Fraud needs to be eliminated but the programs don't. Eliminating the staff that was investigating fraud and firing IRS agents, by the way, has increased the inefficiency and fraud, not decreased it. |
| I think taxes on the ultra rich will.have to increase, most people are becoming poorer right now. |
| They will inflate the debt away. Politically much easier |
|
I also think laws need to be changed based on immigration. You could get citizenship but can't rely on Govt if you are already close to retiring while getting citizenship and that is your intent.
|
there are also a lot of deadbeat employees within Govt and they need to go. No point in pushing for efficiency when your employees are just waiting to retire and not do anything. I work for Govt and see what kind of wastage there is. |
Very few people move to the US and then become reliant on Medicaid. I do know of one person who did this, but it was truly because she moved here to be with her daughter and then, two decades later her health precipitously declined. If she hadn't had access to Medicaid, I'm not sure how we would have dealt with her: throw an 80 year old with Alzheimers out on the street? |
+1 I'm not sure why Republicans think it's a responsible move to attack the IRS, encourage its most experience staff to quit and cut taxes for billionaires. Revenue down, yet spending remains (for Republican priorities). Japan, China, Canada and the EU hold a lot of America's national debt. And at the rate Trump is fracturing those alliances, they could easily dump that debt and we can watch rates soar in this country, at the same time we have bad inflation. Then our goose will truly be cooked. |
| I thought the people in the money forum would be more intelligent and not spew this political nonsense. |
Is it nonsense only because you don’t know how to refute it? You should learn how to separate your opinions from facts, something that is taught in elementary school. |
Why would that be the solution when billionaires can be taxed and wouldn't even notice it? |
You can tax all the billionaires 100% and it still would not fully cover the debt. |
Its full of TDS. People with really short memories want to pretend our national debt wasn't a problem when the democrats ran the country. |
You just reinforced the point that cutting Medicare and social security will be impossible. You automatically pivoted to taxing the billionaires. |
| I think anyone with a net worth of more than $3 million should be paying higher taxes and/or an annual wealth tax. Why, because nobody NEEDS that much money to live, even in retirement. There are not enough billionaires, but plenty of upper middle class out there. |
|
The national debt is around $38 trillion and increasing at a rate faster than GDP growth. Servicing the interest on the debt is already the single biggest item in the federal budget. Obviously, none of this is sustainable. And there will likely be a major financial crisis as Trump isolates the US and the rest of the world drops the US dollar as a reserve currency.
The American political system is obviously very broken. Both parties have been captured by the billionaire class. Inflation will be the primary means used to deal with the debt. This means very high interest rates in the years ahead. Taxes will be raised, but mostly on what remains of the MC and UMC. Fees for everything are also going to skyrocket. The super-wealthy - the 0.001 percent - won't be touched until there is a proper revolution. In the meantime, they will float like vultures over the American economy and pick up assets for pennies on the dollar. The model is Russia in the 90s - an oligarchy that rules and feasts while the rest of the country collapses and sees living standards plummet. |