220,000 Fewer Workers: How Trump’s Cuts Affected Every Federal Agency

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:everyday more progress against the lunatics groveling at the trough.

3 more years to trim federal spending even more.

They aren't trimming federal spending.

How is this a hard concept.

Don the Con's eyes on the whole US Treasury he is bilking taxpayers out of every dime til he burns the country to the ground.

There will be no jobs in any sector much less the government.

The US is in dangerous territory unemployment is rising in all sectors not jus the feds. Project 2025 has clear guidlines for all employers you all might want to read them. They have not been implimented yet but they are coming.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:everyday more progress against the lunatics groveling at the trough.

3 more years to trim federal spending even more.

Then we cut subsidies to farmers who literally grovel at the trough.

And welfare states … buy FEMA good luck Texas and Florida.

[Anonymous]

The aggressive cuts, including mass layoffs and contract cancellations, were estimated by some to have created over $100 billion in potential new costs for the government due to legal challenges, inefficiency, and contractual obligations.Reduced Revenue: Some analysts predicted that DOGE's actions, particularly those targeting IRS enforcement, could lead to a decline in tax receipts of more than $500 billion over time.
Limited Impact on Overall Budget: Despite the disruptions, total federal spending continued to grow in the first months of the second Trump term, partly because major budget items like Social Security and Medicare were not targeted.

The Trump administration “wasted” $10bn on paid leave, or paying workers to stay home, as part of the “department of government efficiency's”

Doge's efforts will actually cost taxpayers $135 billion this fiscal year.

President Trump and Elon Musk's plan to halve the IRS workforce would allow ultra-rich tax cheats to effectively steal an additional $30 million every day.

And you won't have jobs. But hey that's what MAGA voted for this is what Republicans want from their congressmen and women no more economy. High unemployment in all sectors not just the government. Which leads to a great depression by Nov 2026.

Next up Don sends the $1500 checks to the little people for health care oh and don't you worry your income tax payment will be deducted from that..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These data tables are shocking. Everyone knows that USAID and Dept of Ed were slashed, but the number of agencies showing departments that are decimated from Dept of Ag, GSA, HUD and Treasury was really surprising to me. FAFO Republicans.

A lot of those were early retirements, buyouts and resignations.

Gee, I wonder why an unusual number of people retired early, took buyouts, and resigned?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:New York Times data analysis of the Trump federal worker cuts and which agencies were impacted and how...

220,000 Fewer Workers: How Trump’s Cuts Affected Every Federal Agency
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/01/09/upshot/trump-workforce-cuts-table.html
The Trump administration shrank the federal work force by about 220,000 workers through November, representing about a 10 percent cut, according to new data that offers the first clear view of the president’s blitz to remake the government’s labor force. This decline, which also accounts for limited new hiring, has reversed the last decade of growth for America’s largest employer, returning the federal work force to roughly the size it was when President Trump took office the first time.

But the cuts went far deeper for some agencies and offices: They have had the effect of hollowing out decades-old functions of the federal government.

In many cases, the departures have whittled down agencies that hadn’t grown in years or benefited from the expansion of the federal work force over the last two decades. Most of that expansion has been driven by just one agency, the Department of Veterans Affairs. In other words, Mr. Trump’s cuts — some carried out haphazardly, then reversed — aren’t a simple rollback of recent government bloat, but a more fundamental change to what the government does.

hmm, what percentage are African American women?

getting to celebrate MLK birthday today with no work hanging over their heads

[Anonymous]

I have a friend who worked at NIOSH where they're claiming to undo the cuts. The problem is they destroyed all the samples and erased data, literally decades of medical research trashed. And why would people.like her go back, with the chance they'll just smash everything up again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These data tables are shocking. Everyone knows that USAID and Dept of Ed were slashed, but the number of agencies showing departments that are decimated from Dept of Ag, GSA, HUD and Treasury was really surprising to me. FAFO Republicans.

A lot of those were early retirements, buyouts and resignations.

Gee, I wonder why an unusual number of people retired early, took buyouts, and resigned?

I know, just saying it was an idiotic plan to allow the DRP across the board.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These data tables are shocking. Everyone knows that USAID and Dept of Ed were slashed, but the number of agencies showing departments that are decimated from Dept of Ag, GSA, HUD and Treasury was really surprising to me. FAFO Republicans.

A lot of those were early retirements, buyouts and resignations.

Gee, I wonder why an unusual number of people retired early, took buyouts, and resigned?

I know, just saying it was an idiotic plan to allow the DRP across the board.

I took DRP and it worked out nicely for me and many others but my program didn’t.