Right...that Pinecrest post with 9 ED0 from yesterday. |
Do they all get into top20 schools? This is the question. I don't know as I'm a private school parent. At STA and Sidwell they do. 100%. Do 100% of the top 20% at Langley and the Ws get into top20 schools? |
| Legacies are less than 20 percent of the class at the top Ivies these days. Let’s say they are evenly split between private and public schools, which would mean greater percentage at private schools given how many fewer they are. Numbers are still far too small to account for enrolled classes at Ivies being 35 to 45 percent private school grads. |
| If your kid is super smart it does not matter where they go. Cream rises to the top. I think public is better for such kids. However, if you are average or above average then private schools are really good. In my nephew's case, he had a 3.6 gpa at a top NYC private school and got into a top 20 school and some really good SLACs. He is doing very well because the private school gave him a lot of confidence, a good network and focused on all round development versus just a focus on academics. |
Langley has a class of 525 kids. I don’t even need to look at the data to know that there are not 104 kids at Langley each year admitted to a T20 school. |
Source? Have they published data on private vs. public school kids enrolled? |
Are you posting from the DMV or not? |
Yes, I am in the DMV. |
Because you don't have access to the data, for one thing. But this much is obvious: dozens of Langley students get admitted to UVA every year, and virtually all of them could likely be admitted to a top 20 as well. |
But you're conflating legacy preferences with other types of preferences private school students are more likely to have. Private schools may have a higher % of legacy applicants (and again there's no data), but they will have more "development admits" (aka super rich kids getting a preference because parents are likely to be big donors) and higher enrollment in rich kid sports (water polo, crew etc.) that aren't common at public schools. Plus private school kids are more likely to have greater outside support in terms of college admissions counselors, academic tutors, pay to play summer programs etc. |
And you and your husband now parse the limited data from the "glory days" college that your husband attended years ago and make broad generalizations from it. Got it. |
Again, you're not controlling for the number of kids from private versus public who are actually applying to these schools. Which brings me again to the podunk public school in Nebraska . . . Or, even closer to home, public schools in the DMV. Even at the best of them, it's pretty clear that a far lower percentage of them are applying to Ivies than the privates. |
Correct. I put two kids through Langley. It is not even close to that number. But it is a ridiculous comparison. St. Albans might have 70 kids in a grade at a school with selective admissions. Top 10-20 percent is 7-14 kids. Sure they can get those kids into top schools. Do you have any reason to believe a) your kid is going to get into St. Albans and b) be one of the top 10-14 kids in their class? Odd of that are probably lower than your odds of getting into a T20 from a public school. |
Your first point is important. You should really be looking at the outcomes for the top 10-20% of public students vs. private school students as your comparison. I don't have an answer on the outcomes, but this would be the comparison to do. |
Says the person whose offered zero data, but plenty of hostility and rudeness. |