Who is “They”?

[Anonymous]

"They" didn't shoot Kirk
Robinson shot Kirk

There is no "they" in that exchange.

Sorry Stephen Miller, you're full of crap and I'm not having it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In-group vs. out-group signaling.

"They" was language for Trump supporters to identify the out-group. The embrace of this pronoun is pretty ironic.

But this is vague at best. I mean the shooter is not part of ‘them’ as far as we know. He is a white man from a MAGA family so it’s kind of weird to blame everyone on the left for this crime. Even if Tyler is gay, he is from a white Mormon family in Utah.

[Anonymous]

"They" is anyone who stands in Trump's and--by extension--Stephen Miller's way.

[Anonymous]

I am laughing right now because the more I think about Stephen’s speech the more nonsensical it sounds. Like I keep applying it to different groups and it’s so absurd it’s funny. You can’t apply it to any group, he’s not talking about anyone or he is trying to and then we are all part of ‘them’ other than Stephen’s direct ancestors and lineage. Is that what he is implying?

[Anonymous]

Is Stephen Miller implying that everyone other than white Europeans, some of whom killed his ancestors in the Holocaust, and jews are evil and can never produce anything?

[Anonymous]

as if stephen miller ever produced anything or ever spent a single minute doing any serious manual labor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"They" didn't shoot Kirk
Robinson shot Kirk

There is no "they" in that exchange.

Sorry Stephen Miller, you're full of crap and I'm not having it.

Maybe Robinson identifies as they/them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"They" didn't shoot Kirk
Robinson shot Kirk

There is no "they" in that exchange.

Sorry Stephen Miller, you're full of crap and I'm not having it.

Maybe Robinson identifies as they/them.

But directing that speech at Robinson and his ancestors doesn’t make sense.