Ever wonder what is wrong with the school and parents for handling the child that wAy and not giving him the supports he needs. This thread is not about a child with behavioral problems or special needs. That's a very different topic. |
| If parents want play based, keep your child in preschool another year. School is to learn. I do not get all the concerns as kids in preschool should have the tools they need to make the transition. Maybe preschool is the issue and play based is not giving the kids what they need. |
She can't afford private and she is a big believer in hitting her kids. She uses a belt on his because he is so bad. She just doesn't know any better and he is a handful. |
You seem to believe that the sole definition of learning is "acquiring knowledge about academic subjects via paper and pencil while sitting at a desk." I do not share this belief. |
Oh dear. Lots of problems here. I am sad for your friend's son. |
My kids have plenty of opportunities for play and sports outside school. Parents cannot expect the schools to do everything and their primary goal is to educate. If your child needs more, then as a parent it is your job to provide that. |
In other words, yes, you do believe that the sole definition of learning (and education!) is acquiring knowledge about academic subjects via paper and pencil while sitting at a desk. |
Yes, schools are not babysitters and are there to educate/learn. That is why our country is falling so behind others in academics. |
Not the PP, I'm an earlier poster, but No. That is not the sole definition of learning and education. it is however, the objective of formal education in a school environment. All the other social skills are nice by-products, but should not be the purpose of a classroom. And in my mind telling me to look on the bright side at all the social skills my kid will gain in K does not re-assure me. I send my child to school for academic instruction. It's my job as a parent to help teach and model and expose him to opportunities for social-emotional growth. |
| Yeah, my kid reviewed how to line up to a wall. For about a year. |
No, it's not. At least it's not in public schools in the US. You might think that it should be, but it isn't. |
No. The sole objective of public education, in this country and others, is to produce good citizens. Academics is a part of that, yes. But it's not the only part, or the most important part. Especially in K. |
|
...which is why the USA currently ranks less lower than 20 other nations in terms of math and general academic ability in schools.
which is why common core was set up in the first place. |
|
In our experience the games are not really games. You roll a die and write down what number you see. Cool! Then the next person rolls and writes down the number he gets. If you try to play a different "game" to make it more fun the teachers get upset.
Sometimes if the teacher is feeling really creative you get to color a triangle.
|
The US currently ranks low on standardized tests in math, etc., because they believe that the purpose of public schools is to produce educated citizens, instead of most narrowly to teach math, etc.? I wonder what the higher-ranked countries would think about the idea that the purpose of their public schools is not to produce educated citizens. |