the HuffPo, Slate, or the Daily Kos.

My point was about the loss of middle-of-the-road, straight-shooting, neutral media. CNN, Fox, NY Times, all "serious", but all horribly biased, and those biases bring them to the same level of Daily Caller and Daily Kos. The Washington Post has become unreadable.

Where do I go for one-stop, honest news?

Oh, puh-frickin leeze. They are nowhere near as bad as Daily Caller, Breitbart or for that matter Daily Kos.

Your problem is that facts and reality have a liberal bias these days. CNN reports something that Trump *actually* said, tweeted or did and you all go apeshit and scream "fake news" despite the fact that it's captured on videotape.

You just don't want to hear actual honest news.

Please, expound on that point, that "facts and reality have a liberal bias these days". Fascinating. When you present only those facts that are convenient to you, you are ignoring a series of, um, alternative facts, which of course leads to fake news (just to coin a couple of new phrases).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For me it was more personal. I couldn't stand the idea of Hillary Rodham Clinton being the first female president given her history. We woman deserved better than that.

You thought TRUMP was better for women?

Oh that's hilarious. Hilarious I tell you.

No pp. It is because as a woman, I felt Hillary Clinton wasn't good enough to be our first woman president. I want a woman who is above reproach i.e, certainly not the character traits (lying, scheming, bitter, angry) that Hillary Clinton shows.

So it was as a woman that you thought a lying, scheming, bitter, angry man was better. Okay.

No doubt, the first female President of the United States has to be very special, held to a high standard. For us and our daughters and grand daughters! She will a) lead our nation b) be an infamous woman role-model and c) go down in history as no other American woman will.

Hillary Clinton worked hard, no doubt. But sadly, she had a major character flaw, so deep that she was fired from her first legal job on Watergate investigation as being "unethical". This was the pattern for the rest of Hillary Clinton's life.

Let's hold ourselves as women, our daughters, to a higher standard than that. She was simply the wrong choice for the times. Biden should have run, and would have won.