Chancellor's Brown v Board message to parents

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:OOB spots send kids to schools their parents choose. Your approach would target kids who 'fit' the social group and demographics of the accepting school, and is really offensive as well as exclusionary. You aren't the parent, how are you qualified to judge if the outcome is 'wrong' for the child?
your distress over the 'plight' of the child comes across like crocodile tears

I've made efforts to ensure that my kids are socially comfortable in their schools, but if I had to make the choice between close to home/poor scores and far from home/decent scores, I know the option I'd pick


False. Ob spots send kids to school based on parents' assessment of chances of being accepted at that school, mixed to school preferences.
so if a parent picked Stoddart or Hearst, the computer puts Brent or Eaton in the mix? It may not be a great choice and the odds may be unfavorable but it IS the parents' choice
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Agreed. Kaya needs to do her job, which is to improve all schools, not to blame some parents for her own failings.


She needs to go! They should hire Ms. Kim as chancellor, former principal at Deal.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Much of what Kaya, DME, etc. are doing and communicating is very irresponsible. They're stirring the race pot to support their personal social goals. This is damaging not only to the school debate, but the city as a whole. We DO NOT need more race baiting in a city that arguably has some of the worst race issues in the country. The school "segregation" that has been referenced so much that it's actually accepted as a reality is not even representative of reality. Look at the stats for Murch:

STUDENT DEMOGRAPHICS
(2013-14)

Enrollment: 626
Black: 12%
Hispanic/Latino: 8%
White: 66%
Asian: 9%
Pacific/Hawaiian: 0%
Native/Alaskan: 0%
Multiple races: 5%

I would hardly say this is a white, segregated school. But why bother with the facts when spewing fiction with the knowledge that it will create a perception more powerful than facts is so much more effective at achieving political and social goals? What's going on here is so BS and so far from logical analysis and informed decision making that it would be funny if it weren't so serious. None of us could get away with any of this in our jobs (you know, coming up with recommendations based on no research and with no goal of increased success). Only in DC...


So true. My sister moved to Washington from a very multi-cultural area of LA. She could not get over the level of racial animus and resentment that she found in DC.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
On Friday, I had the honor of commemorating the 60th anniversary of the Brown vs. Board of Education decision at the White House, with President Barack Obama and the families involved in the five lawsuits responsible for the decision. It was an opportunity to witness history from a front row seat, as the President spoke about “standing on the shoulders of giants,” and the fact that he wouldn’t be where he was today was it not for Brown. The thing that struck me most, though, was not the eloquent words from the President, or Governor Deval Patrick of Massachusetts (who gets kudos in my book for the best impromptu speech EVER), or Secretary Arne Duncan. I was most impacted by a little old man who I sat next to at the reception before the program started.
He and his wife were in front of me in the line going into the White House. He kept stopping to take pictures of her in front of various parts of the building holding up the line. Instead of being frustrated, like I usually am, I thought it was charming. In fact, I volunteered to take a few pictures of the two of them so their friends wouldn’t think she was at the event by herself! They sat next to me at the reception after the wife, a teacher in Prince Georges County, recognized me as the Chancellor of DCPS. She introduced her husband, Mr. Emmanuel, as one of the original defendants in the South Carolina lawsuit (in addition to Topeka, KS, suits were brought by the NAACP Legal Defense Fund in DE, SC, VA and DC).
Mr. Emmanuel, a slight, African-American man well into his seventies was as quiet as his wife was chatty, until he got the chance to tell his story. He shared with me (after his wife started bungling the details) that he was 8 years old in 1951 when he and his family signed a petition to desegregate the public schools in his community, which was the first step in filing the suit. His family rented a farm from white landowners, who, when they heard his family was involved in “these shenanigans,” paid a visit to Mr. Emmanuel’s family. The white landowner told Mr. Emmanuel’s mother, “Lucretia, I heard that you’re planning on signing this petition. I just need to let you know that if you do, I’m going to have to put you off my place.” Mr. Emmanuel’s mother replied, “Well, I guess you’re going to have to put me off the place, because I’m signing the petition!” That night, she, her 8-year-old son, and others in their family signed the petition. The next morning, the landowners came and removed all of their things and dropped them off at the property boundary. Their family members and friends collected them and their things and they were able to re-establish themselves after some African-American landowners in town rented their land to the family.
Now, more than 60 years later, he stood in the White House, proud of the role that his family had played in changing the history of our country.
My encounter with Mr. Emmanuel sent my emotions swirling. I was proud of him and his family for being willing to sacrifice the little they had to do what they believed was right. I was reminded that regular, everyday people are the ones who can and will change the world. But most of all, I felt incredibly guilty that 60 years later, we haven’t lived up to the promise of Brown, that we haven’t honored the sacrifices made by Mr. Emmanuel, his family, and the many others who paved the way for a better educational system for ALL students, regardless of the color of their skin, or where they live. Each and every day, we work urgently, and tirelessly to provide the students of Washington, DC with a world-class education. Yet, many of children remain segregated in high-poverty, struggling schools. While some of our schools are racially and socio-economically diverse, most are not. In fact, some are becoming even more homogenous. Many of our families desire the benefits of an integrated environment, and traverse the city, play the lottery, and do anything they can to get there, while others are trapped by lack of access and opportunity.
There are no easy answers to this issue. But I am reminded that regular, everyday people like us, and those who we serve, have to work together to figure out a different way to solve this problem that has continued to vex our country, 60 years after the courts took a courageous moral stand. We owe it to Mr. Emmanuel and his family to create a very different future for the children we serve. I hope the 60th anniversary of Brown provides each of you with the opportunity to recommit to the world-changing work that we do every day.
Sincerely,
Kaya Henderson
Chancellor

