Anonymous wrote:Let me paste the part of the decision that you nincompoops did not read:
"But, despite the dissent’s assertion to the contrary, universities may not simply establish through application essays or other means the regime we hold unlawful today. (A dissent-
ing opinion is generally not the best source of legal advice on how to comply with the majority opinion.) “[W]hat cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly. The Constitution deals with substance, not shadows,” and the prohibition against racial discrimination is “levelled at the thing, not the name""
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}