Focus group - 20 Gen Z republicans

Anonymous
It may not help us win elections, but it's psychologically easier to write off Gen Z as dumd and racist than to ask ourselves why our party doesn't appeal to them.

Young people are natural Democrats. But we've somehow managed to lose them. Not a good development.
Anonymous
The Democrats' behavior during Covid was a permanent turnoff for young people.

"We didn't know that force-masking children was wrong! We didn't know that forcing people to get experimental injections or be banned from society was wrong!"

Covid Karens may have felt virtuous in the heat of the moment. But they were suiciding their political party.


Anonymous
My genz kid said why would I want to follow all the Fairfax county public school loser stuff , I want to be successful and make a lot of money .
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:https://www.city-journal.org/article/manhattan-institute-focus-group-gen-z-republicans

Grab a glass of wine and scroll with morbid curiosity and horror


BREAKING: 90% of AmFest respondents support a full immigration moratorium for the United States, Dec 2025

Yeh. Common sense is back in vogue !!!

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The Democrats' behavior during Covid was a permanent turnoff for young people.

"We didn't know that force-masking children was wrong! We didn't know that forcing people to get experimental injections or be banned from society was wrong!"

Covid Karens may have felt virtuous in the heat of the moment. But they were suiciding their political party.




No the Republicans behavior was disgusting.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The current Democratic party obsessive veneration of and "belief" in "The Experts" is hilarious. It's proof positive that the party platform has been taken over by upper middle class strivers. "Climate Scientists" have graduate degrees just like we lawyers and lobbyists do, so they MUST be smart! Saint Fauci is amazing! We must mask the children!"

It's weird seeing the self-described "intellectual" party be so willfully naive on incentives.

In fact climate scientists ARE just like lawyers and lobbyists, they provide their services to the people and groups who pay for them. Are there big financial or career incentives for coming to NON-alarmist positions on the theory of Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming? No, there are not. Quite the contrary, in fact. To be insufficiently alarmist in climate science is to commit career suicide. And lo and behold, "Climate Scientists" know this, so they tend to publish alarmist papers. And the few "lukewarmers" who deviate from the alarmist political line quickly find their grants and publication opportunities drying up.

It's like "well-educated" Democrats have never heard of career incentives, or status signaling, or public choice theory. Public choice theory is a well-established academic discipline that explains the common phenomenon of regulatory capture. But Democrats seem not to have heard of it or not to understand it.


Reread your first sentence a couple of times, and think about how moronic you sound. You sound lime quite the conspiracy nut. I know a lot of scientists and climate scientists. They just want to do their job. The mask mandate and other covid precautions were the same all over the world. I’m a teacher, and kids did not care about the masks. The only ones who complained were the kids of maga parents. Many continued to wear them when they weren’t required.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The current Democratic party obsessive veneration of and "belief" in "The Experts" is hilarious. It's proof positive that the party platform has been taken over by upper middle class strivers. "Climate Scientists" have graduate degrees just like we lawyers and lobbyists do, so they MUST be smart! Saint Fauci is amazing! We must mask the children!"

It's weird seeing the self-described "intellectual" party be so willfully naive on incentives.

In fact climate scientists ARE just like lawyers and lobbyists, they provide their services to the people and groups who pay for them. Are there big financial or career incentives for coming to NON-alarmist positions on the theory of Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming? No, there are not. Quite the contrary, in fact. To be insufficiently alarmist in climate science is to commit career suicide. And lo and behold, "Climate Scientists" know this, so they tend to publish alarmist papers. And the few "lukewarmers" who deviate from the alarmist political line quickly find their grants and publication opportunities drying up.

It's like "well-educated" Democrats have never heard of career incentives, or status signaling, or public choice theory. Public choice theory is a well-established academic discipline that explains the common phenomenon of regulatory capture. But Democrats seem not to have heard of it or not to understand it.


Reread your first sentence a couple of times, and think about how moronic you sound. You sound lime quite the conspiracy nut. I know a lot of scientists and climate scientists. They just want to do their job. The mask mandate and other covid precautions were the same all over the world. I’m a teacher, and kids did not care about the masks. The only ones who complained were the kids of maga parents. Many continued to wear them when they weren’t required.


PP is unhinged. Their condescending (yet Dunning-Kruger) posting style is very recognizable. They keep pretending they’re a Democrat and using “we”, then suddenly switching sides, like Gollum.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It may not help us win elections, but it's psychologically easier to write off Gen Z as dumd and racist than to ask ourselves why our party doesn't appeal to them.

Young people are natural Democrats. But we've somehow managed to lose them. Not a good development.


That’s because YouTube charlatans tell young men what they want to hear: that they are the most important demographic, and society needs to be restructured to cater to them. Democrats are spinach competing with Twinkies. You can’t fault young people for reaching for junk food, but it puts Democrats in the awkward position of having to be the unexciting scolds.
Anonymous
FCPS is so over-the-top woke that they are basically breeding future Trumpers.

Did it never occur to them that kids like rebelling?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The current Democratic party obsessive veneration of and "belief" in "The Experts" is hilarious. It's proof positive that the party platform has been taken over by upper middle class strivers. "Climate Scientists" have graduate degrees just like we lawyers and lobbyists do, so they MUST be smart! Saint Fauci is amazing! We must mask the children!"

It's weird seeing the self-described "intellectual" party be so willfully naive on incentives.

In fact climate scientists ARE just like lawyers and lobbyists, they provide their services to the people and groups who pay for them. Are there big financial or career incentives for coming to NON-alarmist positions on the theory of Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming? No, there are not. Quite the contrary, in fact. To be insufficiently alarmist in climate science is to commit career suicide. And lo and behold, "Climate Scientists" know this, so they tend to publish alarmist papers. And the few "lukewarmers" who deviate from the alarmist political line quickly find their grants and publication opportunities drying up.

It's like "well-educated" Democrats have never heard of career incentives, or status signaling, or public choice theory. Public choice theory is a well-established academic discipline that explains the common phenomenon of regulatory capture. But Democrats seem not to have heard of it or not to understand it.


Reread your first sentence a couple of times, and think about how moronic you sound. You sound lime quite the conspiracy nut. I know a lot of scientists and climate scientists. They just want to do their job. The mask mandate and other covid precautions were the same all over the world. I’m a teacher, and kids did not care about the masks. The only ones who complained were the kids of maga parents. Many continued to wear them when they weren’t required.


Being an upper middle class striver Democrat means never having to say you're sorry.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It may not help us win elections, but it's psychologically easier to write off Gen Z as dumd and racist than to ask ourselves why our party doesn't appeal to them.

Young people are natural Democrats. But we've somehow managed to lose them. Not a good development.


Why are you basing so much on 20 people?
The youth did swing towards Trump. Now they’ve swung away as the economy is in shambles.
Anonymous
https://www.nj.com/politics/2025/12/gen-z-is-revolting-against-trump-and-congress-and-the-results-are-devastating-new-poll.html

Gen Z is revolting against Trump and Congress, and the results are devastating: New poll

Updated: Dec. 05, 2025
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: