College professor -“I am a white person who has incorrectly identified as Native my whole life.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still don't understand why identifying as any gender you choose is encouraged, but identifying as any race you choose is forbidden. Makes zero sense. Like so much liberal nonsense.

If you can't figure out the difference between the two you're honestly just stupid.

Race is based on heritage. Gender is a social construct.

You're throwing out nonsense like that and claiming others are stupid? Okey doke.

[Anonymous]

This is why affirmative action shouldn’t be a thing. People can lie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still don't understand why identifying as any gender you choose is encouraged, but identifying as any race you choose is forbidden. Makes zero sense. Like so much liberal nonsense.

If you can't figure out the difference between the two you're honestly just stupid.

Race is based on heritage. Gender is a social construct.

It’s been widely argued that race is also a social construct.

Heritage would be more akin to, say, sex.

[Anonymous]

I thought everyone learned about this when Senator Warren’s claim of native ancestry exposed. US Tribes have registries. It’s not difficult to find out if you’re on one. Very, very few people would be tribal members and not know it. Lots of people (including myself) have family lore and even evidence of Native American ancestry, but that doesn’t make you “Native American.” It’s not believable that someone who specialized in Native Studies wouldn’t know this.

[Anonymous]

I think in a lot of cases it is about body dysmorphia and a need to find some kind of recognizable anchor. I wish these people were not automatically considered criminals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still don't understand why identifying as any gender you choose is encouraged, but identifying as any race you choose is forbidden. Makes zero sense. Like so much liberal nonsense.

If you can't figure out the difference between the two you're honestly just stupid.

Race is based on heritage. Gender is a social construct.

You're throwing out nonsense like that and claiming others are stupid? Okey doke.

PP - Gender is quite literally a social construct. Think about how in the Victorian era it was acceptable for men to wear dressed but now it is considered "feminine".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still don't understand why identifying as any gender you choose is encouraged, but identifying as any race you choose is forbidden. Makes zero sense. Like so much liberal nonsense.

If you can't figure out the difference between the two you're honestly just stupid.

Race is based on heritage. Gender is a social construct.

It’s been widely argued that race is also a social construct.

Heritage would be more akin to, say, sex.

Yeah but the difference is that race is unchangeable.

Gender identity is frequently confused with biological sex. One is changeable, the other is not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still don't understand why identifying as any gender you choose is encouraged, but identifying as any race you choose is forbidden. Makes zero sense. Like so much liberal nonsense.

If you can't figure out the difference between the two you're honestly just stupid.

Race is based on heritage. Gender is a social construct.

You're throwing out nonsense like that and claiming others are stupid? Okey doke.

PP - Gender is quite literally a social construct. Think about how in the Victorian era it was acceptable for men to wear dressed but now it is considered "feminine".

What are you talking about?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still don't understand why identifying as any gender you choose is encouraged, but identifying as any race you choose is forbidden. Makes zero sense. Like so much liberal nonsense.

If you can't figure out the difference between the two you're honestly just stupid.

Race is based on heritage. Gender is a social construct.

It’s been widely argued that race is also a social construct.

Heritage would be more akin to, say, sex.

Yeah but the difference is that race is unchangeable.

Gender identity is frequently confused with biological sex. One is changeable, the other is not.

Race and gender are both perceived and do not have biological meaning. Sex and heritage do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still don't understand why identifying as any gender you choose is encouraged, but identifying as any race you choose is forbidden. Makes zero sense. Like so much liberal nonsense.

If you can't figure out the difference between the two you're honestly just stupid.

Race is based on heritage. Gender is a social construct.

You're throwing out nonsense like that and claiming others are stupid? Okey doke.

PP - Gender is quite literally a social construct. Think about how in the Victorian era it was acceptable for men to wear dresses but now it is considered "feminine".

What are you talking about?

Sorry I meant renaissance, not victorian era

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still don't understand why identifying as any gender you choose is encouraged, but identifying as any race you choose is forbidden. Makes zero sense. Like so much liberal nonsense.

If you can't figure out the difference between the two you're honestly just stupid.

Race is based on heritage. Gender is a social construct.

It’s been widely argued that race is also a social construct.

Heritage would be more akin to, say, sex.

Yeah but the difference is that race is unchangeable.

Gender identity is frequently confused with biological sex. One is changeable, the other is not.

Race and gender are both perceived and do not have biological meaning. Sex and heritage do.

"Transracialism" is just nonsense used to discredit transgender people

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can’t believe I’ve been diligently contributing to a 529 for years with the hope we can finance college for this nonsense.

It reminds me of the Soviet Union
Humanities were so politicized that everyone with half a brain chose physics or math or at least biology or chemistry as their major

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still don't understand why identifying as any gender you choose is encouraged, but identifying as any race you choose is forbidden. Makes zero sense. Like so much liberal nonsense.

If you can't figure out the difference between the two you're honestly just stupid.

Race is based on heritage. Gender is a social construct.

You're throwing out nonsense like that and claiming others are stupid? Okey doke.

PP - Gender is quite literally a social construct. Think about how in the Victorian era it was acceptable for men to wear dresses but now it is considered "feminine".

What are you talking about?

Sorry I meant renaissance, not victorian era

That is fashion, not gender. Nobody, including King Henry VIII, was saying he was female.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still don't understand why identifying as any gender you choose is encouraged, but identifying as any race you choose is forbidden. Makes zero sense. Like so much liberal nonsense.

If you can't figure out the difference between the two you're honestly just stupid.

Race is based on heritage. Gender is a social construct.

It’s been widely argued that race is also a social construct.

Heritage would be more akin to, say, sex.

Yeah but the difference is that race is unchangeable.

Gender identity is frequently confused with biological sex. One is changeable, the other is not.

Race and gender are both perceived and do not have biological meaning. Sex and heritage do.

"Transracialism" is just nonsense used to discredit transgender people

But I think the question is why is one nonsense and the other valid if both are socially constructed identities

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still don't understand why identifying as any gender you choose is encouraged, but identifying as any race you choose is forbidden. Makes zero sense. Like so much liberal nonsense.

If you can't figure out the difference between the two you're honestly just stupid.

Race is based on heritage. Gender is a social construct.

You're throwing out nonsense like that and claiming others are stupid? Okey doke.

PP - Gender is quite literally a social construct. Think about how in the Victorian era it was acceptable for men to wear dresses but now it is considered "feminine".

What are you talking about?

Sorry I meant renaissance, not victorian era

That is fashion, not gender. Nobody, including King Henry VIII, was saying he was female.

You're surely purposely being obtuse right? The different fashion rules for what men could wear back then versus what they can wear now is all the proof that gender is a social construct.