Some of the 1600 kids never applied to Top 10 because it's too expensive for them (maybe donut-hole family) |
Ok so no such thing as yield protection. ok that's at least consistent. |
No s**t...that is why I called it yield protection. There are plenty of instances where kids completely phone in the "Why university X question". They don't mention anything unique to the school, or a program, etc. I mean, it is entirely possible that when a kid applies to 15 schools, they are only really interested in 8 of them, and those applications are much better than the remaining 7. |
That's fine...then that kid would have showed LSU that they really want to attend LSU. |
Well Harvard has EA and typically defers over 70% of those students. Being a T5 school, they know that majority who get accepted will matriculate. With these deferrals, they can now offer admission in RD to many students who were EA. This means they know majority will accept---they already signaled they really wanted to attend Harvard
Same with ED at any of the other T5 schools. If you defer most of ED to RD, the school knows that majority accepted will ultimately attend. So yield can be really high. |
Case definately "yield protects". But it's challenging. Visit case, talk to students there. It's a running joke that it's everyone's 2nd/3rd/4th choice--it's not most kids top choice. 75-80% of the students (so it seems) top choices were in the T25/30==those kids would be attending one of those had they gotten admission. That means they had the resume to get in, but didn't win the lottery. Case knows that--they are a "excellent backup in a location many are not thrilled about" for many high stats students. They know they have a yield protection issue. So yes, if they think your kid is not that interested and is using them as a backup, they will defer or WL. I don't view yield protection as a bad thing---it's up to your kid to convince a top school that your kid really wants to attend. Ultimately, the school wants to have X students enroll in the fall (not X-500 or X+500 but X or as close to it as possible, maybe go over a bit). They pull the you did EA, if you switch to ED2 here is what your merit/FA package would look like. Are you willing to switch? It's them saying "we want you, but only if you will commit to attend, otherwise we think you might get in elsewhere and go there" |
If your kid truly wanted to be at Case, they would have checked of A and would have gone from WL to accepted. |
Not accepting top stats kids that the university believes WILL NOT ATTEND. In the end, the university needs to put Y students in the freshman class on campus in the fall. Not Y+500 or less than Y. So their goal is to accept students who will actually matriculate. If your top stat kid doesn't show demonstrated interest and convice them you will attend, you might not get accepted. Very simple. |
Absolutely. Top LACs yield protect 100 percent. T10 is less obvious to me. I see Cornell yield protecting too. |
Bingo! My kid's top 2 final choices are colleges that get listed for "yield protecting" (especially one of them). Why? Because the campus is filled with T25/Ivy wanna-bees! These kids have the stats/resume to be competitive at those schools but didn't win the outright lottery. Oh and both of these schools are also in areas where "most kids are not that excited to attend---most didn't pick the school for the geographical location". For 60-70% of kids this was not their Top choice. They all applied to 2-3 T25 schools. However, most got WL or sophomore year start at at least 1 of those T 25 choices (my kid and ALL of their friends had this occur). Had most of those kids gotten an outright acceptance at one of those schools, they'd 99.999% be at that school. The schools know a competitive candidate for "higher schools" and if you want to get admission to a slightly lower school you MUST demonstrate extreme interest. For my kid, where they landed was their 2nd choice, but in their heart I think it was actually their top choice and best fit for them ---but they applied ED1 to a T10 in a more desirable location/my alma mater and it's an amazing school. But they ended up at what was probably truly the best choice for them. But they worked hard to show demonstrated interest at both of those schools, because we knew the T10 was a crap shoot. In return they got into both schools with good merit. |
Yes that is the exact definition. However, it is up to your student to convince each and every school that they are #1 for your kid. Thru essays, visits, online visits, inquiries, interviews, etc. For my kid at a school that yield protects (right outside T25 and known for being the fallback for T25 wanna-be's), that school values the interview. So we visited during summer and immediately scheduled an interview the same day as our tour, for the next week. Because that is how you demonstrate interest---my kid could talk about the school while it was all fresh for them and try to show why it was their #1 choice. They school values the interview process precisely so they can find out who actually would attend. |
Schools ranked 1-20 dont yield protect.
Schools ranked 75-450 don't yield protect. But there are some schools in that narrow band of 20-75 that do have to think about enrollment management. These are also the schools that give a big bump to ED applicants. |
I'd imagine yes it is because it is a reflection of a great admissions team. |
The higher ranked schools don't track demonstrated interest. I am the person who posted about ND. Their motivation is twofold. They want to get a strong yield, but they also want a student population that gets ND. Hence the reason for the "Why Notre Dame" essay that is required each year. |
this is such a ND response. you do know that every T100 school asks for a Why Us essay every year? |