Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can anyone explain why there are “squatters rights”? Or for that matter why there should be tenant’s rights if tenants refuse to pay their rent? I don’t mean tenant’s rights with regards to protecting tenants from abuse, fraud, inhabitable conditions, etc.; I mean why are there rights when tenants simply refuse to pay their rent.
Maybe a similar situation that people can more easily understand - a spouse that is not an owner on the property, doesn't have a job and the other spouse files for divorce & changes the locks making that person homeless. That person has no lease and no ownership rights so is a "squatter."
Similarly, family allows another family member, even a child to live rent free but one day changes the locks. Homeless person.
It's essentially rights for someone that has housing and no contract under a number of circumstances.