Anyone else depressed that our country elected a disgusting man to the presidency?

[Anonymous]

Kamala could have won if she had announced strong support for centrist policies like a strong border and protection of women’s spaces. All she offered was more of the same and people didn’t want that. If Republicans had run someone less horrible, the gulf would have been even wider.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This man has proven himself to be racist, misogynistic, homophobic, ableist, and everything else disgusting. He is playing his loyal followers and they are blind. And his cabinet picks are the lowest of the low. How do his followers not see this? I’m so depressed that this is who our kids are supposed to up to.

How bad was the other guy, that they couldn't beat such an obviously poor candidate?

Harris was fine.

Too many idiots believed RW propaganda.

American voters, this is what the left thinks of you if you don’t elect them: idiots.

Americans, you are idiots for believing RW propaganda.

We have eyes. We see what’s happening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This man has proven himself to be racist, misogynistic, homophobic, ableist, and everything else disgusting. He is playing his loyal followers and they are blind. And his cabinet picks are the lowest of the low. How do his followers not see this? I’m so depressed that this is who our kids are supposed to up to.

How bad was the other guy, that they couldn't beat such an obviously poor candidate?

Harris was fine.

Too many idiots believed RW propaganda.

No she wasn’t. A strong woman of color with military experience who is beloved by Joe Rogan would have mopped the floor with Trump, but the Dems smeared her as a Russian asset. Instead of catering to strong women with appeal to moderates and the working class, the Dems chose to nominate a woke politician from San Fransisco with zero appeal in the Rust Belt and here we are.

You would think Dems would learn from this and 2016, but they’re going to nominate someone that only appeals to UMC white voters in Bethesda again and get the same results in 2028.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This man has proven himself to be racist, misogynistic, homophobic, ableist, and everything else disgusting. He is playing his loyal followers and they are blind. And his cabinet picks are the lowest of the low. How do his followers not see this? I’m so depressed that this is who our kids are supposed to up to.

How bad was the other guy, that they couldn't beat such an obviously poor candidate?

Harris was fine.

Too many idiots believed RW propaganda.

American voters, this is what the left thinks of you if you don’t elect them: idiots.

Americans, you are idiots for believing RW propaganda.

We have eyes. We see what’s happening.

Yes, what a good amount of people saw. She ran a bad campaign and was a bad candidate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kamala could have won if she had announced strong support for centrist policies like a strong border and protection of women’s spaces. All she offered was more of the same and people didn’t want that. If Republicans had run someone less horrible, the gulf would have been even wider.

It wouldn’t have worked because she doesn’t believe all these things. Tusli believes all these things and would have beaten Trump, but she doesn’t want to line Lockheed Martin’s, Google’s, and Pfizer’s pockets so the Dems would rather lose the election and raise money off of Orange Man is a Nazi manufactured grievance than winning an election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I prefer a disgusting man to an objective imbecile

Fcking misogynists: eat sht and die.

Awwwwwwww, you haz a sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I prefer a disgusting man to an objective imbecile

She was at many times very inarticulate. If she would have vehemently gave answers on securing the border. Certainly.. not saying on The View she couldn't think of anything she would have done differently...she may have had a chance. She wasn't respected as a VP, the Dems really messed up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This man has proven himself to be racist, misogynistic, homophobic, ableist, and everything else disgusting. He is playing his loyal followers and they are blind. And his cabinet picks are the lowest of the low. How do his followers not see this? I’m so depressed that this is who our kids are supposed to up to.

How bad was the other guy, that they couldn't beat such an obviously poor candidate?

Harris was fine.

Too many idiots believed RW propaganda.

No she wasn’t. A strong woman of color with military experience who is beloved by Joe Rogan would have mopped the floor with Trump, but the Dems smeared her as a Russian asset. Instead of catering to strong women with appeal to moderates and the working class, the Dems chose to nominate a woke politician from San Fransisco with zero appeal in the Rust Belt and here we are.

You would think Dems would learn from this and 2016, but they’re going to nominate someone that only appeals to UMC white voters in Bethesda again and get the same results in 2028.

