Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My kid: (including HS for those who asked)
6 - Algebra I
Summer - Geometry
7 - Algebra II/Trig
8 - Precalculus
9 - BC
10 - Multi/Linear
11 - Diffy/Complex
12 - AP Stats
So far mine took,
4 - Algebra I
5 - Geometry
6 - Algebra II/Trig
7 - Precalculus
8 - Calc BC
Is this official enrollment or self study? If the former, how did you get the school to agree to algebra placement in 4th grade?
The more important question is WHY would you get the school to agree to this? What a mistake.
Artificial acceleration is the golden ticket to TJ.
What makes acceleration 'artificial?' If the kid is hyperaccelerated, but is also cruising through all of the classes with zero issues and perfect grades, then the kid is exactly where they belong.
Clearly they mean the dirty kind of acceleration that isn't available to everyone and requires $$$ for outside enrichment.
There's something dirty about teaching math to your child? This forum is crazy.
Yes, spending $20k on outside enrichment over the years as preparation for TJ is common in some circles.
Again, this thread is ridiculous.

It's not common anywhere to spend $20k on math enrichment.
If the kid wants to and is capable of handling more advanced work, why hold the kid back? Why is the acceleration "dirty" or in some way a bad thing?
Why do some people only have an issue with math enrichment or any suggestion that math acceleration could be pay-to-play?
Is it dirty to spend money on private music lessons that help your child be a soloist in the top orchestra?
Is it dirty to spend money on coaching and travel sports that help your child make the varsity team?
Of all of these, math is the least pay-to-play since there are many free or cheap resources.