43% of home purchases are all cash

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kim was an example, you ignoramus. If I told you where our degrees were from, it would shut your big mouth up very quick.

Then again, I doubt you know when to shut it.

I hope I don't employ you, if I do, its not for long.

Our degrees? Did it take a group effort?

What is this poster saying? They don't understand basic reading? I'm part Asian and I understood this.

Anyway, we are considered white for census reasons (it could go either way), and we paid cash OP. I thought most people paid cash for their homes?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is your bitching about the high cost of kids any different from my bitching about the high cost of travel to Bali this year?

You make your choices. Live with them.

Wow, I didn't know Bali was going to pay for your social security!

I don't expect to get social security, in part because I plan to retire to Bali. But thanks for caring.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kim was an example, you ignoramus. If I told you where our degrees were from, it would shut your big mouth up very quick.

Then again, I doubt you know when to shut it.

I hope I don't employ you, if I do, its not for long.

Uh huh, so you are going to fire asians? Maybe just the kims.

huh?

Huh? Why would Asians be fired? Can you not do your job, as it requires social skills and not rote memorization?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This surprised me.

http://money.cnn.com/2014/05/08/real_estate/cash-home-sales/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

It makes sense to me that there is a significant %, 43% seems a bit high, but still within the ballpark. My parents bought one house with a loan, lived in it for 30+ years and paid it off, the sold it and bought their second house (moved south for retirement) with the proceeds of the sale of their first house. Their community is filled with couples who did the same thing.

DH and I will have two houses purchased with loans before we fully pay off the second and buy the retirement house with the proceeds. My sister and BIL will have one. DH's sister and brother each will have purchased one with loans and will soon by their retirement house with the proceeds.

[Anonymous]

Did anyone bother to read the article long enough to get to the part that the average cash buyer is paying slightly more than $200,000 for a home. That's about the same as putting 20 percent down on a $1 million home, not very different from what most people here do.

[Anonymous]

Don't understand why people are bragging about paying off their homes. That is one of the least advantageous ways to invest your money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only first time homebuyers put down just 20%!

On our second home we put down 60%. It's easy. Live your life on one income and save the other's income.

Do you live in the DC metro? Or are you married to a law partner? or you are are old. B/c with daycare running $3k/month for two kids, mortgage for a basic starter home at $3k/month, you have to clear $200k to 'save the other's income'.

No. We make HHI 180k. We aren't Asian (although I do agree they are good savers). We don't have children yet, but considering our mortgage is only $1500 on our 700k house, it won't be such a struggle with daycare. We lived on one income since we got jobs and saved 60k a year. We still take great overseas vacations and don't feel pinched at all.

Wait until you have kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only first time homebuyers put down just 20%!

On our second home we put down 60%. It's easy. Live your life on one income and save the other's income.

Do you live in the DC metro? Or are you married to a law partner? or you are are old. B/c with daycare running $3k/month for two kids, mortgage for a basic starter home at $3k/month, you have to clear $200k to 'save the other's income'.

No. We make HHI 180k. We aren't Asian (although I do agree they are good savers). We don't have children yet, but considering our mortgage is only $1500 on our 700k house, it won't be such a struggle with daycare. We lived on one income since we got jobs and saved 60k a year. We still take great overseas vacations and don't feel pinched at all.

Come back when you have kids. You are really fortunate and I say congratulations, but you come across as smug. Not everyone makes as much as you nor have they been as fortunate.

Not smug one bit. Not even that proud about it. But I'm sick of everyone saying they can't do it. We haven't always made this much either.

Than how did you save $60k/year for at least 7 years to get your $400k downpayment?? That requires about $100k additional pre-tax salary, so where did savings come from? Any outside help or lucky investments (ie you bought before the last bubble?)

It was our second home... We did make money on the sale of 1st home, but we also put a lot of equity into it. We had a high mortgage.

You're speaking so far out of your ass at this point that you should really refrain from giving household savings tips to others. I say this as someone who shares your sentiment: too many people say it's too hard, too much of the time. That said, you've materially misrepresented your situation and left off -- and, here, as elsewhere I'll constrain myself to speaking from experience -- one major component of savings/consumption: children.

I'll break it down for you. In DC, daycare will run about 2k per month for the first 3 years (that's an average). It will decline by a few hundred dollars in subsequent years. **(See below.)

Once your child reaches school-age, you'll quickly realized that school hours are short, much shorter than working hours. So you'll need some care around the ends of the day. And in the summer. You'll either be looking at an au pair or some other arrangement costing about the same.

