Little League Residency Requirements

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Our league is in a trial period for joining little league for softball and I really hope they ditch it after this year. It is a headache for everyone. Seems wonderful and organized for baseball but not worth it for softball.


100%! Little League is a horrible option for girls and if any other rec programs exist, should not be considered. The boys outnumber the girls by such a large amount, there's no way to keep resources equal and girls will always take a backseat. Girls will always receive less attention and they're given the leftover equipment The uniforms (for older groups) are rarely female fit, but instead unisex. The age groups are too broad, it hinders development. In the youngest ages, girls always are merged with boys and it's such a disservice! Our 6U teams bat from a tee the first couple of weeks, and quickly move to coach pitch. Girls are so much more attentive than boys, they learn more and have much more fun without the distraction and should not be held back because "we need to form a complete team and don't have enough girls".

I've been in the fastpitch world for over 30 years, having daughters play LL, fastpitch only rec leagues, travel ball and college. We now run our own rec program and the difference between our faspitch only league and LL is night and day. I understand the convenience of LL if DD is practicing or playing at the same time/park as DS, but that's the only plus and rarely is the case.

Sorry for the rant, I know I didn't answer OPs question.



There's boys or co-ed rec softball? Where?
OP, how many years did your daughters play baseball?


I think he means that the Little League organization they were in had baseball and tried adding softball but the softball teams were treated like second class citizens. Not surprising at all.


I was following that from the resources perspective but then he said "In the youngest ages, girls always are merged with boys". That insinuates his LL was doing co-ed softball.


Sorry, to clarify, I meant in the youngest ages of LL, there isn't usually a real softball program. Instead, the league will merge girls onto boys' baseball teams. My oldest only played softball, because she was about 10 when she started and at that point LL offered softball. But our youngest played 2 years of LL baseball before we made the move to a girls softball only rec league. Had we stayed with LL, she likely would have played another years of baseball. Our girls played youth softball in 3 different states (military family), with rec ball in 2. When we retired, we moved back to one of those states to continue growing the rec league in another part of town. We have so many girls come to our league letting us know LL is still placing the boys and girls together in minor baseball or that they never got a chance to play as many games as the boys did. Also, LL, with their wide age range teams aren't keeping girls playing. We involve them in umpiring and give them more attention to keep them active in sports past 11 - the age when girls, unless competitive, stop playing sports. LL cannot retain them because the serious girls move on to travel, and the others, being treated as an afterthought, become disinterested.


This is a helpful perspective. I hope Arlington Girls Softball Association leaders are reading some of this.


That post has nothing to do with AGSA, which is softball only and has multiple girls teams at all ages. Did you quote the wrong post?


Little League is making a push for AGSA to merge with them.


Looks like Arlington already has softball, or did this merger with AGSA already happen and now they have an LL charter? Arlington's on the LL tournament schedule.
https://www.vad4ll.net/Default.aspx?tabid=2773091

AGSA is playing in the interleague tournament with the Fairfax leagues also this summer.


AGSA was trying it this year but it looks like McLean knocked all of the AGSA teams out in the first round. Egos are surely bruised.


10-12 Majors still have to play, right? Though the McLean Magic team has beaten a lot of top area travel teams, so...
https://usasoftballofvirginia.com/pages/event/2173379341/2089232878
Anonymous
It’s basically Sage vs. McLean Magic. I had no idea McLean Magic’s teams were so much stronger but they’re clearly dominating.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:McLean Little League has a robust softball program and has gone to the LLWS at least twice. They've had multiple majors teams that have won the state tourney and gone to the regional competition at Warner-Robbins in Georgia. The McLean Magic travel team basically required all the girls to also play rec and that was super competitive because who ever was the coach of the winning rec team got to be the All-Stars majors coach.


Interesting. Are they all on the same rec team and travel team so they’re used to playing together?


When my daughter played MLL, the Magic team was basically the all-star team, but for rec they were split up on different teams. They had 5 majors teams for softball, plus Great Falls LL also played with them, since they only fielded one majors team. The GFLL all-stars were basically their majors team and MLL would beat up on them every year for the district 4 championship.
post reply Forum Index » Sports General Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: