Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can someone please explain to me how the new SWW@FS is in any way substantively different from the old SWW? I understand that the name is different, and the Principal and some of the teachers are different. But by "substance," I mean: what is the long-term plan for the future (I can't find any firm information on this, anywhere)? Is there a plan to increase in-boundary attendance or change the feeder system? What is the relationship with "Walls," really, other than the name change (believe me, I've looked, and I've seen no firm plan in this regard)?
Disclosure: my child attended F-S Campus a few years ago, and the rumors about one or two violent kids not being removed from the school are accurate. Many (I mean, a lot) of the cars at drop-off were from Maryland. Test scores were bad. I would like to learn more about whether there is any basis to be optimistic that things will change.
I am interested in whether or not there is actually a difference, but for a different reason than the previous posters. My DC graduated from Francis-Stevens and was accepted into Banneker and I have to say that I was pleased with the education she received there. I travel a lot and felt comfortable with her there instead of our neighborhood school option. She was challenged and supported while she was there and she grew tremendously as a person and student. My question is are they changing the school for the previous population/demographic of children (Low income minorities) or are they changing the people and demographics of the students in the school? Let's be real about this, the more non-poor (regardless of race) and non-black and brown students there are in ANY school the better their scores are. Was this decision made to serve the current population (which was alienated during the transition) or to recruit the neighborhood white families and upper-middle class blacks that roam this forum.