Is winning by cheating ok with you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Answer the question. Do you believe cheating to beat Trump is morally ok? Yes or no

No. But no one is cheating on the left. The cheating comes from the right: Voter suppression. Voter intimidation. Gerrymandering (or why the house is republican).

Brazille, Wasserman-Schultz, Fogel, Creamer, the DOJ, SoS, media collusion etc

Address those. You go after voter fraud because you think that covers the above sins. Would the above be ok if they were republicans? No But it's ok because they are Dems

You are as crooked as they are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Isn't the only arrest for voting fraud thus far a Republican Trump supporter?

Yes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Answer the question. Do you believe cheating to beat Trump is morally ok? Yes or no

Only if you answer whether cheating to beat Clinton is morally ok. Yes or no.

j

A resounding no.i asked because of the way deems behave on this forum. Name calling, cat calling, viciousness, spewing hate at people they don't know. I assume that cheating is fine as a result.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't the only arrest for voting fraud thus far a Republican Trump supporter?

Yes.

d

Broward affidavit is huge. Election officials filling out ballots. One honest pollster turned them in.

[Anonymous]

Now exit poll data will be reported all day. More cheating - they can lie about it to try and get voters to stay home. Interestingly enough, it is a Bush/Obama team effort. What are they hiding?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Answer the question. Do you believe cheating to beat Trump is morally ok? Yes or no

No. But no one is cheating on the left. The cheating comes from the right: Voter suppression. Voter intimidation. Gerrymandering (or why the house is republican).

Brazille, Wasserman-Schultz, Fogel, Creamer, the DOJ, SoS, media collusion etc

Address those. You go after voter fraud because you think that covers the above sins. Would the above be ok if they were republicans? No But it's ok because they are Dems

You are as crooked as they are.

I'm no fan of Brazille or Wasserman-Schultz, but you need to do a little reading up on the history of political parties nominating their candidates. Parties are private entities. How a party nominates its candidate is not a matter of federal or state or local law. People might not like the system, but they are free to fight for changes within it or to start their own party/movement. Cry me a river if you are upset at how the Democratic Party tried to promote a particular candidate. Meanwhile I'm sure if you hacked the RNC emails you'd find an equally strong movement within it to stop Trump from getting the nomination.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_primary


As for media collusion, are you f'ing kidding me? The media has given Trump millions of dollars in free advertisement. They have concentrated not on substance and issues but on personality and anything that would give them ratings. Collusion? How about Corey Lewandowski being a paid CNN commentator at the same time he was still on the Trump campaign payroll? You want media collusion? Try FOX, Breitbart, Drudge report.

And stop spouting your DOJ nonsense. The FBI director has taken unprecedented steps in making public pronouncements - condemned by people of both parties, mind you-- that could leave an effect on a hotly contested election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Answer the question. Do you believe cheating to beat Trump is morally ok? Yes or no

No. But no one is cheating on the left. The cheating comes from the right: Voter suppression. Voter intimidation. Gerrymandering (or why the house is republican).

Brazille, Wasserman-Schultz, Fogel, Creamer, the DOJ, SoS, media collusion etc

Address those. You go after voter fraud because you think that covers the above sins. Would the above be ok if they were republicans? No But it's ok because they are Dems

You are as crooked as they are.

I'm no fan of Brazille or Wasserman-Schultz, but you need to do a little reading up on the history of political parties nominating their candidates. Parties are private entities. How a party nominates its candidate is not a matter of federal or state or local law. People might not like the system, but they are free to fight for changes within it or to start their own party/movement. Cry me a river if you are upset at how the Democratic Party tried to promote a particular candidate. Meanwhile I'm sure if you hacked the RNC emails you'd find an equally strong movement within it to stop Trump from getting the nomination.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_primary


As for media collusion, are you f'ing kidding me? The media has given Trump millions of dollars in free advertisement. They have concentrated not on substance and issues but on personality and anything that would give them ratings. Collusion? How about Corey Lewandowski being a paid CNN commentator at the same time he was still on the Trump campaign payroll? You want media collusion? Try FOX, Breitbart, Drudge report.

And stop spouting your DOJ nonsense. The FBI director has taken unprecedented steps in making public pronouncements - condemned by people of both parties, mind you-- that could leave an effect on a hotly contested election.

Promote? Feeding debate questions is promotion? The media tried to make a joke out of Trump, and the joke became on them.

As I thought, your long-winded answer is yes, you support cheating and lying and call it promotion

[Anonymous]

Just because you don't get your way does not make it cheating or a rigged election, Mr. Trump. It just means more people voted for the other candidate.

[Anonymous]

Typical violence from the left:

Hillary Fans Wave 'F*ck Trump,' Mexican Flag at Trump FL Rally http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/11/07/hillary-clinton-brawl-supporters-greet-trump-rally-f-ck-trump-mexican-flag/ via @BreitbartNews

[Anonymous]

The only documented voter fraud this election are from Trump supporters: https://news.vice.com/story/trump-supporters-keep-committing-voter-fraud

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just because you don't get your way does not make it cheating or a rigged election, Mr. Trump. It just means more people voted for the other candidate.

Did I say that? I asked if people thought the end justified the means. Seems so

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just because you don't get your way does not make it cheating or a rigged election, Mr. Trump. It just means more people voted for the other candidate.

Did I say that? I asked if people thought the end justified the means. Seems so

I am the PP you quoted and I don't think cheating is ok. If anything I think the GOP has made more attempts at cheating, like Comey and closing polling locations in the south in predominately black/poor areas. Both of those are an attempt to sway the election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Typical violence from the left:

Hillary Fans Wave 'F*ck Trump,' Mexican Flag at Trump FL Rally http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/11/07/hillary-clinton-brawl-supporters-greet-trump-rally-f-ck-trump-mexican-flag/ via @BreitbartNews

Um, waving a flag is not violence it's free speech! Racists should know all about the 1st amendment! The cite it enough.

[Anonymous]

Okay. So no. Cheating would not be okay to keep Trump out. And I am Never Trump. But if he won fair and square, then at least 51% of my fellow countrymen clearly saw something I didn't. I would like it. But I would accept it. And I would not condone cheating to change it. Or call the election rigged.


If I'm wrong and Trump wins find me tomorrow night, and I'll stand by this. I'll be unhappy. But I'll stand by it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Typical violence from the left:

Hillary Fans Wave 'F*ck Trump,' Mexican Flag at Trump FL Rally http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/11/07/hillary-clinton-brawl-supporters-greet-trump-rally-f-ck-trump-mexican-flag/ via @BreitbartNews

Um, waving a flag is not violence it's free speech! Racists should know all about the 1st amendment! The cite it enough.

You missed the violence part. They can wave a flag and scream profanities all they want. It's still bad behavior.