Well then it must be true! Had kids at public for nearly all elementary and facilities when we switched to private generally and in these specific areas, way better. Just my personal,experience, but our public was very well rated. |
|
Of course, I would pick private all over again. We live in DC and I would never subject my kid to the DC publics. We live in a tiny, tiny place so that we could afford it.
|
She says from her ivory tower... |
+1 Same situation for us...I do expect that some of these deficits that are critical to development will diminish in later years, and I hope to return my child to public by middle school. Perhaps even as early as 4th grade. The differences in how they learn and the curriculum limitations in MCPS really do seem to lessen in later years (at least for us, with the cluster where we live). |
It really depends on the publics she's referring to. |
|
|
If we lived in Manhattan, or London, I would have to say it would be private schools, all the way.
However, here in the DC area we have a different set up. Public schools would be our only choice. We've been on the inside of privates here, (big 3) and they have been sorely lacking. |
|
Since my child is already in private school, things like better/easier access to drama productions, athletics, music groups are wonderful. They're part of what would make it hard to leave. However, if my child had thrived in public school, we could have spent quite a bit less than what we pay in tuition to get her access to extra curricular drama, sports, and music.
That's why I, as a parent of a child in private school, generally recommend to people to check out their public school first. If it's an acceptable environment for your child, save that money you'd spend on tuition and put it towards the areas you feel are lacking in public. Unfortunately sometimes the available public school is not an appropriate fit for the child, and then you're stuck. |
Not all publics are actually lacking. I know the ES schools in MOCO don't teach foreign languages (unless they are a language school) but frankly I don't want my kids spending an hour a day on this at this stage anyway. |
You don't want your kids exposed to the unique sounds of another language at an age when it is most beneficial? |
| Top rated AAP Center in FCPS, with first DC a TJ finalist. Why would we pay for private? I have yet to find one with the acadamic rigor of DC's MS. |
If they were natural linguists, certainly. But they are not. And yes, you can spot the natural linguists at an early age (I am one myself - 5 languages) so there's not any point stuffing a poor kid who doesn't want to and cannot grapple with Spanish, into a school which makes them do Spanish (or whatever language they offer). |
NP here. if I had to do it over again, I would absolutely go straight to private with my older child (with SN's that the county deemed not severe enough for services). Knowing what I know now (specifically about my neighborhood school) I would skip public for my DD and go straight to private. If we lived in a different neighborhood I might start with public and move to private if necessary though. |
I attended both private and public school. My daughter started in private and once we moved we put her in our local public. At first she was nervous and hesitant. Now when I ask if she wants to return, she says she'll never return to private. Our public offers much more than most privates. My son started in public and comes home each day very happy. |
|
Our situation is a bit unusual, since I have expat benefits that cover 3/4 of private school tuition. We live in a great school district in Fairfax County. One of our kids is in private and the other one is in the local public. (We moved DC1 from private to public to respond to the need to be fully challenged in math.)
So I really think it's all about a good fit for the child. |