Uh did you even read my post? The army is government. And state racing commissions, which are part of government, legislate jockey weights. |
That's for the safety of the horses. And the military is a special case. Remember that it's perfectly legal for the military to ban women from combat, gays from service, trannies from service etc. (in some cases they have voluntarily life's those restrictions, but the point is that the military is a special case). |
No it's not, you liar. The weight limit is a lowest allowable amount, for the safety of the jockey. And of course the military is always a special case. And the airline industry is private industry. An all of the state commission rules for weight in boxing, when you can rehydrate and how, are for what? Oh the safety of the spectators? And FAA mandatory medical screenings for pilots with a BMI of 40? Yes, yes, everything must be a special case, except for models. |
This point about companies versus government keeps getting brought up but without a coherent point to be made.
The difference between an company imposing something on the public vs. government imposing something on the public = perception and ideology as opposed to reality. |
Betcha the big girl's a whole lot more fun in bed than the skinny one. |
So much for what you know. Anna Carolina Reston died at 21 of kidney failure. The plus-sized model above is still alive at 30. |
|
Isn't this an example of a collective action problem? All those who use models know that they are promoting ill health by hiring too skinny models, but thinness is everywhere acclaimed and if one moves unilaterally it will be at a disadvantage.
If government stepped in and forbade use of models under a certain BMI no one would be at a disadvantage. But the federal government has no authority here unless one can make an interstate commerce case. That leaves this in the hands of industry groups, but they are faced with the problem of how to make cheating more painful than it is worth. |
The article said there is no minimum. Models just need a doctor's note saying they are healthy enough to handle the profession. |
| I can't believe anyone is terribly inconvenienced by being asked to add five pounds in order to go on a catwalk. |
For the adult models? Probably very little problem in adding five pounds. They're naturally thin and all, but they still work at looking amazing. A "problem" with this is that many of the models are still basically children - which the industry collectively loves. So it's not just an unattainably thin body, but the teenaged shape we tend to lose somewhere around our early twenties. |
Teenagers need not be models. Why should they be? |
I can't understand the wisdom of modeling adult clothing on childrens' bodies. |
|
Who is the designer who put the skeletal Ms. Reston on the catwalk?
I want to boycott him or her forever for such callous disregard of human life. |
Did you read the thread (off topic) about finding a "credible" children's modeling agency? Parents see ka ching and instantly whore off their kids. |
There're age-appropriate jobs (I think we can all agree that Seventeen and Teen Vogue fashion spreads should be modeled by teens!) and there're completely inappropriate jobs. I wouldn't allow my children to model, but recognize that a need exists. But why are clothes intended for adult women - perhaps 1-3% of whom will keep a truly teenaged-shaped body well into adulthood - designed and fitted with 15 year olds in mind? And why is their natural body fat level - unnatural to many normal, healthy-weight adult women - the enforced standard on the runway? |