Not a link, clearly. But here it is!


So what is Ms, Henderson doing about "struggling schools", other than proposing to scatter their population elsewhere? I dread Muriel Bowser becoming mayor with Henderson continuing as chancellor. They would make quite the "dynamic duo."
Anonymous
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Much of what Kaya, DME, etc. are doing and communicating is very irresponsible. They're stirring the race pot to support their personal social goals. This is damaging not only to the school debate, but the city as a whole. We DO NOT need more race baiting in a city that arguably has some of the worst race issues in the country. The school "segregation" that has been referenced so much that it's actually accepted as a reality is not even representative of reality. Look at the stats for Murch:

STUDENT DEMOGRAPHICS
(2013-14)

Enrollment: 626
Black: 12%
Hispanic/Latino: 8%
White: 66%
Asian: 9%
Pacific/Hawaiian: 0%
Native/Alaskan: 0%
Multiple races: 5%

I would hardly say this is a white, segregated school. But why bother with the facts when spewing fiction with the knowledge that it will create a perception more powerful than facts is so much more effective at achieving political and social goals? What's going on here is so BS and so far from logical analysis and informed decision making that it would be funny if it weren't so serious. None of us could get away with any of this in our jobs (you know, coming up with recommendations based on no research and with no goal of increased success). Only in DC...


Interesting that Murch is 66% white and also 66% inbounds. I suspect those percentages will grow roughly in tandem over the next few years.


This has been posted in other places before: the 66% in bound is a persistent typo that DCPS hasn't fixed (a Freudian typo perhaps, given the match). Murch has 14% OOB, so 86% inbound. These students are spread fairly evenly throughout the grades, with the largest number in 5th. It will change next year with a large class of OOB students graduating, while enrollment increases to approx. 680; but I'll predict 11% OOB next year (unless the boundaries are redrawn, then who knows!)

And to add to the mix measures of diversity that these stats fail to show: within each of these populations, including the "white" population, you will find students from all over the world, and all over the SES spectrum, with all kinds of family units. So there is diversity within the diversity.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The perspective of Chancellor Henderson, like most everyone at DCPS, ignores the reality that one of the biggest reasons (if not the primary reason for most DC neighborhoods) that parents desire to traverse the city to get an education for their kids is because the most motivated parents in their respective neighborhoods are already traversing the city to get an education for their kids.

The situation today is very much different than in the days of Brown. "Segregation" today means something completely different than it did then.

I strongly believe that if DCPS instituted policies that encouraged development of strong neighborhood schools, then many (though not all) neighborhoods in the city would soon have dramatically improved neighborhood schools.



WELL SAID!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Agreed. Kaya needs to do her job, which is to improve all schools, not to blame some parents for her own failings.


She needs to go! They should hire Ms. Kim as chancellor, former principal at Deal.



Doesn't she work for DCI now?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Agreed. Kaya needs to do her job, which is to improve all schools, not to blame some parents for her own failings.


She needs to go! They should hire Ms. Kim as chancellor, former principal at Deal.



Doesn't she work for DCI now?



(Melissa Kim)
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Agreed. Kaya needs to do her job, which is to improve all schools, not to blame some parents for her own failings.


She needs to go! They should hire Ms. Kim as chancellor, former principal at Deal.



Doesn't she work for DCI now?



(Melissa Kim)


No, she is with the New Schools Venture Fund. She is on the DCI Board.
post reply Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Message Quick Reply
Go to: