Never? Really? Yet people actually do and for good reasons. Unless, of course, you think you are the ultimate judge of what is good in the world. |
| What is a “good reason” to spend more than four years on an undergraduate degree, double major or otherwise? |
You are the self-appointed judge. Let’s hear your view. |
I understand that you don't value education |
Maintaining the illusion is incredibly important. |
I’m not PP so please stop dodging what seems to be a fairly straightforward question. |
| NP. Why do any of you care why someone else spent more than four years to get a degree? If the person could afford it (in whatever way that means for them) and wanted or needed to, that’s their prerogative. Other people’s educational and financial choices do not affect you and do not need to have your values and judgements assigned. |
Ok so let’s try this. A kid is number one on their class with an A plus average with hardest classes at a top DMV private that offers no AP classes. Aiming for appropriately challenging colleges. Is there any reason to take all these AP tests?? Do HYPSM care with those grades? |
But it’s not, is it? Your good reason is not judgy PP’s good reason. It’s a BS question. |
This doesn't happen at Ivies or other top colleges, just state schools that want to push kids through the factory as quickly as possible. While it would be cheaper for my kids to skip part of their college experience by using AP credits I'm glad they are undergrads for four years and will graduate with the class they started with. They have decades to be in the working world and joining it by 21 won't make their lives at all better. |
That’s great for your kids. Do you think everyone is like you and your kids? Do you think everyone goes to an Ivy or whatever you judge to be top schools? Do you have any sense of a world outside your bubble? |
No I do not think everyone is like my kids, nor do I say that everyone goes to an Ivy or other top schools. Someone posted their experience and I posted mine, without saying it was the best or norm. Defensive much? |
“State schools that push kids through the factory as quickly as possible.” So much judgement there. |
Right. All the ones generally considered "best" did, and they did it collectively, because they felt threatened. The remaining privates never really held themselves out to be "better" than public schools academically--they market themselves as being "special" in other ways--so they didn't feel threatened by public school curriculum. |
I do judge schools that are trying to push kids through as quickly as possible, so much of what you learn in college is social and not based on adding up credit hours as quickly as possible. I don’t think they’re doing this in service of their students or their experience. And it’s odd to me when parents brag that their kids got to experience less time in college than the standard 4 years, what’s the rush? |