Posters your sick of!

Anonymous
I'm sick of posters who, like OP, apparently can't use grammar properly. Not only does she not know how to use a contraction, but she also ended her post title with a preposition.

Really, posters who make mistakes like these bug me most of all.
Anonymous
The trolls who don't think they are trolls.
Anonymous
I'll play. The poster who thinks "libtard" is a clever insult. It makes her sound like a preschooler who thinks she invented a dirty word.
Anonymous
Posters who just cannot let a grammatical error go, even when 5 posters have already pointed it out.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The crazy anti-vax conspiracy theory woman.

+100
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:PS. There HAVE BEEN tons of threads....(although that's a dubious grammatical construct at best)

not "there's been". ugh.


I'm 18:04; we you correcting me? I said 'there's been a ton of threads,' and I think that's grammatically correct.


'There has been tons' is incorrect. 'There have been tons' is correct.


But i said, "there's been a ton" -- isn't that correct?
Anonymous
The "DCUMMIE" poster. Not nearly as clever as she thinks.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:PS. There HAVE BEEN tons of threads....(although that's a dubious grammatical construct at best)

not "there's been". ugh.


I'm 18:04; we you correcting me? I said 'there's been a ton of threads,' and I think that's grammatically correct.


'There has been tons' is incorrect. 'There have been tons' is correct.


But i said, "there's been a ton" -- isn't that correct?


NO, it's not, because if you "uncontract" the contraction "there's" it is "there is." And "there is been a ton" is not correct, as you, me, and everyone else can recognize.
Anonymous
s/o posters of bad/dumb topics
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:PS. There HAVE BEEN tons of threads....(although that's a dubious grammatical construct at best)

not "there's been". ugh.


I'm 18:04; we you correcting me? I said 'there's been a ton of threads,' and I think that's grammatically correct.


'There has been tons' is incorrect. 'There have been tons' is correct.


But i said, "there's been a ton" -- isn't that correct?


NO, it's not, because if you "uncontract" the contraction "there's" it is "there is." And "there is been a ton" is not correct, as you, me, and everyone else can recognize.


Isn't the contraction "there has," not "there is?" Now I am really starting to second-guess my grammatical smarts!
Anonymous
You're correct; 19:48 -- 19:45 is incorrect
Anonymous
The "it's DC Urban Moms and Dads" poster who asks every childless person who posts what they are doing reading this part of the Internet before they have procreated.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The "it's DC Urban Moms and Dads" poster who asks every childless person who posts what they are doing reading this part of the Internet before they have procreated.



Yes, especially in this forum, called "Off Topic" that pretty much has NOTHING to do with parenting.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:PS. There HAVE BEEN tons of threads....(although that's a dubious grammatical construct at best)

not "there's been". ugh.


I'm 18:04; we you correcting me? I said 'there's been a ton of threads,' and I think that's grammatically correct.


'There has been tons' is incorrect. 'There have been tons' is correct.


But i said, "there's been a ton" -- isn't that correct?


NO, it's not, because if you "uncontract" the contraction "there's" it is "there is." And "there is been a ton" is not correct, as you, me, and everyone else can recognize.


Isn't the contraction "there has," not "there is?" Now I am really starting to second-guess my grammatical smarts!


It's "there've" - contractions contract the words they replace.
Anonymous
I'm not sick of her, but is C9BL still around? I haven't seen any posts from her lately.
post reply Forum Index » Off-Topic
Message Quick Reply
Go to: