Why isn’t there chemistry?

[Anonymous]

I've had butterflies for only one man. I bet they wouldn't even last long if we ended up together.
The rest of my butterflies are with men I could not have.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He sounds ideal, OP. Marry him quick.

+1. Or he’ll be the one that got away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think chemistry is vital. It’s what bonds you, makes you want to spend more time with them than you would with a friend, makes you want intimacy and touch beyond just ‘it feels good’. Chemistry to me isn’t just butterflies that more of a force that pulls you together. It is what differentiates between friendship and romantic love.

I guess this explain why so many women file for divorce a decade into their marriage. Many seem to be so desperate to have children that they just pick a guy they can initially tolerate. But that lack of chemistry is probably why suddenly a decade later they show up here screaming I hate my husband, we have nothing in common, I don't wanna spend time with him etc

It's because younger generations are spoiled rotten and expect everything to always be roses and perfect.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Some of my greatest "chemistry" has been with the worst guys, and I would never want them as a long term partner: alcohol issues, womanizer, too physically attractive for their own good, etc. I think certain men may just be nature's way of ensuring the population grows by having them move along to tons of women, and back in the day, creating many offspring. Those men weren't then and aren't now meant to be the ones with whom we settle down. If marriage is what you are ultimately dating for, I would consider being more logical/analytical in what makes a good husband, but if you're not looking for that, then have the best time!

And I guarantee you the men in your first sentence NEVER have a problem meeting women. Women love guys like this because they become a project.