And the ability to join later after 3rd grade appears to challenging - so yes, it's tracking at least until 8th grade (and maybe beyond w/ advanced math in HS) |
| I manage former gifted program staff of all ages... |
| I've heard kids who didn't qualify talking to each other about whether of not their families were going to appeal to get them into AAP. That's crazy and sad. |
Agree. Pathetic. |
| My DC was in AAP. It was clear and apparent to the kids very early on who made it into the program on their own merits, and who made it in from appeal etc etc. For those that made it in without lots of "extra" help, they cruised through the program just fine because let's face it, the AAP has been watered down targeting the top 33% instead of the top 5 - 10% of the students. But for those that the parents appealed and pushed to get them in, they struggled! |
Actually, very different from making the travel team. In sports, it is obvious which kids are the best athletes. It is always clear which kids belong on the elite teams and you really can't fake that. Kids either have the talent or they don't. No amount of hard work or prepping is going to fool anyone into thinking that a non-athletic kid belongs on the travel team. |
Ridiculous. My kid has 29 kids in her third grade AAP class. We have no idea who made it in by which measures, who is struggling and who is cruising through. myob. |
Oh, please. |
Nonsense. Hard work and practice goes very far in sports (and life). Sure, a non-athletic kid won't make the team, but average talent and above average drive certainly will. |
Actually, it is a very good analogy. A gifted athlete can breeze through the low-level competition without work. But, once they get to a certain level there will be a wake up call. Similarly, some kids can breeze through AAP, HS (AP), etc, but fall on their face in college. A hard working average to above average student/athlete will do better than a lazy but gifted athlete. But if the coasting gifted kid gets a fire under them, look out. |
Precisely. Oh, please, be aware of the needs of the students. |
Article: 20 reasons it's horrible to grow up 'gifted' Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/why-its-horrible-to-grow-up-gifted-2015-3#ixzz3VOi2Vbna http://www.businessinsider.com/why-its-horrible-to-grow-up-gifted-2015-3 |
|
I was a gifted student and did just fine among the masses for grades 1-5 (I skipped over k). In middle school, I was grouped into an honors class of sorts-can't remember if that was what they called it, but it was the brighter kids taking classes together. It wasn't until HS when I was truly with "people like me", and that wasn't in a public school.
But, seriously, I did fine - I excelled in any environment. My needs were met just fine for many years in a non-tracked environment. |
Actually, you misread the whole post. The original analogy compared the pressure of getting into AAP to making a travel sports team. It's a poor comparison. In both cases, the naturally gifted ones are typically less stressed because they're not trying to prove their something they're not. The talent is obvious. It's the wannabe's and their parents who tend to be more stressed. I agree though that at a certain point the handwork comes in and can take even a little talent further, than a gifted person who doesn't work. |
Yep. The kids who actually need "special education" at the upper end of the spectrum are few and far between. |