Trump rallies

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Hope he keeps it under two hours. His last one was just under two hours and people were visibly bored.

I don't get how he can keep audiences engaged with his rambling gibberish. Is it going to be Hannibal Lecter again tonight or is it Freddy Krueger or some other random thing?

Why would you get anything?
You hate his success!

His success? He's successful at spewing lies, nonsense and gibberish.

So far... something about Kamala confiscating everyone's guns. There's no such proposal whatsoever. Again that incoherent nonsense "about aborting babies AFTER they are born."
Picked up Rick Scott's lie about Kamala and Democrats "cutting 280 million from Medicare" https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/oct/31/rick-scott/rick-scott-repeats-false-claim-democrats-cut-280-b/
Kamala "wants to eliminate beef" - another lie https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/aug/14/facebook-posts/no-kamala-harris-didnt-say-she-wants-eliminate-bee/
Lie after lie after lie.

How can you call someone who can only lie a "success?"

Kamala in 2020
“Certain countries have changed their dietary guidelines to reduce the consumption of red meat in light of the impact of the climate change,” the voter said during the 2019 climate crisis CNN town hall. “If elected, will you be supporting a change in dietary guidelines, and then how will you plan on implementing the changes so that people effectively change their diets?”

“Yeah, I mean… There is, I think, of the point that you’re raising… in a broader context, which is that as a nation, we actually have to have a real priority at the highest level of government around what we eat and in terms of healthy eating, because we have a problem in America,” the then-senator responded.

“And we can talk about all that… We can talk about the amount of sugar in everything… We could talk about soda. We could go on and on,” Harris continued, before saying, “So the answer is yes, but I will also say this… the balance that we have to strike here… is about what government can and should do around creating incentives and then banning certain behaviors.”

Only in Breitbartland...

Kamala: "I love cheeseburgers" = Breitbart: "KAMALA WANTS TO BAN ALL BEEF!!!!"

Did you listen to what Kamala actually said?

Yes, I did. She did not say ban all beef.

But she does want to reduce the amount of red meat Americans eat.

That’s true. Then Kamala does her signature cackle and says “I love cheeseburgers!”

Nothing to see here, average American.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:he’s talking about energy independence and gas prices

then you must be listening to a different speech because he seems to take great delight in describing the rapes and murders of young women and girls

No, he’s talking about the rapes and murders of American young women and girls by illegal immigrants.

Talking about something people are concerned about and telling his supporters he wants to stop those things is not taking great delight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He’s ranting and raving. Election was rigged, Kamala is a radical left lunatic, the usual. Not a single statement included any substantive content.

62% Concerned About Election Cheating

Wednesday, July 24, 2024

Most voters think this year’s election could be impacted by cheating, nearly one-in-five say they received multiple mail-in ballots in 2020 and nine percent (9%) of voters nationally are either not U.S. citizens or aren’t sure if they’re citizens.

A new telephone and online survey by Rasmussen Reports and the Heartland Institute finds that 62% of Likely Voters are concerned that cheating will affect the outcome of the 2024 election, including 37% who are Very Concerned. Thirty-five percent (35%) aren’t concerned about election cheating, including 15% who are Not At All Concerned. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Eighteen percent (18%) say that, in the 2020 election, they personally received more than one official ballot in the mail or received a ballot for someone who does not live at their address, while 74% did not. The number who say they got multiple mail-in ballots in 2020 is higher (20%) among voters in six states (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin) viewed as key “battlegrounds” in this year’s election. “The fact that more than 60% of likely voters are concerned about election integrity should be a massive wake-up call to all those who refuse to admit that potential cheating in elections is a major problem,” said Chris Talgo, editorial director of The Heartland Institute.

Most voters think this year’s election could be impacted by cheating, nearly one-in-five say they received multiple mail-in ballots in 2020 and nine percent (9%) of voters nationally are either not U.S. citizens or aren’t sure if they’re citizens.

