What's up with all the men's rights type posts here lately?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone knows men don’t have rights. They’re supposed to shut up and be good plow horses at work and good ATMs for their wives and kids,

OP here and this is exactly what I mean. The women who post here will be having a nuanced conversation, suggest nothing of the sort, and then a bitter man will pop in and say something like this. Very weird.

LOL!! Thanks for the chuckle. 😂😂

If you think there’s anything remotely resembling “nuanced conversation” on this hellscape of bored, vindictive, UMC housewives throwing elbows at one another over trivialities, then I’m willing to bet you read absolutely nothing other than DCUM.

So…intimidated by women who are smarter and more rational than you?

DP, I'll let you know when I meet one, but I'm not optimistic that I will.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone knows men don’t have rights. They’re supposed to shut up and be good plow horses at work and good ATMs for their wives and kids,

OP here and this is exactly what I mean. The women who post here will be having a nuanced conversation, suggest nothing of the sort, and then a bitter man will pop in and say something like this. Very weird.

lmao a "nuanced conversation" on DCUM is basically "are men evil and abusive, incompetent and helpless, or all of the above, discuss".

Can you link to one of these conversations? I don't see that, but I may have missed it in the barrage of "REEEEEEE!!! LOW-VALUE LIBERAL LADIES WITH CATS WANT HIGH-VALUE MEN!!!!!!" meltdown threads.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone knows men don’t have rights. They’re supposed to shut up and be good plow horses at work and good ATMs for their wives and kids,

OP here and this is exactly what I mean. The women who post here will be having a nuanced conversation, suggest nothing of the sort, and then a bitter man will pop in and say something like this. Very weird.

LOL!! Thanks for the chuckle. 😂😂

If you think there’s anything remotely resembling “nuanced conversation” on this hellscape of bored, vindictive, UMC housewives throwing elbows at one another over trivialities, then I’m willing to bet you read absolutely nothing other than DCUM.

Then why do you come here? Serious question. I don't go to Incel forums and hound you guys.

You've just accused him of being and incel and actually weakened your argument.
When someone responds back and doesn't agree with you, out come the insults.

Oh. So it's okay for men to come here and refer to women as harpies, shrews, or as PP did, vindictive, but when a woman deigns to suggest a man could be an incel - please note she didn't even call him an incel, she said "I don't go to incel forums" - insults actually weaken arguments? Okay.

Make it make sense.

Would it help to make it make sense if I told you that name calling of any kind weakens an argument, even if you think your name-calling is justified because the other side did it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone knows men don’t have rights. They’re supposed to shut up and be good plow horses at work and good ATMs for their wives and kids,

OP here and this is exactly what I mean. The women who post here will be having a nuanced conversation, suggest nothing of the sort, and then a bitter man will pop in and say something like this. Very weird.

lmao a "nuanced conversation" on DCUM is basically "are men evil and abusive, incompetent and helpless, or all of the above, discuss".

Can you link to one of these conversations? I don't see that, but I may have missed it in the barrage of "REEEEEEE!!! LOW-VALUE LIBERAL LADIES WITH CATS WANT HIGH-VALUE MEN!!!!!!" meltdown threads.

If you haven't seen any of the bazillion threads and comments about men being abusive, lazy, and incompetent, you're not even trying. Is this your first day on DCUM?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone knows men don’t have rights. They’re supposed to shut up and be good plow horses at work and good ATMs for their wives and kids,

OP here and this is exactly what I mean. The women who post here will be having a nuanced conversation, suggest nothing of the sort, and then a bitter man will pop in and say something like this. Very weird.

lmao a "nuanced conversation" on DCUM is basically "are men evil and abusive, incompetent and helpless, or all of the above, discuss".

Can you link to one of these conversations? I don't see that, but I may have missed it in the barrage of "REEEEEEE!!! LOW-VALUE LIBERAL LADIES WITH CATS WANT HIGH-VALUE MEN!!!!!!" meltdown threads.

If you haven't seen any of the bazillion threads and comments about men being abusive, lazy, and incompetent, you're not even trying. Is this your first day on DCUM?

