Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:BS in Econ from a top liberal arts college will include accounting and is typically much more rigorous than a BS in Business Admin. The difference is in amount of calculus required. Econ majors at my DC's school go straight to Wall Street and major banks. Unless you're studying at Wharton, I recommend an Econ degree over one in Business Admin in almost every scenario.
You are totally wrong.
If the school has undergrad business program, it's usually more difficult to get in and more valuable.
I disagree. You clearly heave never studied admission stats for top SLACs vs business programs. You also clearly haven't looked at the curricula. Research is key BEFORE you speak.
OP wasn’t asking about top SLACs. The question was about mid-tier” liberal arts programs compared to undergrad business programs.
I can tell you having worked at multiple places that do a large amount of on-campus recruiting, outside of the Ivy/Ivy-level schools that don’t have undergrad business programs, it’s a *significant* advantage to have majored in business. If anything, the advantage is getting downplayed.
Why? Because at most schools with undergrad business programs, the
on-campus recruiting is heavily (if not entirely) restricted to business majors. This means that an economics major or a liberal arts major cannot just make up the difference by taking a few business classes on the side. Way too many people have way outdated information based on what happened many years ago or random anecdotes. For most on-campus recruiting, the firms say, “We want to interview ABC majors with an X GPA or higher” and the liberal arts majors don’t even have a chance.
Once again, it’s different at an Ivy/Ivy-level school or a place like Amherst/Williams, but the vast majority of people aren’t attending those types of places.