Would Hills ever get rid of Huma?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKt2zaOrxD8


just found this. Is it really true? I hope it's all fabricated.

I just watched it.

don't know what to think - But her mother's book makes me go hmmmmmm.

Can you please repost this link? Would love to see it.

18:27 posted this - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKt2zaOrxD8

Thanks for reposting. somehow info against HC doesn't survive very long in this forum.

Exactly. The astonishing facts in this clip are so damning to Hillary, I can't believe DCUM admin is allowing us to see it. It's really quite shocking.

[Anonymous]

Hillary gets her orders from the Royal Saudis. What did they give her? 25 MILLION dollars?

Huma will drive Hillary's America, like it or not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKt2zaOrxD8


just found this. Is it really true? I hope it's all fabricated.

I just watched it.

don't know what to think - But her mother's book makes me go hmmmmmm.

Can you please repost this link? Would love to see it.

18:27 posted this - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKt2zaOrxD8

Thanks for reposting. somehow info against HC doesn't survive very long in this forum.

Exactly. The astonishing facts in this clip are so damning to Hillary, I can't believe DCUM admin is allowing us to see it. It's really quite shocking.

Give it time - admin will be on with some excuse exonerating Huma and Islam. Personally, I don't get it. I'm Jewish and I readily admit that the Hasidic community is an issue in this country. Granted, they are not murdering people en masse, so there's that.

[Anonymous]

Hasn't Huma committed perjury? Didn't she declare under oath that she had provided the FBI with ALL electronic devices she had used for work? It would be one thing if the mistake were for a couple or even a couple dozen, but it is kind of a stretch to believe that she forgot she used another device for thousands of work related emails, regardless of the content of those emails.

So why would Hillary want to keep a possible felon on board?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hasn't Huma committed perjury? Didn't she declare under oath that she had provided the FBI with ALL electronic devices she had used for work? It would be one thing if the mistake were for a couple or even a couple dozen, but it is kind of a stretch to believe that she forgot she used another device for thousands of work related emails, regardless of the content of those emails.

So why would Hillary want to keep a possible felon on board?

Hillary will forever be held hostage by the Saudi government.
Their 25M investment will pay off handsomely if we put Hillary Clinton in the White House. They will do whatever it takes to make sure Hillary gets elected.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who's taking care of her child?

So much sexism in this one little sentence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who's taking care of her child?

So much sexism in this one little sentence.

Irrelevant on this thread. Keep up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:huma started working for her 2 years after she came back to US. wonder what kind of connections she had to land the job?

She was a student at GWU and worked as an intern.

I'm guessing she got the job because of her credentials and diversity etc.

GWU isn't a strong college, she only has a BA. How many unconnected GWU teenagers become personal confidants of the POTUS and his wife? It's pretty odd.

At least Doug Band is sharp GU BA, GU JD and has the smarts to branch off and start a consulting company. Huma is a 20 year assistant.

Maybe you went to Stanford or MIT? Because GWU is #56 among all the universities in this country. That is pretty impressive, just not elite.

http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/gwu-1444/overall-rankings

Are you claiming it's common for random non-connected teenagers at non elite colleges to get prestigious WH internships, let alone get plucked to become bff with POTUS and FLOTUS? It's extremely odd. And I watched the Showtime documentary - there's nothing brilliant about it.

Well qualified, bright students at GW and GT do get elite unpaid internships at the White House, Congress, DoD etc. Its a huge marketing point for colleges in DC. How can you be local and not know this?

[Anonymous]

The Hillary video people crack me up. Actually I think it's just one poster pretending to be more than one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKt2zaOrxD8


just found this. Is it really true? I hope it's all fabricated.

I just watched it.

don't know what to think - But her mother's book makes me go hmmmmmm.

Can you please repost this link? Would love to see it.

18:27 posted this - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKt2zaOrxD8

Thanks for reposting. somehow info against HC doesn't survive very long in this forum.

Agree. But there are plenty of us who are demanding the real facts on Huma & Hillary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Hillary video people crack me up. Actually I think it's just one poster pretending to be more than one.

I am one of them so there must be at least two

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Hillary video people crack me up. Actually I think it's just one poster pretending to be more than one.

Well, I'm actually another video poster. I viewed it, commented and reposted for the PP who asked.

Here's a completely opposite view - https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/08/25/does-huma-abedin-have-ties-to-the-muslim-brotherhood/
Does Huma Abedin have ‘ties’ to the Muslim Brotherhood? (fact checker)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Hillary video people crack me up. Actually I think it's just one poster pretending to be more than one.

Well, I'm actually another video poster. I viewed it, commented and reposted for the PP who asked.

Here's a completely opposite view - https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/08/25/does-huma-abedin-have-ties-to-the-muslim-brotherhood/
Does Huma Abedin have ‘ties’ to the Muslim Brotherhood? (fact checker)

WaPo? Lol. Better yet:
Is Huma's Mama an active member of The Muslim Sisterhood?
Has Huma spoken against this? No. Huma has a very important mission. She and Hillary are forever connected at the hip. No worries about that, no matter what.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Hillary video people crack me up. Actually I think it's just one poster pretending to be more than one.

Well, I'm actually another video poster. I viewed it, commented and reposted for the PP who asked.

Here's a completely opposite view - https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/08/25/does-huma-abedin-have-ties-to-the-muslim-brotherhood/
Does Huma Abedin have ‘ties’ to the Muslim Brotherhood? (fact checker)

WaPo? Lol. Better yet:
Is Huma's Mama an active member of The Muslim Sisterhood?
Has Huma spoken against this? No. Huma has a very important mission. She and Hillary are forever connected at the hip. No worries about that, no matter what.

Hey, here's the thing, poster - I not a Hillary fan, but unless you look at both sides - which both lie and which both include nuggets of truth - you'll never get the big picture. So if you stick with only right wing or left wing sources, you'll only present one side to your opponent. If you find the flaws in your opponent's case, then you can one up him/her.

That's what research does; it opens up the issue, as there are always two sides to every issue. Simply slamming Hillary (and I can't stand her) will only shut out your opponent.

I wish both sides would see this. I guess that since I can't stand either candidate it's easy for me to slice into both, which isn't the case for people favoring one over the other.

Open your eyes and read all you can - from Breitbart to WaPo to Huff Post to The Atlantic to CNN to Free Republic, etc. I do, and then I piece it together.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who's taking care of her child?

So much sexism in this one little sentence.

Is it sexism to point out that women are the ones who can get pregnant, give birth, and nurse their children?