Which goverment agencies are going to take the biggest hit in terms of downsizing - people losing jobs?

[Anonymous]

Yikes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:SEC. Many republicans want it gone and the others want say it could lose a lot of people.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA . . . Lie. Project 2025 wants the SEC to take over more duties. If anything some want the CFTC gone (merged into the SEC)

[Anonymous]

This assumes far too much forethought. They will lay off all conditional employees next, so whatever agency has recently hired people.

[Anonymous]

Treasury is done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What are the most common jobs to go ? Are they executive or adminstrative ( I do not work in goverment so I am just curious)

Almost none. None of this talk is real.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:SEC. Many republicans want it gone and the others want say it could lose a lot of people.

Yedah -- off a bit. SEC is set to get bigger not smaller.

[Anonymous]

They will target agencies where employees contributed to the Harris campaign. Stephen Miller said it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They have checked payroll against public political contributions records to find the highest concentrations of D voters, and will cull within those agencies/departments.

“Miller continued: 'We looked at USAID as an example, 98 percent either donated to Kamala Harris or another left-wing candidate.’”
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/media/article-14336461/amp/Jake-Tapper-Stephen-Miller-trump-freeze-fed-spending.html

How is this not completely illegal discrimination as a metric for where to make cuts? How stupid do they have to be to say this aloud? I mean theoretically it would go through the courts, but they are speeding up that decision by blatantly bragging about being corrupt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They have checked payroll against public political contributions records to find the highest concentrations of D voters, and will cull within those agencies/departments.

“Miller continued: 'We looked at USAID as an example, 98 percent either donated to Kamala Harris or another left-wing candidate.’”
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/media/article-14336461/amp/Jake-Tapper-Stephen-Miller-trump-freeze-fed-spending.html

How is this not completely illegal discrimination as a metric for where to make cuts? How stupid do they have to be to say this aloud? I mean theoretically it would go through the courts, but they are speeding up that decision by blatantly bragging about being corrupt.

Exaclty.

They are offering the buy out because they know legally they can't do the RIF they want.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Treasury is done.

WHY?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What are the most common jobs to go ? Are they executive or adminstrative ( I do not work in goverment so I am just curious)

Almost none. None of this talk is real.

Stop the denial.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What are the most common jobs to go ? Are they executive or adminstrative ( I do not work in goverment so I am just curious)

Almost none. None of this talk is real.

It's amazing to see the denial in real time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they’re rationale, FinRegs would be last. Since they’re self funded.

They can’t RIF FinRegs. They would need to compel the agencies to do it themselves. They would do it, if compelled.

Why do you say this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they’re rationale, FinRegs would be last. Since they’re self funded.

They can’t RIF FinRegs. They would need to compel the agencies to do it themselves. They would do it, if compelled.

Why do you say they can’t RIF financial regulators?

Nice try, Amanda. Or is it the 18 year old?

https://www.wired.com/story/elon-musk-lackeys-office-personnel-management-opm-neuralink-x-boring-stalin/

That article is completely irrelevant to the question of whether they can RIF financial regulators.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They will target agencies where employees contributed to the Harris campaign. Stephen Miller said it.

Well...that's going to be 100% of all agencies.