So you can't link one? Does that mean they don't exist?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone knows men don’t have rights. They’re supposed to shut up and be good plow horses at work and good ATMs for their wives and kids,

OP here and this is exactly what I mean. The women who post here will be having a nuanced conversation, suggest nothing of the sort, and then a bitter man will pop in and say something like this. Very weird.

LOL!! Thanks for the chuckle. 😂😂

If you think there’s anything remotely resembling “nuanced conversation” on this hellscape of bored, vindictive, UMC housewives throwing elbows at one another over trivialities, then I’m willing to bet you read absolutely nothing other than DCUM.

So…intimidated by women who are smarter and more rational than you?

DP, I'll let you know when I meet one, but I'm not optimistic that I will.

So that’s a yes. You come here to get put in your place by women who are better than you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone knows men don’t have rights. They’re supposed to shut up and be good plow horses at work and good ATMs for their wives and kids,

OP here and this is exactly what I mean. The women who post here will be having a nuanced conversation, suggest nothing of the sort, and then a bitter man will pop in and say something like this. Very weird.

lmao a "nuanced conversation" on DCUM is basically "are men evil and abusive, incompetent and helpless, or all of the above, discuss".

Can you link to one of these conversations? I don't see that, but I may have missed it in the barrage of "REEEEEEE!!! LOW-VALUE LIBERAL LADIES WITH CATS WANT HIGH-VALUE MEN!!!!!!" meltdown threads.

They are the (victimized) leading men in their own fictitious fantasy land.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have noticed more RWNJ posts. Probably related.

As opposed to the usual LWNJ posts always in politics section?

DC is generally a liberal area with many bright, rational, informed people.

The RWNJs really stand out on DCUM. Especially the misogyny.

Yeah OK.

It’s ok. We call out the RWNJs regularly so you get that immediate feedback.

Look in the mirror for a LWNJ.

Because I don’t worship traitors? Ok.

No one is speaking of Trump, but I get that LWNJs have TDS and attention deficient problems big-time and try to insert him into any conversation regardless of context or topic.
Want a cookie?
(Your answer) Hey ! Trump likes cookies! Cookies are for RWNJs

Can't you debate just the topic being discussed?

Trump is the poster boy for RWNJs. Overinflated ego combined with underdeveloped EQ and IQ. And generally just a POS.

I don't even like Trump, or Biden, or nut jobs at either extreme.
But, I get that you have your one go-to response and are incapable of discussing anything rationally.
Or even grasp what I am trying to get you to understand.
Have a nice night.

Like I said, the rise in misogyny is related to the rise in RWNJ posts. Sorry you’re having trouble following the conversation.

Haven’t heard a rational argument yet. Maybe you can work on one tonight and present to class in the morning. Good luck! 👍

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have noticed more RWNJ posts. Probably related.

As opposed to the usual LWNJ posts always in politics section?

DC is generally a liberal area with many bright, rational, informed people.

The RWNJs really stand out on DCUM. Especially the misogyny.

Yeah OK.

It’s ok. We call out the RWNJs regularly so you get that immediate feedback.

Look in the mirror for a LWNJ.

Because I don’t worship traitors? Ok.

No one is speaking of Trump, but I get that LWNJs have TDS and attention deficient problems big-time and try to insert him into any conversation regardless of context or topic.
Want a cookie?
(Your answer) Hey ! Trump likes cookies! Cookies are for RWNJs

Can't you debate just the topic being discussed?

Trump is the poster boy for RWNJs. Overinflated ego combined with underdeveloped EQ and IQ. And generally just a POS.

I don't even like Trump, or Biden, or nut jobs at either extreme.
But, I get that you have your one go-to response and are incapable of discussing anything rationally.
Or even grasp what I am trying to get you to understand.
Have a nice night.

Like I said, the rise in misogyny is related to the rise in RWNJ posts. Sorry you’re having trouble following the conversation.

Haven’t heard a rational argument yet. Maybe you can work on one tonight and present to class in the morning. Good luck! 👍

And I see absolutely no relationship at all.
Sexist men can exist left, right, or center.
Present to your GED prep class?
OK U got it!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have noticed more RWNJ posts. Probably related.

As opposed to the usual LWNJ posts always in politics section?

DC is generally a liberal area with many bright, rational, informed people.

The RWNJs really stand out on DCUM. Especially the misogyny.

Yeah OK.