Next, with your income, you'll likely be hit by the AMT. That hurts. Factor in about 5k in additional taxes.

Finally, the child will really squeeze your day. Effectively, career-advancement is on-hold for a few years. This is the trade-off you should be cognizant of going-in, and acknowledge that you're fortunate enough to be in such a position. But, this does limit your income gains for at least a few years.

Oh, and start saving for college. But, honestly, on 180k, this will be tough. You're in the exact wrong spot for college: high enough income to not qualify for financial aid, but not high enough that you can comfortably swing the cost out-of-pocket. Yeah, this will suck, so start planning ahead now.

Signed,
Parent of 2, HHI @300k, mortgage around 900k.

**Yes, you can find cheaper daycare options. But, extrapolating from your HHI, you'll probably find the cheaper options not to your liking. A family daycare may be fine for most people (and I personally believe it is in no ways inferior), but you'll probably elect to go a more corporate route. Probably located nearer to your employment.

I do realize what you're saying. We waited until we had a home we wanted to raise children in before having children. Our mortgage is very low ($1500) so that we can afford children, saving for college, daycare or even if one parent wants to stay home. We love that low mortgage. I'm not speaking out of my ass... I'm not trying to give household tips to others. I would never, but I don't think it's fair to say that only Asians can save or that it's not doable in this area. Yes, it's harder.

No, you don't realize what I'm saying. The picture you should be getting here is that you *don't* know.

I used to be the same way, before I had kids. They really are blood-sucking financial leeches.

Each child will cost around 2 times your current mortgage payment, not including saving for college. Your fabulous vacations just got 25% more expensive. (You have to buy a full-price seat after age 2; the hotel room will stay the same.)

+1, and I hope you have cash saved for IVF.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Don't understand why people are bragging about paying off their homes. That is one of the least advantageous ways to invest your money.

Having a paid for house with enough land to feed ones family is a lesson learned by my family during the 1930's. YMMV. Not every decision should be based on maximizing ones investment potential.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't understand why people are bragging about paying off their homes. That is one of the least advantageous ways to invest your money.

Having a paid for house with enough land to feed ones family is a lesson learned by my family during the 1930's. YMMV. Not every decision should be based on maximizing ones investment potential.

There's investment potential and diversification. If all or most of your savings is in your house, you are very vulnerable to the next real estate crash.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't understand why people are bragging about paying off their homes. That is one of the least advantageous ways to invest your money.

Having a paid for house with enough land to feed ones family is a lesson learned by my family during the 1930's. YMMV. Not every decision should be based on maximizing ones investment potential.

There's investment potential and diversification. If all or most of your savings is in your house, you are very vulnerable to the next real estate crash.

Has anyone indicated that all their savings were in their house? You can have a house that is fully and AND have other savings that make it diversified.

FWIW, I bought my current house for $275K, it is knocking on $1M now, if the real estate market crashed to the point where I lose money- there will more to worry about than my RTI.

[Anonymous]

Not everyone who pays cash for their house uses all of their cash.

Most of my friends have $2m+ houses. They didn't not buy them at any cut rate discount, they are gorgeous new homes. They did not buy those homes, and become successful, by being stupid. Of course their money is diversified! Who on earth puts all their money into their house? They should be buying $10m houses because they have the cash? That is not how it works; nor do they try to claim to be the "millionaire next door" in an old house.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Having a paid for house with enough land to feed ones family is a lesson learned by my family during the 1930's. YMMV. Not every decision should be based on maximizing ones investment potential.

+1.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't understand why people are bragging about paying off their homes. That is one of the least advantageous ways to invest your money.

Having a paid for house with enough land to feed ones family is a lesson learned by my family during the 1930's. YMMV. Not every decision should be based on maximizing ones investment potential.

There's investment potential and diversification. If all or most of your savings is in your house, you are very vulnerable to the next real estate crash.

Or you live in a house that is underwater.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Not everyone who pays cash for their house uses all of their cash.

Most of my friends have $2m+ houses. They didn't not buy them at any cut rate discount, they are gorgeous new homes. They did not buy those homes, and become successful, by being stupid. Of course their money is diversified! Who on earth puts all their money into their house? They should be buying $10m houses because they have the cash? That is not how it works; nor do they try to claim to be the "millionaire next door" in an old house.

Why are you so angry? I don't know your neighbors nor was I speaking about them. And yes, for many people, their house is their primary investment, especially for those who are middle class and aggressively pay down their mortgage.