What's ironic about this, exactly? Do you know that the founding documents exist in printed form? Here's the Declaration of Independence, for example, as printed by July 6, 1776: http://myloc.gov/Exhibitions/creatingtheus/DeclarationofIndependence/BattleJoined/ExhibitObjects/FirstPrintedVersionofDeclarationofIndependence.aspx And do you know that the handwriting people used in the 18th century is not the cursive people teach (or used to teach) in schools today? Here's an online tutorial to teach you how to read the handwriting people used in the 18th century: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/palaeography/ And do you know that not being able to read historical documents is not some crazy failure of the school system that is unique to the US? In Germany, for example, people born after World War II pretty much can't read anything handwritten before World War II (see here for an example of pre-World War II handwriting: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:S%C3%BCtterlin.svg ). And in Turkey, people can't read historical documents from the Ottoman Empire, because they are in Turkish written in a version of the Arabic alphabet, and since 1929 Turkish has been written in a version of the Latin alphabet. Historical change -- it happens. |
You sound like all those news anchors who were appalled that the witness in the Martin case couldn't read cursive. That is typical of kids her age--has nothing to do with race. |
|
The act of writing with one's hand contributes to the learning process. For this reason, it is more effective to study via writing notes by hand than by keyboard.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/01/110119095458.htm http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/memory-medic/201303/what-learning-cursive-does-your-brain http://davidsortino.blogs.pressdemocrat.com/10221/brain-research-and-cursive-writing/ http://techland.time.com/2013/07/10/the-dying-art-of-handwriting/ |
Actually just 30 years ago or so it was not typical at all. Students were taught to be proficient in cursive which is great tool for learning and taking quick notes in class. it also helps students to learn how to focus. |
| What would you do if you have to capture a whole lot of written information in a very short amount of time, but don't have anything with a keyboard? The person who knows cursive would have no problem. The person doing block printing would only get half of it. Cursive is much faster than block writing. |
I would print. In fact, I do print. Printing has worked for me through high school, a bachelor's degree, two masters degrees, a doctoral degree, and secretarial work as a temp. |
Depends on whether you know how to take notes properly. If you are one of those who need to write every word, I guess it is a problem. For those who know how to pick out key pieces of information, not so much. |
| Wow! I didn't even know this was a thing. I will teach my 4 y.o. cursive myself or get a tutor. The brain thing is a bonus, I guess, if it's true, but I think it's important on its own. Some things, like memorizing poetry and learning to behave in church I consider to be part of being part of a civilized society. Cursive, too. |
I am 52yo and never learned cursive properly. I can and do, however, write in script very quickly and easily and I'm a great note-taker. So no problem here. |
My son's OT told me about the brain/hand connection. Studies support the notion that information is processed and retained better via handwriting than via keyboarding. |
It's obviously not foolproof. All the PPs discussing how learning cursive improves brain development didn't fully comprehend the question asked in the OP - is it "important to KNOW how to read/write cursive?" Answer - no, it isn't. By the time today's elementary school kids are in the workforce, or even college, cursive will be seen as an archaic affectation along the lines calligraphy, needed for wedding invitations and to decipher Grandma's old journals. Whether it is important to LEARN cursive, because of the concomitant benefits in brain development is another question entirely - one the OP didn't ask. Personally, I think reading comprehension is much more important than proficiency in cursive writing. Opinions vary, of course. |
| Yes, it is VERY important. Just another part of the dumbing down of our society. |
|
My son can't read my handwriting (which is fine). He can't even read his step-mom's handwriting (which is lovely). Bugs me. Bugs him.
I only leave him notes in cursive now. |
| what I mean by "fine" is that my handwriting is perfectly legible. |