Churchill road vs haycocks

[Anonymous]

This whole thread is a perfect example of how divisive AAP is and how many problems it has created. Unbelievable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The question is irrelevant. There is no home that offers a choice between Churchill and Haycock.

Some students have two primary residences. Some students have child care or a working parent closer to another school than their base school.

The fact that the OP did not state such a situation makes me wonder if one of the two schools should be watching their enrollment paperwork very carefully.

Some parents are so paranoid.

It's clear that a family is slated to a certain center if their child does not have a LLIV program at the base school. Given that, if another nearby school offers LLIV, then that family can have their child attend that school as along as they have a valid reason (child care/working parent) but the family would have to transport the child to that school since bus service would not be offered.

People here need to take a chill pill and stop assuming the worst of others.

Actually, the OP's silent on the "valid" reason makes some to assume the worst. Those two schools both are AAP centers, and no overlapping at all to warrant a child with options to pick/choose. If someone telling you that their DC can go FCPS or APS legally by their choice, what will you think?

That they can choose between FCPS and APS? House that straddles the border? Shared custody arrangement?

Not my issue. What exactly are yours?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Not my issue. What exactly are yours?

If not your issue, why you are the one jumping up and down try to defend OP?
As a good citizen, any suspicious/illegal activities are my issues. We teach our kids "see something, say something", but can't even ask for a simple "valid reason" here?

[Anonymous]

I am not OP, but I have a neighbor who can legitimately qualify for either school. It isn't my business to explain it here, so I won't. Just back off. You don't know everything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am not OP, but I have a neighbor who can legitimately qualify for either school. It isn't my business to explain it here, so I won't. Just back off. You don't know everything.

Understand. You are OP's neighbor, obligated to help out.

[Anonymous]

Those who have nothing to hide, hide nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The question is irrelevant. There is no home that offers a choice between Churchill and Haycock.

Some students have two primary residences. Some students have child care or a working parent closer to another school than their base school.

The fact that the OP did not state such a situation makes me wonder if one of the two schools should be watching their enrollment paperwork very carefully.

Some parents are so paranoid.

It's clear that a family is slated to a certain center if their child does not have a LLIV program at the base school. Given that, if another nearby school offers LLIV, then that family can have their child attend that school as along as they have a valid reason (child care/working parent) but the family would have to transport the child to that school since bus service would not be offered.

People here need to take a chill pill and stop assuming the worst of others.

Actually, the OP's silent on the "valid" reason makes some to assume the worst. Those two schools both are AAP centers, and no overlapping at all to warrant a child with options to pick/choose. If someone telling you that their DC can go FCPS or APS legally by their choice, what will you think?

If you don't have any input to the OP's question, save it and stop wasting your time wondering, worrying, and suspecting the worst out of other families.

[Anonymous]

How has this threads gotten to four pages without anyone commenting that Haycock does not have an "s?"

. Someone had to do it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How has this threads gotten to four pages without anyone commenting that Haycock does not have an "s?"

. Someone had to do it.

Perhaps because Haycocks sounds like Hogwarts and conjures up images of a magical place?

That, and the fact that it is easy enough to simply note the proper spelling in a response without being a scold. This is also common here when posters misspell Loudoun as "Loudon," for example.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Not my issue. What exactly are yours?

If not your issue, why you are the one jumping up and down try to defend OP?
As a good citizen, any suspicious/illegal activities are my issues. We teach our kids "see something, say something", but can't even ask for a simple "valid reason" here?

NP here. If there were no valid reasons for having a choice, maybe I would wonder whether what OP is doing is legal. There are are, however, multiple valid reasons that I can think of and so I don't see the need to pry into OP's personal life.

[Anonymous]

There may be a divided-household situation, but Haycock is so overcrowded that they would refuse a transfer for any reason other than potentially a Haycock employee.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There may be a divided-household situation, but Haycock is so overcrowded that they would refuse a transfer for any reason other than potentially a Haycock employee.

You don't know the circumstances, so stop making general assertions that may be incorrect in OP's case.

[Anonymous]

Just general observation, that the Haycock/Lemon Rd fight was so bitter so any attempts to get their kids into school/center they don't belong going to bring out emotions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just general observation, that the Haycock/Lemon Rd fight was so bitter so any attempts to get their kids into school/center they don't belong going to bring out emotions.

Or leads some to suggest there are obstacles to attending a center that may not, in fact, exist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There may be a divided-household situation, but Haycock is so overcrowded that they would refuse a transfer for any reason other than potentially a Haycock employee.

You don't know the circumstances, so stop making general assertions that may be incorrect in OP's case.

I'm starting to think that you're OP. You've been defending OP every step of the way...asking why people care and saying they should mind their own business. Why do you care? Why can't you seem to mind your own business?