| The difference between diagnosing a young child with a lifelong condition, and providing early assistance to a child who may be at risk of developing a condition isn’t semantics. CALT’s can’t diagnose. It is unethical for them to imply that what they can do is substantially the same. |
You are absolutely right, CALTs do not diagnose and I hope I didn’t imply that we can or do. Families come to us after they have been identified or diagnosed either through school or a psychologist. We provide therapy-level instruction in reading, writing, and spelling. And I agree that the difference between identification and diagnosis is more than semantics and I’m sorry I used that term. What I was trying to get at, and I think the psychologist and I clarified, is that early identification should be followed by intervention. My own child was known to have poor phonological skills at 5 but not diagnosed until 7. He didn’t receive services until 7 because of that. This was years ago, I didn’t yet know what the assessment results meant, and school didn’t flag it. I’m hopeful things have changed. |
NP here. Orton-Gillingham is a method, and several programs follow the method: ASDEC's Sounds in Syllables, Wilson, Lindamood Bell, Barton, and IMSE. If you want to learn more, you can read about Orton-Gillingham, and also search the phrase "structured literacy". +1 read Shaywitz's Overcoming Dyslexia and check what the neuropsychologist recommended. Also +1 to PP who said don't jump to text-to-speech yet. In the early elementary years, I'd focus more heavily on remediation (helping your DD learn skills) rather than accommodations (working around whatever skills she doesn't have). |