Is Pam Bondi Qualified?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has been doing a good judge winning in court cases, even with hostile partisan judges eager to resist Trump.

I never understood how people can claim a judge is partisan with the sole reason being that Trump lost a case. No shame or embarrassment to make such a juvenile statement.

Many politicians make the same claims and even threaten to pack the Supreme Court.

I understand politicians put in judges who share their thinking with regard to the law but Trump sounds like an idiot calling any judge who rules in someone else’s favor crooked or is on a witch hunt.

And so does every Democrat politician who railed against Supreme Court Justices, Judge Cannon in Florida, and any other judge who ruled in Trump's favor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just won another case at the Supreme Court, where she got a block on the district judge banning the firing of probationary employees.

Well, no. That was the Solicitor General. (Actually the acting SG who came from a big law firm and while morally and ethically bankrupt, is at least an otherwise competent lawyer.) Bondi is the Attorney General. Different position.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just won another case at the Supreme Court, where she got a block on the district judge banning the firing of probationary employees.

Well, no. That was the Solicitor General. (Actually the acting SG who came from a big law firm and while morally and ethically bankrupt, is at least an otherwise competent lawyer.) Bondi is the Attorney General. Different position.

The Solicitor General description …

The Solicitor General determines the cases in which Supreme Court review will be sought by the government and the positions the government will take before the Court. The Office's staff attorneys, Deputy Solicitors General and Assistants to the Solicitor General, participate in preparing the petitions, briefs, and other papers filed by the government in the Supreme Court. The Solicitor General conducts the oral arguments before the Supreme Court. Those cases not argued by the Solicitor General personally are assigned either to an Assistant to the Solicitor General or to another government attorney. The vast majority of government cases are argued by the Solicitor General or one of the office attorneys.

The worker bees. But the Attorney General can step in and do the oral arguments if it’s an important case although I don’t see Bondi doing that. She’s not qualified. The new Solicitor General is John Sauer. He worked for Trump on his civil fraud cases. He argued that Trumps civil fraud charges should be dropped for the good of the country. Sauer did go to Harvard Law School where the majority of Solicitors have gone.

[Anonymous]

What’s up with Pam and no kids? I thought she was a conservative Christian?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What’s up with Pam and no kids? I thought she was a conservative Christian?

So not having kids makes her unqualified to be AG?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s up with Pam and no kids? I thought she was a conservative Christian?

So not having kids makes her unqualified to be AG?

In Project 2025 yes.

She's unqualified because she is a liar.

[Anonymous]

Her problem is her criminality, not her legal qualifications.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What’s up with Pam and no kids? I thought she was a conservative Christian?

There isn't a single Christian in Trump's entire administration.

"Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven." - Matthew 7:21

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s up with Pam and no kids? I thought she was a conservative Christian?

There isn't a single Christian in Trump's entire administration.

"Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven." - Matthew 7:21

There seem to be a fair number of Democrats who go running for the pulpit to espouse political views or defend themselves against allegations of wrongdoing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Her problem is her criminality, not her legal qualifications.

Terrifying example of her criminal misconduct as AG.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/07/us/politics/justice-department-pardon-attorney.html?smid=nytcore-android-share

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think we’ve had a lesser qualified US Attorney General in modern history. As an applicant from Florida she went to UF majoring in Criminal Justice. She went to law school at Stetson University in Florida. The University has about an 85% Acceptance rate. The law school accepts about half of the applicants. The only other Attorney General that didn’t go to top universities was Jeff sessions who went somewhere in Alabama.

Her most famous case was leading some other state Republican Attorneys General in trying to overturn affordable health care. She failed.

She supported and lied for Trump claiming fraud happened in certain states where Trump lost. She was rewarded for her lies byTrump handing her the top attorney position in the country.

Republicans and Democrats used to choose the candidates with top educations and had real accomplishments. Do we tell our children not to bother working for the government because the cheaters have taken over?

