Once again.. "I'm an English major and earn six figures, but I had to pay $100K+ to get a masters in order to get paid six figures". LOL |
so, you have no source that shows that majority of MBA grads get their graduate degrees paid for them. Got it. yes, some companies will pay for MBAs, but 1. some of those people getting their MBA paid for are probably engineering majors 2. the articles you posted still don't indicate that majority of English majors are getting their graduate degrees paid for them such that they are not having to spend $100K for graduate school in order to get paid six figures. Logic is not your strong suit. |
Imagine thinking that someone with a degree in engineering can only be an engineer. (Engineering is among the most commonly represented majors in the C-Suite at F500 companies, FYI.) |
But also not typically without a graduate degree. |
F100, top undergrad was actually BBA. https://www.forbes.com/sites/kimberlywhitler/2019/10/05/new-ceo-study-the-undergraduate-degrees-and-majors-of-fortune-100-ceos/?sh=60a6131c4130
But yes, F500, #1 undergrad is engineering, then econ, then BBA. https://academicinfluence.com/rankings/schools/which-colleges-most-alumni-ceos-fortune-500-companies |
but, statistically, engineering undergrad degree majors make six figures but English undergrad majors don't. |
My point is that by including vets, there must be grad degrees in the mix. Many engineers get them, so now you can't distinguish between strictly undergrad and those who also have grad. Also, I didn't say anything about English. Why such a beef with English? And, why the constant rehashing of these lists. People can be successful with all sorts of degrees. They carry their own costs and benefits that can't really be measured by lists like this. |
|
Most people don’t know ever become CEOs. For every English/history/poli sci major making $$$$, there are hundreds if not thousands of them sitting in the basements (or childhood bedrooms) of their parents’ homes and doing nothing but tweeting how unfair and unjust this capitalist society is. At least the Starbucks baristas have gainful employment.
Not all engineers are rich but most of them are able to put food on the table, and more. |
| My engineering graduate was offered $80k two weeks before graduation for a job that started three weeks later. So happy for them! |
+1 Engineers top out if they don't want to move into management (which many do not want to do). But the topping out will be at $150-250K and most will reach the $150K within 10 years easily. |
And the engineers with the similar drive/motivation often are heading into management (even without an MBA/Advanced degree) and becoming Sr director of engineering or VP of engineering. All without getting any more education And the English majors who don't have that drive/motivation are working jobs paying them $70-80K/year, while the engineers are getting $150-200K already. |
the CNBC article indicates that they looked just at undergrad. If you don't care about such topics, don't read/post on them. I don't generally read/post on topics I don't care about or have interest in. Why do you? |
👍👍👍 |
By the same token, people can be successful without any degrees. There are many people with plumbers’ or car mechanics’ or HVAC technicians’ certificates (or even without any certificates) who are far more successful in life than most English majors. |
Engineers aren't who they are complaining about when they decry capitalism, it's billionaires who are tilting politics for their benefit and evading taxes. Engineers are working schlubs like everyone else. And it looks like all college grads on average are earning enough to put food on the table and more. Engineers sure do seem to know how to beat a dead horse though. Must be all the emphasis on redundancy in design just bleeds through to everything else. |