A new telephone and online survey by Rasmussen Reports and the Heartland Institute finds that 62% of Likely Voters are concerned that cheating will affect the outcome of the 2024 election, including 37% who are Very Concerned. Thirty-five percent (35%) aren’t concerned about election cheating, including 15% who are Not At All Concerned. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Eighteen percent (18%) say that, in the 2020 election, they personally received more than one official ballot in the mail or received a ballot for someone who does not live at their address, while 74% did not. The number who say they got multiple mail-in ballots in 2020 is higher (20%) among voters in six states (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin) viewed as key “battlegrounds” in this year’s election. “The fact that more than 60% of likely voters are concerned about election integrity should be a massive wake-up call to all those who refuse to admit that potential cheating in elections is a major problem,” said Chris Talgo, editorial director of The Heartland Institute.

Most voters think this year’s election could be impacted by cheating, nearly one-in-five say they received multiple mail-in ballots in 2020 and nine percent (9%) of voters nationally are either not U.S. citizens or aren’t sure if they’re citizens.

A new telephone and online survey by Rasmussen Reports and the Heartland Institute finds that 62% of Likely Voters are concerned that cheating will affect the outcome of the 2024 election, including 37% who are Very Concerned. Thirty-five percent (35%) aren’t concerned about election cheating, including 15% who are Not At All Concerned. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Eighteen percent (18%) say that, in the 2020 election, they personally received more than one official ballot in the mail or received a ballot for someone who does not live at their address, while 74% did not. The number who say they got multiple mail-in ballots in 2020 is higher (20%) among voters in six states (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin) viewed as key “battlegrounds” in this year’s election. “The fact that more than 60% of likely voters are concerned about election integrity should be a massive wake-up call to all those who refuse to admit that potential cheating in elections is a major problem,” said Chris Talgo, editorial director of The Heartland Institute.

https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/partner_surveys/62_concerned_about_election_cheating

The majority of people seem to be worried about election fraud.

"Tell a lie often enough and people start to believe it" - The words of Joseph Goebbels, Third Reich Minister of Propaganda

Now Rasmussen reports are Nazis?

No. People believe the election was stolen, because they have repeatedly been told the lie that it was stolen by Trump and his surrogates.

The link from Rasmussen is talking about current elections.

No shit, Sherlock. They were lied to and told that the last election was stolen, and they are being lied to that the next election will be stolen (unless Trump wins, of course). That's why they are telling Rasmussen what they are telling them. You really are pretty slow at comprehending this.

What? Didn’t Putin and Russia try to interfere in our elections and hack our vote? Our polling booths weren’t hacked by Russia?

That’s all we’ve been told by democrats and the msm for years. Are you telling us that isn’t true?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He’s ranting and raving. Election was rigged, Kamala is a radical left lunatic, the usual. Not a single statement included any substantive content.

This is why he is saying he’s happy to have a debate. He doesn’t have to study anything like actual facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Notice how they don't show the upper deck areas. They're empty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice how they don't show the upper deck areas. They're empty.

Still not showing those. And in the first angle they were. Keep trying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Hope he keeps it under two hours. His last one was just under two hours and people were visibly bored.

I don't get how he can keep audiences engaged with his rambling gibberish. Is it going to be Hannibal Lecter again tonight or is it Freddy Krueger or some other random thing?

Why would you get anything?
You hate his success!

His success? He's successful at spewing lies, nonsense and gibberish.

So far... something about Kamala confiscating everyone's guns. There's no such proposal whatsoever. Again that incoherent nonsense "about aborting babies AFTER they are born."
Picked up Rick Scott's lie about Kamala and Democrats "cutting 280 million from Medicare" https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/oct/31/rick-scott/rick-scott-repeats-false-claim-democrats-cut-280-b/
Kamala "wants to eliminate beef" - another lie https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/aug/14/facebook-posts/no-kamala-harris-didnt-say-she-wants-eliminate-bee/
Lie after lie after lie.

How can you call someone who can only lie a "success?"

Kamala in 2020
“Certain countries have changed their dietary guidelines to reduce the consumption of red meat in light of the impact of the climate change,” the voter said during the 2019 climate crisis CNN town hall. “If elected, will you be supporting a change in dietary guidelines, and then how will you plan on implementing the changes so that people effectively change their diets?”

