Don't call her "Hillary"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's brilliant. It communicates forward progress without saying it in words. They can put any issue or message on that logo and it will work.

I think it looks like penis envy.

Seriously, you are deranged.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's brilliant. It communicates forward progress without saying it in words. They can put any issue or message on that logo and it will work.

I think it looks like penis envy.

Of course you do. You agree with President Clinton. You can't stand Hillary either.

Do you not trust President Clinton's instincts?

I just think you're a one-trick pony with an odd fixation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's brilliant. It communicates forward progress without saying it in words. They can put any issue or message on that logo and it will work.

I think it looks like penis envy.

Of course you do. You agree with President Clinton. You can't stand Hillary either.

Do you not trust President Clinton's instincts?

I just think you're a one-trick pony with an odd fixation.

You brought it up. I think you secretly agree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's brilliant. It communicates forward progress without saying it in words. They can put any issue or message on that logo and it will work.

I think it looks like penis envy.

Of course you do. You agree with President Clinton. You can't stand Hillary either.

Do you not trust President Clinton's instincts?

I just think you're a one-trick pony with an odd fixation.

You brought it up. I think you secretly agree.

I brought it up to let you know I recognize you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's a very accomplished and hardworking, dedicated, intelligent person. She has a lot of great qualities, and I think she would be a very competent President.

But she won't be elected, because she's simply not a good candidate. She never has been. She's aloof and shrill and grating and not very personable. Very few of us would do any better, to be sure, because very few people are natural political candidates. But that's what it takes to be President, and she is completely lacking in that regard. The Democrats are throwing this one.

I'd love to see a man referred to this way. I'm sure we'll hear "shrill" a lot more in the future -- it's such a gendered insult.

She's not the natural extrovert that Bill or Obama are, but that doesn't mean she wouldn't be a fine leader. If the country can elect GWB, who was a bumbling fool, we can elect a smart lady who isn't a natural politician.

Testosterone and puberty help to ensure shrill applies to women, rather than men. I hardly think it's a vast male conspiracy to insult women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's a very accomplished and hardworking, dedicated, intelligent person. She has a lot of great qualities, and I think she would be a very competent President.

But she won't be elected, because she's simply not a good candidate. She never has been. She's aloof and shrill and grating and not very personable. Very few of us would do any better, to be sure, because very few people are natural political candidates. But that's what it takes to be President, and she is completely lacking in that regard. The Democrats are throwing this one.

I'd love to see a man referred to this way. I'm sure we'll hear "shrill" a lot more in the future -- it's such a gendered insult.

She's not the natural extrovert that Bill or Obama are, but that doesn't mean she wouldn't be a fine leader. If the country can elect GWB, who was a bumbling fool, we can elect a smart lady who isn't a natural politician.

Testosterone and puberty help to ensure shrill applies to women, rather than men. I hardly think it's a vast male conspiracy to insult women.

So you really deny that it's a gendered insult, meant to draw attention to an undesirable quality that is only an attribute of females?

http://time.com/22004/how-to-not-sound-like-a-sexist-jerk-even-if-youre-a-woman/

I have a feeling we're going to hear a lot more insults that have nothing to do with her ability and everything to do with her femaleness.

[Anonymous]

I'm lost. What's wrong with calling someone by her name?

I share the sentiment that the election circus is tiresome.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's brilliant. It communicates forward progress without saying it in words. They can put any issue or message on that logo and it will work.

I think it looks like penis envy.

I don't know about "envy" but try to depict that appendage in a text. It's very similar to HRC's logo. And I know this because I teach middle schoolers who do this regularly on their phones. Go ahead, try.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's brilliant. It communicates forward progress without saying it in words. They can put any issue or message on that logo and it will work.

I think it looks like penis envy.

I don't know about "envy" but try to depict that appendage in a text. It's very similar to HRC's logo. And I know this because I teach middle schoolers who do this regularly on their phones. Go ahead, try.

By your standard, powerpoint is chock full of penises.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's a very accomplished and hardworking, dedicated, intelligent person. She has a lot of great qualities, and I think she would be a very competent President.

But she won't be elected, because she's simply not a good candidate. She never has been. She's aloof and shrill and grating and not very personable. Very few of us would do any better, to be sure, because very few people are natural political candidates. But that's what it takes to be President, and she is completely lacking in that regard. The Democrats are throwing this one.

I'd love to see a man referred to this way. I'm sure we'll hear "shrill" a lot more in the future -- it's such a gendered insult.

She's not the natural extrovert that Bill or Obama are, but that doesn't mean she wouldn't be a fine leader. If the country can elect GWB, who was a bumbling fool, we can elect a smart lady who isn't a natural politician.

Testosterone and puberty help to ensure shrill applies to women, rather than men. I hardly think it's a vast male conspiracy to insult women.

By your logic, the above statement means the biological characteristic of a woman makes her unelectable. That is the very definition of sexism.

[Anonymous]

If an arrow is a penis, then what the hell is this and why has no one brought it up in several decades:

[Anonymous]

If Hillary were an actress , she would be typecast as the grating ex-wife. Hardly any women are as alienating or repellent as Hillary. It's just the way it is. And yes... The logo looks like and probably was inspired by penis envy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If an arrow is a penis, then what the hell is this and why has no one brought it up in several decades:

People love elephants ? I know I do!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If Hillary were an actress , she would be typecast as the grating ex-wife. Hardly any women are as alienating or repellent as Hillary. It's just the way it is. And yes... The logo looks like and probably was inspired by penis envy.

2008 is calling. . . . It wants it's Chris Matthews sexist lines back.

Check with the logo design firm if you want to know what it means.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's a very accomplished and hardworking, dedicated, intelligent person. She has a lot of great qualities, and I think she would be a very competent President.

But she won't be elected, because she's simply not a good candidate. She never has been. She's aloof and shrill and grating and not very personable. Very few of us would do any better, to be sure, because very few people are natural political candidates. But that's what it takes to be President, and she is completely lacking in that regard. The Democrats are throwing this one.

I'd love to see a man referred to this way. I'm sure we'll hear "shrill" a lot more in the future -- it's such a gendered insult.

She's not the natural extrovert that Bill or Obama are, but that doesn't mean she wouldn't be a fine leader. If the country can elect GWB, who was a bumbling fool, we can elect a smart lady who isn't a natural politician.

Testosterone and puberty help to ensure shrill applies to women, rather than men. I hardly think it's a vast male conspiracy to insult women.

By your logic, the above statement means the biological characteristic of a woman makes her unelectable. That is the very definition of sexism.

The PP has been watching too much Bill O'Reilly. Haven't you heard? He said it's open season on men and Christians in the U.S., so Hillary has a great advantage. And Fox's Chris Payne said her video doesn't have enough straight white men and that the people in it are a "bucket of losers." You know -- the mom moving so her daughter can go to a better school, the black couple expecting a baby, the gay couples, the white woman who's going back to work after 5 years as a SAHM -- they're a "bucket of losers."

http://mediamatters.org/video/2015/04/14/foxs-charles-payne-attacks-hillary-clintons-201/203286