Fairfax County Public Schools secretly sold China a 'Handbook to Clone' TJ, the top math school in the US. In exchange f

[Anonymous]

I don't understand why this would be a problem? Can someone explain what is wrong with this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why this would be a problem? Can someone explain what is wrong with this?

In general the CCP has been conducting a lot of influence campaigns in US schools (most notably colleges and universities) recently. This is seen by the original authors (National Review, not Daily Wire) as an extension of that.

Whether it actually is an influence campaign is incredibly unclear at this point, at least in the Daily Wire article linked.

I suppose if you think TJ is some sort of national treasure it would also bother you to have it so easily exported, or exported while the public was kept in the dark about the fact. As a TJ grad I am quite convinced the US has many other good schools, though most of the comparable ones are private.

[Anonymous]

Math is Math. TJ parents on this board go crazy over Russian Math. They pay to send their kids to tutoring to learn Math the way the Russians do. So why don't we stop calling the kettle black. In fact, just have the Chinese get the Math straight from the Russians and leave us out of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If FCPS can make an easy $3.6M by selling a copy of plans that they already have, good for them. I don't see the problem.

+1.

[Anonymous]

DAILY WIRE

Misinformation crap.

[Anonymous]

Follow the money. How much does former principal Geoff Jones get paid?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Math is Math. TJ parents on this board go crazy over Russian Math. They pay to send their kids to tutoring to learn Math the way the Russians do. So why don't we stop calling the kettle black. In fact, just have the Chinese get the Math straight from the Russians and leave us out of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In China, the Asian students go to these schools. The parents are very invested in these programs and their kids education.

In US, the Asian students go to these schools. The parents are very invested in these programs and their kids education.

ITS SAME -SAME. Why worry?

Theoretically you worry because you would rather the competition not get an edge in the cutting edge technology race. Do you really want other nations to have quantum computers before us? Space weapons? Other unknown next gen tech?

This is HIGH SCHOOL, you freakin' lunatic.

[Anonymous]

Absent concerns that they didn't actually get paid, I am struggling to find something objectionable here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Absent concerns that they didn't actually get paid, I am struggling to find something objectionable here.

This is the steelman version of the argument: https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/10/the-american-educators-helping-chinas-military/

You'll note even the comments section isn't buying it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Luke Rosiak is a right wing extremist from Great Falls. And he's also an extreme hack.

That may be true without meaning his information is false.

As someone said on a different thread yesterday, attacking the person sharing the information is an ad hominem fallacy and doesn't make your argument. You have to actually prove that either TJ/people employed at TJ didn't sell this information or prove why it doesn't matter that they did sell this information.

And therein lies the rub. He's published so much crap over the years and distorted so much reality, that I wouldn't trust anything he writes even if it were the truest truth that ever truthed. You can't publish a mountain of crap and then publish a one off that may actually be true and expect the public to all of a sudden take it at face value. How do we know that this is not one more article to add to his crap pile.

I understand your concern about the reliability of a source that has published questionable material in the past. It’s reasonable to approach information with caution when it comes from someone with a history of distortion. However, dismissing everything a person says just because of their past isn't sound reasoning either. That would be an example of a “genetic fallacy”, where we assume something must be false purely because of its source.

For context, I’ve never heard of Mr. Rosiak before, so I don’t have any biases for or against him. But regardless of the source, the best approach is to focus on the content itself and whether it's verifiable through **independent evidence**. Instead of dismissing the article outright, it’s more productive to ask: Can the claims in this specific case be corroborated by other sources? If they can be, then it doesn't matter who first published it. The truth remains the truth, regardless of the source. If it can't be verified, then it's reasonable to be skeptical. Ultimately, the claims should be evaluated based on evidence, not the person making them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Theoretically you worry because you would rather the competition not get an edge in the cutting edge technology race. Do you really want other nations to have quantum computers before us? Space weapons? Other unknown next gen tech?

America imports their talent. They attend graduate school at a top univserity and raise their kid to represent america in the math olympiad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In China, the Asian students go to these schools. The parents are very invested in these programs and their kids education.

In US, the Asian students go to these schools. The parents are very invested in these programs and their kids education.

ITS SAME -SAME. Why worry?

Theoretically you worry because you would rather the competition not get an edge in the cutting edge technology race. Do you really want other nations to have quantum computers before us? Space weapons? Other unknown next gen tech?

No worries. Those Asian students will apply for US graduate schools and work for US after they earn their degrees.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Luke Rosiak is a right wing extremist from Great Falls. And he's also an extreme hack.

That may be true without meaning his information is false.

As someone said on a different thread yesterday, attacking the person sharing the information is an ad hominem fallacy and doesn't make your argument. You have to actually prove that either TJ/people employed at TJ didn't sell this information or prove why it doesn't matter that they did sell this information.

And therein lies the rub. He's published so much crap over the years and distorted so much reality, that I wouldn't trust anything he writes even if it were the truest truth that ever truthed. You can't publish a mountain of crap and then publish a one off that may actually be true and expect the public to all of a sudden take it at face value. How do we know that this is not one more article to add to his crap pile.

I understand your concern about the reliability of a source that has published questionable material in the past. It’s reasonable to approach information with caution when it comes from someone with a history of distortion. However, dismissing everything a person says just because of their past isn't sound reasoning either. That would be an example of a “genetic fallacy”, where we assume something must be false purely because of its source.

For context, I’ve never heard of Mr. Rosiak before, so I don’t have any biases for or against him. But regardless of the source, the best approach is to focus on the content itself and whether it's verifiable through **independent evidence**. Instead of dismissing the article outright, it’s more productive to ask: Can the claims in this specific case be corroborated by other sources? If they can be, then it doesn't matter who first published it. The truth remains the truth, regardless of the source. If it can't be verified, then it's reasonable to be skeptical. Ultimately, the claims should be evaluated based on evidence, not the person making them.

good idea. Can you point to independently verified evidence?

[Anonymous]

I’ll bet China’s Asian enrollment will be off the chain.