Anonymous wrote:
avalonrose wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
avalonrose wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is silly OP stay.
There is zero reason for you to move to a $850,000 house from a $1.1 house.
You need to move to a $650,000 or less home for this to make any sense.
By the time you factor in move costs this is just wrong.
Where do you get your figures? Realtor fees will cost us about $60k and moving will be approximately $4k. Am i missing something? We still will have at least 150k in profit.
You want to sell your house in order to free up cash. It's not really about lower housing costs as the difference in maintenance and operating costs between a $1M and a $800k property is near nonexistent. Even your property taxes won't change that much. It's really tapping into the equity. But you'd probably spend close to $100k to sell and buy and move etc, just to have access to an extra 100k in cash after paying for the new house. That is where it doesn't make sense and if you really needed cash to pay off debts, then you'd be moving to a 500k townhouse, not slightly downsizing.
The very high costs of selling/buying and moving means moving is a luxury or a disaster. Tell your husband to find a better job and you might also do the same.
Not really sure you're on target here. We'd be moving from 4000 square feet to about 2500 square feet. Taxes where we're looking would be half that of where we are now. We'd be moving from a two story to a one story (lower maintenance costs) Right now we have an HOA....we'd be moving into a non HOA. If we loved our house, I could see your point. But we don't.
It may be intentional or not but you're leaving out a lot of information that is confusing the people who want to give you advice. In the first place, I suspect you're not in the DMV area, right? In most parts of the DMV a $1.1M house is pretty ordinary and it's rare to have a HOA for SF housing outside the minimal fees you sometimes find in more recent subdivisions , so that impacts the advice we think we're giving you. Are you out West? Also, not sure you're right that just moving to a single story house translates into lower maintenance costs (a 2500 sqft one story versus 4k sqft two story means a bigger roof and that translates into a more expensive roof replacement if needed, to use as one example). If your taxes would drop by half simply by moving to a house 25% cheaper, then it means you're moving to a completely different town and also need to see what that translates into regarding schools. Even so, do the potential savings really add up enough to justify moving? Assume 80k to buy/sell/move and a generous 10k in annual savings from living in a smaller house, it'd take you eight years just to recoup the costs of selling and moving.
People who need to downsize due to financial necessities downsize dramatically, not marginally.
The thing is, all of this would just be me giving you superfluous information.
My question was specifically asking about hard money loans, because with the financial situation we're in right now, we would not qualify for a loan that would allow us to purchase a house before selling ours.
Yes, we are looking forward to pocketing a few 100K, but I'm not asking these questions because we are so strapped that we cannot pay our bills.
If we really wanted to stay in the house, we could. It would be difficult but we could do it.
Thing is, we don't WANT to.
I was seeking information about loans that were tied to equity and not income.
That's pretty much it.
This has gotten way off track.