It’s ok. We call out the RWNJs regularly so you get that immediate feedback.

Look in the mirror for a LWNJ.

Because I don’t worship traitors? Ok.

No one is speaking of Trump, but I get that LWNJs have TDS and attention deficient problems big-time and try to insert him into any conversation regardless of context or topic.
Want a cookie?
(Your answer) Hey ! Trump likes cookies! Cookies are for RWNJs

Can't you debate just the topic being discussed?

Trump is the poster boy for RWNJs. Overinflated ego combined with underdeveloped EQ and IQ. And generally just a POS.

I don't even like Trump, or Biden, or nut jobs at either extreme.
But, I get that you have your one go-to response and are incapable of discussing anything rationally.
Or even grasp what I am trying to get you to understand.
Have a nice night.

Like I said, the rise in misogyny is related to the rise in RWNJ posts. Sorry you’re having trouble following the conversation.

Haven’t heard a rational argument yet. Maybe you can work on one tonight and present to class in the morning. Good luck! 👍

And I see absolutely no relationship at all.
Sexist men can exist left, right, or center.
Present to your GED prep class?
OK U got it!

Awww…must really burn to know many women here are better educated than you. And make more money.

Are there D misogynists? Sure. But the vast majority are R and I. Particularly those posting on DCUM.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone else noticed a sudden uptick in men's rights type posts here lately? Not on DCUM in general, just on the relationships board.

Crazy women imaging tings that are not reality. Film at 11.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone else noticed a sudden uptick in men's rights type posts here lately? Not on DCUM in general, just on the relationships board.

Crazy women imaging tings that are not reality. Film at 11.

Aww. You tried so hard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone else noticed a sudden uptick in men's rights type posts here lately? Not on DCUM in general, just on the relationships board.

Crazy women imaging tings that are not reality. Film at 11.

Did you think this was particularly hurtful? Really? Come on, dude, it's like you aren't even trying.

Also multiple other posters have said they noticed it as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone knows men don’t have rights. They’re supposed to shut up and be good plow horses at work and good ATMs for their wives and kids,

OP here and this is exactly what I mean. The women who post here will be having a nuanced conversation, suggest nothing of the sort, and then a bitter man will pop in and say something like this. Very weird.

LOL!! Thanks for the chuckle. 😂😂

If you think there’s anything remotely resembling “nuanced conversation” on this hellscape of bored, vindictive, UMC housewives throwing elbows at one another over trivialities, then I’m willing to bet you read absolutely nothing other than DCUM.

Then why do you come here? Serious question. I don't go to Incel forums and hound you guys.

You've just accused him of being and incel and actually weakened your argument.
When someone responds back and doesn't agree with you, out come the insults.

Incel. Man’s rights. Same misogyny, different day.

Chuckles above threw down some insults. Didn’t see you calling him out. Funny that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone knows men don’t have rights. They’re supposed to shut up and be good plow horses at work and good ATMs for their wives and kids,

OP here and this is exactly what I mean. The women who post here will be having a nuanced conversation, suggest nothing of the sort, and then a bitter man will pop in and say something like this. Very weird.

LOL!! Thanks for the chuckle. 😂😂

If you think there’s anything remotely resembling “nuanced conversation” on this hellscape of bored, vindictive, UMC housewives throwing elbows at one another over trivialities, then I’m willing to bet you read absolutely nothing other than DCUM.

Then why do you come here? Serious question. I don't go to Incel forums and hound you guys.

You've just accused him of being and incel and actually weakened your argument.
When someone responds back and doesn't agree with you, out come the insults.

Oh. So it's okay for men to come here and refer to women as harpies, shrews, or as PP did, vindictive, but when a woman deigns to suggest a man could be an incel - please note she didn't even call him an incel, she said "I don't go to incel forums" - insults actually weaken arguments? Okay.

Make it make sense.

Would it help to make it make sense if I told you that name calling of any kind weakens an argument, even if you think your name-calling is justified because the other side did it?

Np
They weren't arguing though. Pp had a good question, if a poster has such negative feelings about the threads here, why visit the site? She didn't insult that poster but referenced a forum for the self ascribed term incel. She points out how she would not visit a place she found distasteful.

I agree that it's perplexing to torture yourself reading posts that agitate you.