Please...you're taking yourself too seriously. Stop taking deep breaths. |
Yes, it's odd. It's akin to frequenting trying to conceive, wedding planning or similar type forums. The rose has bloomed and died on those chapters of your life. Move on. |
Seriously! And a lot of us have BTDT with older children and still have younger ones in elementary. So this discussion is very relevant to us, especially as we're the ones who can vouch for how things turn out in high school. So many of these parents of only younger children have no idea just how unimportant AAP is in the whole scheme of things. Once high school rolls around, it makes no difference who was in it and who wasn't. It's pretty sad how much anxiety this program causes. |
I agree. What happens to children is really irrelevant overall. Once your parent or parents have died, you realize that your kids will truly be just fine no matter if they are doctors or plumbers or bankers. Overall, where they went to school just doesn't matter. |
Poor analogy, not akin to that at all as a mismanaged school system can cause a heckuva lot more harm than someone's tacky wedding. Again, try to see past the nose on your own face -- COMMUNITY. How we educate children affects us all. If people don't want to hear from folks who have BTDT, why come to this board asking questions? |
| So much depends on your child and how well they know you at school. If you are a recent arrival, with no PTA, haven't been there since K, you are in the pool to be "overlooked" When you see the c***p they turn in to represent your kid, you will be glad of the appeals process. It merely corrects mistakes -- and there are many, many who get in who don't meet the standard, and many who don't get in who should. It is a very large group of children overall, so there is room for many mistakes. There are just not that many kids with WISC score of +130. That is a myth --most have WISC 120+ |
THIS. |
Please explain how you came to that calculation. Of the in-pool kids who were accepted, how many even had a WISC done? My guess is very few. Mine certainly didn't--no reason to pay for a WISC if potentially it wasn't needed. I am also the poster who parent-referred with a WISC of 129, and my DC did not get in. I didn't see DC's GBRS, but since DC has always gotten good marks for both academics and behavior, I doubt it was a huge factor. My thought is the scores--WISC and CoGAT/NNAT--were just too low. |
| Seems that sometimes Wisc on appeal can be lower than if submitted first round. How low were the NNAT/COGAT? |
Ok - you have the freedom to express your opinion but why voice to folks that DON"T REALLY CARE? We are not discussing anything around funding or money that isn't already in place- but HEY - write your flipping Congressman or show up at every school board meeting - you seem to have a lot of time on your hands. More importantly stop wasting our time filtering out your nonsense in a forum that clearly you don't support or contribute meaningfully. |
+10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 |
Um, it seems you are the one who has just a little too much time on your hands. See below. You seem inordinately angry that others would feel much differently about AAP than you. It's kind of entertaining to see you actually try and order people to "stop wasting your time". I could turn that around and tell you to stop wasting our time with your ridiculous angst over something as trivial as AAP. Oh, and remember: DEEP BREATH!
|