“Yeah, I mean… There is, I think, of the point that you’re raising… in a broader context, which is that as a nation, we actually have to have a real priority at the highest level of government around what we eat and in terms of healthy eating, because we have a problem in America,” the then-senator responded.

“And we can talk about all that… We can talk about the amount of sugar in everything… We could talk about soda. We could go on and on,” Harris continued, before saying, “So the answer is yes, but I will also say this… the balance that we have to strike here… is about what government can and should do around creating incentives and then banning certain behaviors.”

Only in Breitbartland...

Kamala: "I love cheeseburgers" = Breitbart: "KAMALA WANTS TO BAN ALL BEEF!!!!"

Did you listen to what Kamala actually said?

Yes, I did. She did not say ban all beef.

DP. She said, "banning certain behaviors.” That certainly sounds ominous.

[Anonymous]

Any body else catch when he said "let's take back the WHITE House" - stressing the White, leaving a bit of a pause before saying House?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:he’s talking about energy independence and gas prices

then you must be listening to a different speech because he seems to take great delight in describing the rapes and murders of young women and girls

No, he’s talking about the rapes and murders of American young women and girls by illegal immigrants.

Talking about something people are concerned about and telling his supporters he wants to stop those things is not taking great delight.

Wow, an established rapist talking about rapes. I guess he'd know something about that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Any body else catch when he said "let's take back the WHITE House" - stressing the White, leaving a bit of a pause before saying House?

No. I think you need to get an ear wax removal kit. Or two.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Any body else catch when he said "let's take back the WHITE House" - stressing the White, leaving a bit of a pause before saying House?

Nice try, but no. Keep on lying!

[Anonymous]

One has to wonder what the average IQ at these rallies is...

[Anonymous]

Again, very low energy. No smiles. The man has all of the charisma and sex appeal of a sleepy hog. What do his fans see?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Hope he keeps it under two hours. His last one was just under two hours and people were visibly bored.

I don't get how he can keep audiences engaged with his rambling gibberish. Is it going to be Hannibal Lecter again tonight or is it Freddy Krueger or some other random thing?

Why would you get anything?
You hate his success!

His success? He's successful at spewing lies, nonsense and gibberish.

So far... something about Kamala confiscating everyone's guns. There's no such proposal whatsoever. Again that incoherent nonsense "about aborting babies AFTER they are born."
Picked up Rick Scott's lie about Kamala and Democrats "cutting 280 million from Medicare" https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/oct/31/rick-scott/rick-scott-repeats-false-claim-democrats-cut-280-b/
Kamala "wants to eliminate beef" - another lie https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/aug/14/facebook-posts/no-kamala-harris-didnt-say-she-wants-eliminate-bee/
Lie after lie after lie.

How can you call someone who can only lie a "success?"

Kamala in 2020
“Certain countries have changed their dietary guidelines to reduce the consumption of red meat in light of the impact of the climate change,” the voter said during the 2019 climate crisis CNN town hall. “If elected, will you be supporting a change in dietary guidelines, and then how will you plan on implementing the changes so that people effectively change their diets?”

“Yeah, I mean… There is, I think, of the point that you’re raising… in a broader context, which is that as a nation, we actually have to have a real priority at the highest level of government around what we eat and in terms of healthy eating, because we have a problem in America,” the then-senator responded.

“And we can talk about all that… We can talk about the amount of sugar in everything… We could talk about soda. We could go on and on,” Harris continued, before saying, “So the answer is yes, but I will also say this… the balance that we have to strike here… is about what government can and should do around creating incentives and then banning certain behaviors.”

Only in Breitbartland...

Kamala: "I love cheeseburgers" = Breitbart: "KAMALA WANTS TO BAN ALL BEEF!!!!"

Did you listen to what Kamala actually said?

Yes, I did. She did not say ban all beef.

But she does want to reduce the amount of red meat Americans eat.

That’s true. Then Kamala does her signature cackle and says “I love cheeseburgers!”

Nothing to see here, average American.

So does every doctor, nutritionist, and public health professional in America.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:One has to wonder what the average IQ at these rallies is...

Doesn’t matter. Just need to be US citizens registered to vote (legally).