Dr. Taylor earns the better part of a half million dollars per year. The justification for that salary, for a public servant, is that he would make more than that if he took his "CEO" skills to the private sector. But here's the thing -- in the private sector a new executive is expected to assess the capacity of the leadership team they inherit and to make changes as needed. The idea that Taylor was blindsided by "saboteurs" is laughable because he willingly kept people who everyone knew were terrible. If he had engaged in genuine community dialogue with key stakeholders regarding their engagement with the Central Office, he would have absolutely cleaned house. But he didn't do that work because he's not that kind of leader, and he got what he got. |
This is spot on. |
+1 |
|
Although I absolutely believe Taylor was stupid to keep people like Essie McGuire, Donna Redmond-Jones and Peter Moran on when he took over, I'm not convinced that he's some victim of their evil genius.
Taylor is VERY much in charge and if anything, they do what he wants them to do and not the other way around. That being said, I guess you could argue their inept execution of his plans and ideas is a form of sabotage, and perhaps they do quiet backbiting amongst their underlings, but Taylor definitely seems to be the dominant force in MCPS and not the other way around. |
| This board felt similarly about Monica McKnight, Jack Smith, and Josh Starr (the superintendents over the last 15 years). Angering some people is the nature of the job. And the nature of DCUM. Overall, MCPS is moving forward, lurching though it may be, and stability in the superintends office is worth something. |
| I agree. In a county this size, you’re not going to accomplish anything if you don’t anger some people along the way. And the last thing we need is yet another superintendent. |
This was meant to be agreement with PP who listed the past superintendents. |
Taylor is way beyond any other super in angering staff and parents. |
I can't believe he elevated Niki Hazel Porter. Shows he has absolutely no judgment. |
And yet, no. Not Wootton here, buffoon. Smaller cohorts in the magnets means the curriculum as it is currently, will have insufficient numbers of students to hold all classes. The curriculum weakens and collapses and teachers leave, because they won't have jobs. So, it is a de facto cancellation of the magnets. |
Porter is a total weak link. She needs to go back to teaching elementary school. |
We have pharma, NIST, and NIH - but yeah, cancel the magnets. |
I think he will continue to weaken our academics, so you are wrong on that. We need the BOE to get it right. |
Taylor rules with an iron fist, it is clear. So your post is hilariously wide of the target. |
Heavenly relatives. |