Bondi was a well tenured AG for one of our most populated states. That speaks more to her qualifications than your opinion of the quality of law school she attended.

Hate for Bondi due to her association with Trump is fair game. Saying she isn't "qualified" simply because she is a female and went to a "third tier" law school is what pea-brained bigots do.

So you contend that it’s bigotry to point out that she isn’t as capable as other candidates? Is it bigotry to point out that she’s just another mediocre white person DEI hire?

Face it, she’s closer to being qualified to run the Tilt a Whirl at the fair than she ever was getting into a good law school.

Kamala Harris

Kamala Harris was the AG for the most populous state (also the 5th largest economy in the world), US Senator and VP. She was more than qualified.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think we’ve had a lesser qualified US Attorney General in modern history. As an applicant from Florida she went to UF majoring in Criminal Justice. She went to law school at Stetson University in Florida. The University has about an 85% Acceptance rate. The law school accepts about half of the applicants. The only other Attorney General that didn’t go to top universities was Jeff sessions who went somewhere in Alabama.

Her most famous case was leading some other state Republican Attorneys General in trying to overturn affordable health care. She failed.

She supported and lied for Trump claiming fraud happened in certain states where Trump lost. She was rewarded for her lies byTrump handing her the top attorney position in the country.

Republicans and Democrats used to choose the candidates with top educations and had real accomplishments. Do we tell our children not to bother working for the government because the cheaters have taken over?

Bondi was a well tenured AG for one of our most populated states. That speaks more to her qualifications than your opinion of the quality of law school she attended.

Hate for Bondi due to her association with Trump is fair game. Saying she isn't "qualified" simply because she is a female and went to a "third tier" law school is what pea-brained bigots do.

So you contend that it’s bigotry to point out that she isn’t as capable as other candidates? Is it bigotry to point out that she’s just another mediocre white person DEI hire?

Face it, she’s closer to being qualified to run the Tilt a Whirl at the fair than she ever was getting into a good law school.

Kamala Harris

Kamala Harris was the AG for the most populous state (also the 5th largest economy in the world), US Senator and VP. She was more than qualified.

She is a woman of color--fed into the racist misogyny of men.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think we’ve had a lesser qualified US Attorney General in modern history. As an applicant from Florida she went to UF majoring in Criminal Justice. She went to law school at Stetson University in Florida. The University has about an 85% Acceptance rate. The law school accepts about half of the applicants. The only other Attorney General that didn’t go to top universities was Jeff sessions who went somewhere in Alabama.

Her most famous case was leading some other state Republican Attorneys General in trying to overturn affordable health care. She failed.

She supported and lied for Trump claiming fraud happened in certain states where Trump lost. She was rewarded for her lies byTrump handing her the top attorney position in the country.

Republicans and Democrats used to choose the candidates with top educations and had real accomplishments. Do we tell our children not to bother working for the government because the cheaters have taken over?

Bondi was a well tenured AG for one of our most populated states. That speaks more to her qualifications than your opinion of the quality of law school she attended.

Hate for Bondi due to her association with Trump is fair game. Saying she isn't "qualified" simply because she is a female and went to a "third tier" law school is what pea-brained bigots do.

She also refused to bring criminal charges against Trump for the Trump University fraud, before he was president. She somehow managed to ignore the Jeffrey Epstein tapes of children. She’s corrupt and she’s collecting her reward from Trump. I’d like an AG with a deep knowledge and love for American law. She doesn’t have it.

[Anonymous]

Her only qualification for Trump is her obsequent loyalty to him and, this, she is eminently qualified.

How’s that power-vocabulary app working out for you?!?!

DP. That you think this is not a word people know and use without a vocab app miiiiight just say more about you than you realize…

What is wrong with PP that she thinks that is a big word that even a high school student would know? Read more. Learn words.

[Anonymous]

“There seem to be a fair number of Democrats who go running for the pulpit to espouse political views or defend themselves against allegations of wrongdoing.”

I’m sure you can give examples. Your blanket statement is otherwise meaningless.