Thank you. |
Would you mind sharing some links? |
PP - I do plan to do this. We leave for Mexico and will be gone a week. I'll do it when we come back and to look for you will try to post here first. If I don't hear from you, I will create a post titled ABCDAssessment. Hopefully you will see it.
|
Why is this? It is perplexing to me. |
| + 100 on all of the comments on FCPS. And I loved the special ed teacher at our ES as well as all of DS's classroom teachers. But, FCPS just doesn't give the schools and teachers the tools they need to accommodate dyslexia. So, private school tuition it is so DS can finally learn to read! |
| Schools don't put dyslexia on the paperwork because that is not one of the federally recognized categories. They have categories of disability (each with its own code) and they put the code for the primary (not the only) on the paperwork. Schools do not make diagnoses. They look for strengths and weaknesses and determine whether the weaknesses meet the criteria for disability. That disability must have an educational impact which inhibits the ability to access the curriculum. Once it is determined that the weakness rises to the level of a disability, proper programming is determined. So, in essence, the dyslexia label does not matter. They are tasked with determining the programming to address the disability regardless of its name. That may be small group, decoding classes or something else. It depends on the results of testing and teacher feedback. Teachers in most states are not required to be certified or even trained in an Orton-Gillingham based reading program. This is a very expensive and time consuming process which requires 8 months of supervision. That would require additional time to graduate, high tuition in college, and/or, once employed, a drain on tax payer money. If this certification or training were required by the state, we would have few qualified people to hire. |
Hope you have a great trip! |
RE: FCPS and dyslexia -- Here are the slides from a presentation on dyslexia from 2014 to parents http://www.fcps.edu/dss/osp/prc/resources/events/documents/PRCDyslexiaHandout2014.pdf 66 slides and only ONE of them talks about strategies or techniques for helping students learn to decode. (The "break apart strategy" for breaking multisyllable words into chunks.) This despite the fact that intense, explicit and systematic instruction in phonemic awareness, phonics and other decoding skills are what have been shown to actually remediate dyslexia. There should be a LOT more emphasis put on what systematic, explicit instruction is available to students, especially those in upper elementary or middle school who might still need basic decoding instruction NOT just modifications and accommodations to help them get through the text by listening to it read aloud, us using picture cues to guess. The reason schools do not provide more explicit decoding instruction past 3rd grade is that it would usually need to be done one one one and that is not cost effective. |
| Check out Lab School of Washington. The speech language department - specifically, Jim Ross. He's amazing. |
Is this sarcasm? About 17% of children have dyslexia. |