| For those that had daughters stay on B teams, do those players get as much recruiting help from the club as A team players? M&D is known to be a big recruiting powerhouse but do the red team players get the same attention as the black team players? |
Of course not |
The straight truth here is that the B team players get much less interest from college coaches than the A team players, so the club naturally needs to spend less time on the B team recruiting. |
That and maybe if you're on a B team, it's pretty rare you are at the level to play in college. |
|
If any club, including M&D says they put in as much time on their B team and they do their A team, they are lying.
I would say that M&D, Heros, and Capital seem to have best recruiting results for their B teams. |
If a kid is on any B team, "recruiting" is a laughable concept. For OP, it's not coaching that would put DD on the A team. Typically, an A player has better skills and/or athleticism. Skills you can fix with practice at home and private coaching. Athleticism is easy to judge by watching DD also play other sports. The athletes always stick out. Absent athleticism, the skills only get you so far and I wouldn't worry about it too much. |
The best player I knew, who started as freshman on top ranked D1 program, lived on the wall. Every minute of every day, in the cold of winter and on the hot summer days. Many people have similar talent, speed, game IQ, but ultimately the differentiator is work ethic. More hours = better results. She can get there. |
| There are B team players that get recruited. Just not to top programs. If you good enough to play for schools like UNC or BC, why would you be on a B team |