From what a teacher has told me, in order to get an ES, the child has to demonstrate understanding and connections of a concept not yet taught to a concept they are still learning. This might be a poor example, but let's say in math, the kids are learning how to add (so, this would be a Ker). They learn 3+1 = 4. Then a child realizes that there is a relationship with those three numbers: 4 take away 1 is 3, and 4 take away 3 is 1 before they have learned this in class. The child writes this on the HW/CW without prompting. If the child makes this connection on his/her own, that would constitute an ES. However, I think to get that ES on a report card, the child would have to consistently demonstrate this kind of thinking for the entire quarter in that subject. That's why it's hard to get an ES on a report card -- it's really hard for a young child to demonstrate such leaps in thinking for the entire quarter. Some kids can do it because they are naturally smart (or maybe tutored at home). |
I'm sorry that you've had such a bad experience. I've been very happy with my children's experiences in the schools. |
Still happy that my child is LEARNING, RETAINING, KEARNING HOW TO THINK. I am not interested in the competition with other kids to get into anything. If my kids love to learn and know how to get information and think critically and analytically than he can do anything. |
| 16:59 I take it you the regular obtuse, idiotic poster. Every village needs a town idiot but really, enough is enough. |
It sounds like you are a well adjusted Curriculum 2.0 parent. |
+1. Every village needs one. |
I'm not 16:59. I am wondering which parts of 16:59's statements you disagree with. Are you 1. Not happy that your child is learning, retaining, learning how to think? (If so, why? Do you want your child to not learn and not learn how to think, or do you think that your child is not learning?) 2. Very interested in the competition with other kids to get into something? (If so, why?) 3. Disbelieving of the idea that if a kid loves to learn and knows how to get information and think critically and analytically, then they can do anything? (If so, why? Do love of learning, etc., reduce a child's ability to do things? Or are love of learning, etc., insufficient for being able to do anything?) I know that responding to these questions with answers is more difficult than responding with insults, but nonetheless I am hoping for answers instead of more insults. |
What exactly is your point? If your kid was getting traditional A/B/C grades, would that somehow make him think critically and analytically? |
I'm not 17:29 but let me give it a shot: Q: Do you want your child to not learn and not learn how to think, or do you think that your child is not learning? A: Why does my child deserve to learn when there are so many less fortunate children who may not have the same opportunities. If my child needs to stop learning so that just one of these less fortunate DC rises up than it's my duty to limit my child's learning. Q: Why are you interested in the competition with other kids to get into something? A: Because in competition 2.0, every kid is a winner! Q: Why don't you believe that kids love to learn and that if they think critically and analytically, then they can do anything? A: Because I would rather focus on world peace, do you not believe in world peace? If not, why? Thanks for the quiz. I guess every town also needs a spokesmodel.... to ask the hard questions! |
| The HGC and MS magnets are well aware of the inconsistent use of ES grades. I heard someone on the HGC committee explains they treat P and ES grades the same. |
Really? Then why did my DC get ESs in some of the areas in a category, but a P in other areas in the same category? |
The ADMISSIONS committee. (I'm not the PP, but I've heard the same thing.) |
Right, I meant the selection committee. |
Well then I give the Admissions Committee an ES! They have proven that they have a deeper understanding of the failed Curriculum 2.0 grading system! |
Disagree here. Even private school kids take standardized tests, although there isn't the kind of emphasis on how well they do like there is in public school. And unlike MoCo, our private school gives grades that are actually somewhat meaningful and highlight the specific areas where the students need more work. Of course, we have to pay for the privilege of these things, which is kind of absurd, but I can definitely see how a report card of all P's would be TOTALLY meaningless to my 4th grader and she would lose motivation to really do her best. |