Vanderbilt...overrated on DCUM?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is there this idea that its more difficult to get into than peer schools?
I've seen students get in ED/ED2 with 93+/3.7+ with no test scores, including no AP scores, not top 10%, regular ECs, etc.

sample size of 1. My own kid. Valedictorian (public school), perfect GPA, 1560 SAT, varsity sports, decent ECs. Got into multiple T10s and WL at Vanderbilt.

Valedictorian at our private with 1580 SAT got rejected ED1 at Vandy within last few cycles.

[Anonymous]

I see Vanderbilt as a safety for very rich kids who are decent students.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I see Vanderbilt as a safety for very rich kids who are decent students.

Isn't that USC (albeit maybe more semi-decent than decent)?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People have said it is in the same tier as BC. Take that for what you will

Let's not lie, but it's the same as Emory,Notre Dame, Georgetown etc. Actually Georgetown and Emory are likely harder to get into, at least from our private. Georgetown is test required, and Emory accepts less test optional students. Emory also doesn't look at Freshman grads so some students GPA drops woth Emory if they did poorly sophomore year.

Emory is really easy from our private. Like top 30 to 40 percent of class if you ED. Vandy and GT legit hard admits. My kid isn’t at any of these schools.

Can say the same about Vandy, so you're proving my point. Also Gatech yeild protects heavily (see test scores) And they play the differ game moreso than other schools.

My point is that Emory is a significantly easier admit from the private my kids attend than Vandy or GT. That does not prove your point.

Maybe reread, One I don't beileve you, either way I'm saying Vandy admissions isn't different than Emory admissions so Emory is easier at your school but harder at mine and vise versa. Gatech isn't elite so who cares really, no one was talking about it. GT knows private school students don't want a public school so they yeild protect.

GT is Georgetown not GATech.

Georgetown is GU.

[Anonymous]

I'm so old that when I was college age, Vandy was considered more or less "unmotivated rich kid's school" - I guess it's still for rich kids but they have to try harder to get in now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I see Vanderbilt as a safety for very rich kids who are decent students.

Maybe 20 years ago. It's a different world today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I see Vanderbilt as a safety for very rich kids who are decent students.

A safety with an admit rate below 10 percent?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see Vanderbilt as a safety for very rich kids who are decent students.

Isn't that USC (albeit maybe more semi-decent than decent)?

USC doesn't even have ED and already 11% acceptance rate and 43% yield.
The school actully are full of so called striver kids. Hence

https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-engineering/

https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-tech/

https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-banking/

Welcome to the 21st century granny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vanderbilt also has an education school which lots of DMV kids do for a much easier shot. Our college counselor recommended this.

80k a year to be a fricking k12 teacher?

No. You get in for education and switch majors.

my kid decided against this but this is the advice of college counselors.

Actually, at Vanderbilt a ton of students transfer into Peabody from other schools and do the Human and Organizational Development major. Lots go into business from there. Used to be more of a jock major, but now it seems like everyone there is transferring into it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I see Vanderbilt as a safety for very rich kids who are decent students.

Correct. It's another Wash U. Both fine schools. But this is the role they play in this board game we're playing.

[Anonymous]

It’s a trendy thing. The less bright if the crown kids attend—while their smarter sibs attend the Ivy.

The southern thing became big.

[Anonymous]

^less bright of the celeb sibs

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see Vanderbilt as a safety for very rich kids who are decent students.

Correct. It's another Wash U. Both fine schools. But this is the role they play in this board game we're playing.

100% the less bright celebrity kids attend.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see Vanderbilt as a safety for very rich kids who are decent students.

Correct. It's another Wash U. Both fine schools. But this is the role they play in this board game we're playing.

Incorrect. You’ll need to do much more than be a decent student. The bar for stats is interchangeable with Cornell, Brown and Duke.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see Vanderbilt as a safety for very rich kids who are decent students.

Correct. It's another Wash U. Both fine schools. But this is the role they play in this board game we're playing.

100% the less bright celebrity kids attend.

Doesn’t Gwyneth Paltrow’s kid go there?