My fingers are crossed that this is EXACTLY what they’ll do. Stay out of touch with country, and focus on the DC suburban bubble dwellers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I prefer a disgusting man to an objective imbecile

She couldn't answer standard policy questions. He was the much better choice, it was clear, why he won.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This man has proven himself to be racist, misogynistic, homophobic, ableist, and everything else disgusting. He is playing his loyal followers and they are blind. And his cabinet picks are the lowest of the low. How do his followers not see this? I’m so depressed that this is who our kids are supposed to up to.

How bad was the other guy, that they couldn't beat such an obviously poor candidate?

Harris was fine.

Too many idiots believed RW propaganda.

American voters, this is what the left thinks of you if you don’t elect them: idiots.

Americans, you are idiots for believing RW propaganda.

Shouldn’t you be making good on your promise to fly home if Trump won? Or were you lying? Again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This man has proven himself to be racist, misogynistic, homophobic, ableist, and everything else disgusting. He is playing his loyal followers and they are blind. And his cabinet picks are the lowest of the low. How do his followers not see this? I’m so depressed that this is who our kids are supposed to up to.

How bad was the other guy, that they couldn't beat such an obviously poor candidate?

Harris was fine.

Too many idiots believed RW propaganda.

American voters, this is what the left thinks of you if you don’t elect them: idiots.

Americans, you are idiots for believing RW propaganda.

We have eyes. We see what’s happening.

Yes, what a good amount of people saw. She ran a bad campaign and was a bad candidate.

And yet infinitely better than Trump in every way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This man has proven himself to be racist, misogynistic, homophobic, ableist, and everything else disgusting. He is playing his loyal followers and they are blind. And his cabinet picks are the lowest of the low. How do his followers not see this? I’m so depressed that this is who our kids are supposed to up to.

How bad was the other guy, that they couldn't beat such an obviously poor candidate?

Harris was fine.

Too many idiots believed RW propaganda.

American voters, this is what the left thinks of you if you don’t elect them: idiots.

Americans, you are idiots for believing RW propaganda.

Shouldn’t you be making good on your promise to fly home if Trump won? Or were you lying? Again.

“Fly home”? I am home, turd.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This man has proven himself to be racist, misogynistic, homophobic, ableist, and everything else disgusting. He is playing his loyal followers and they are blind. And his cabinet picks are the lowest of the low. How do his followers not see this? I’m so depressed that this is who our kids are supposed to up to.

What is depressing is that urban elites lost 2016 and still demand their cheap foreign labor

When will democrats be the party of labor? Again?

And help the 60% of US workers without college degrees ?

We do! You are just too brainwashed to notice it.

Which party supports unions?
Which party supports raising the minimum wage?
Which party supports higher taxes for the super rich so as to pay for lower and middle class programs?
Which party has tried to make healthcare and childcare more affordable?

All of these are Democratic initiatives. Trump’s message, for some baffling reason, resonates with the working class, but he does nothing to help them.

Trump and Vance is the most pro Union Republican in our lifetimes. His Labor Secretary nominee, Rep. Lori Chavez-DeReme, is pro Union and is pissing off the types of country club Republicans this forum adores. JD Vance wants to prosecute the freight train company execs that poisoned Palestine, OH and the Teamsters president is a big fan.

You’re acting like these people elected Mitt Romney or some far right libertarian. Trump has more in common with Bernie Sanders than these types of Republicans on a lot of issues, NAFTA being one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I prefer a disgusting man to an objective imbecile

She couldn't answer standard policy questions. He was the much better choice, it was clear, why he won.

That’s not really true though. She DID answer policy questions. Specifically, she was asked if there were any Biden policies she would change, and she thought for a minute, and then said “no, not really”.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I prefer a disgusting man to an objective imbecile

She couldn't answer standard policy questions. He was the much better choice, it was clear, why he won.

She answered much better than he did.

But he’s a b-list reality tv actor who lies constantly. So clearly the idiots went with him.