KKK is actually backing Hilllary Clinton

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hillary has not denounce this story...must be true...Hillary is a support of the KKK.

why not? this is how Trump was treated. I agree, this must be true (as long as it's the California Klan--any other would be illegitimate).

Why has no reporter ask Hillary about this? Double standard?

Why don't you ask her?

Impossible she would never let some random Jane Joe ask a question. It would be too off scripted and she would send her thugs after you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hillary has not denounce this story...must be true...Hillary is a support of the KKK.

why not? this is how Trump was treated. I agree, this must be true (as long as it's the California Klan--any other would be illegitimate).

Why has no reporter ask Hillary about this? Double standard?

Why don't you ask her?

Impossible she would never let some random Jane Joe ask a question. It would be too off scripted and she would send her thugs after you.

You're delusional

[Anonymous]

She still hasn't discredited this endorsement....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She still hasn't discredited this endorsement....

Did anyone ask her about it?
Trump was asked about it.

Get back to us when she's asked

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She still hasn't discredited this endorsement....

Did anyone ask her about it?
Trump was asked about it.

Get back to us when she's asked

David Duke was a one-time presidential candidate and someone whose name and affiliation with the KKK are known to many. This clown? Not so much. Stop being a moron.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

David Duke was a one-time presidential candidate and someone whose name and affiliation with the KKK are known to many. This clown? Not so much. Stop being a moron.

Yay, Name calling! I LIKE name-calling, can I play along too?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She still hasn't discredited this endorsement....

Did anyone ask her about it?
Trump was asked about it.

Get back to us when she's asked

David Duke was a one-time presidential candidate and someone whose name and affiliation with the KKK are known to many. This clown? Not so much. Stop being a moron.

So was Jessie Jackson, Vermin Supreme, James Traficant and Roseanne Barr. Stop being an imbecile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She still hasn't discredited this endorsement....

Did anyone ask her about it?
Trump was asked about it.

Get back to us when she's asked

You think she'll allow such a question?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She still hasn't discredited this endorsement....

Did anyone ask her about it?
Trump was asked about it.

Get back to us when she's asked

You think she'll allow such a question?

Pfft never in a million years, unless it's slipped in unannounced.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She still hasn't discredited this endorsement....

Did anyone ask her about it?
Trump was asked about it.

Get back to us when she's asked

You think she'll allow such a question?

Pfft never in a million years, unless it's slipped in unannounced.

"Allow"? Any reporter can ask the question. She can walk off if she doesn't like it. But honestly, no one takes what this guy said seriously, except butthurt Trump supporters.

Of course if you would rather believe that Hillary Clinton is secretly plotting to close the border, please admit that in print.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She still hasn't discredited this endorsement....

Did anyone ask her about it?
Trump was asked about it.

Get back to us when she's asked

You think she'll allow such a question?

Pfft never in a million years, unless it's slipped in unannounced.

We may never know. She's being going 3 months or so at a time without answering any questions.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/01/breaking-hillary-clinton-actually-takes-questions-from-reporters-after-87-days/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She still hasn't discredited this endorsement....

Did anyone ask her about it?
Trump was asked about it.

Get back to us when she's asked

You think she'll allow such a question?

Pfft never in a million years, unless it's slipped in unannounced.

We may never know. She's being going 3 months or so at a time without answering any questions.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/01/breaking-hillary-clinton-actually-takes-questions-from-reporters-after-87-days/

She doesn't gaggle with the traveling press, but she does a lot of local and national interviews. In fact, she's done exclusive interviews with some press who continue to complain that she won't gaggle. In general, the losing candidates and Trump give the most press conferences. Trump gives them after almost every primary, complete with fabulous amenities.

I personally think she should do more press conferences, but the coverage of Trump is pretty much nonstop.

[Anonymous]

what do you consider "a lot"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She still hasn't discredited this endorsement....

Did anyone ask her about it?
Trump was asked about it.

Get back to us when she's asked

You think she'll allow such a question?

Pfft never in a million years, unless it's slipped in unannounced.

"Allow"? Any reporter can ask the question. She can walk off if she doesn't like it. But honestly, no one takes what this guy said seriously, except butthurt Trump supporters.

Of course if you would rather believe that Hillary Clinton is secretly plotting to close the border, please admit that in print.

Of course she isn’t. Quite the opposite. HRC has promised not to deport anyone here illegally.
Illegal immigration will only get worse under a Clinton presidency.

[Anonymous]

And yet another day has gone by without a rebuke.